Abstract
The Dearing Report in the UK supported the use of benchmarking in higher education, taking as its stimulus the use of benchmarking in industrial and commercial contexts. The UK Government's concern regarding academic standards has raised the question of whether benchmarking could be applied to them.
This article reports on a pilot study of the benchmarking of academic standards in the UK, and demonstrates -- with reference to empirical data -- that benchmarking in this context needs to be approached differently from benchmarking in industrial/commercial milieux, since it requires a combination of finely-drawn comparisons and professional judgements if valid conclusions are to be drawn. It is argued that the complexity which underpins academic standards is inimical to the production of statements about standards that will be applicable across the span of a diverse national system of higher education. The argument presented can be applied, mutatis mutandis, to systems of higher education beyond the UK.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alstete, J.W. (1995). Benchmarking in Higher Education: Adapting Best Practices to Improve Quality[ASHE-ERIC ReportNo. 5].Washington, DC: The GeorgeWashington University Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
Becher, T. (1989). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE and Open University Press.
Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. London: Longmans.
Chapman, K. (1994). Variability of Degree Results in Geography in United Kingdom Universities, 1973–1990: Preliminary results and Policy Implications, Studies in Higher Education 19, 89–102.
CVCP/UFC (1992). University Management Statistics and Performance Indicators in the UK. London: Committee of Vice Chancellors and Principals and the Universities Funding Council.
Green, D. with Brannigan C, Mazelan P & Giles L (1994).Measuring Student Satisfaction: A Method of Improving the Quality of the Student's Experience? In S. Haselgrove (ed.), The Student Experience. Buckingham: SRHE and the Open University Press, 100–107.
HEQC (1996a). Assessment in Higher Education and the Role of 'Graduateness'. London: HEQC.
HEQC (1996b). Inter-institutional Variability of Degree Results: An Analysis in Selected Subjects. London: HEQC.
HEQC (1997). Graduate Standards Programme: Final Report(2 vols). London: HEQC.
Johnes, J. & Taylor, J. (1990). Performance Indicators in Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
Joint Performance Indicators Working Group (1994). Explanatory and Statistical Material to Accompany Consultative Report. Bristol: HEFCE (mimeo).
Lonbay, J. (1994). Governmental and Professional Power and Influence in Legal Education in Europe. In T. Becher (ed.), Governments and Professional Education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press, 76–85.
Morrison, H.G., Magennis, S.P. & Carey, L.J. (1995). Performance Indicators and League Tables: A Call for Standards. Higher Education Quarterly 49(2), 128–145.
Murphy, P. Hill, S. Linke, R. Aylward, D. & others (1994). Quantitative Indicators of Australian Research[NBEET commissioned report No. 27]. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Murphy, P.S. (1995). Benchmarking Academic Research Output in Australia. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 20(1), 45–57.
NCIHE (1997). Higher Education in the Learning Society[Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education]. London: HMSO.
NUCCAT (1998). Modularity and Credit Frameworks: the NUCCAT Survey and 1998 Conference Report. Hull: Northern Universities Consortium for Credit Accumulation and Transfer, University of Lincolnshire and Humberside.
QAA (1998). Quality Assurance: A New Approach. Higher Quality[the Bulletin of the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education] No. 4 (October), 2–12, 18–20.
Resnick, L.B., Nolan, K.J. & Resnick, D.P. (1995). Benchmarking Education Standards. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17(4), 438–461.
Vroeijenstijn, A.I. et al. (1992). International Programme Review Electrical Engineering. Utrecht: Vereniging van Samenwerkende Nederlandse Universiteiten [VSNU: Association of Universities in the Netherlands].
Wolf, A. (1995). Competence-based Assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Woolf, H. & Turner, D. (1997). Honours Classifications: The Need for Transparency. The New Academic, Autumn, 10–12.
Yorke, M. (1996). Indicators of Programme Quality. London: Higher Education Quality Council.
Yorke, M. (1997a). A Good League Table Guide? Quality Assurance in Education 5(2), 61–72.
Yorke, M. (1997b). The Elusive Quarry: Total Quality in Higher Education. Tertiary Education and Management 3(2), 145–156.
Yorke, M., with Bell, R., Dove, A., Haslam, L., Hughes, Jones, H., Longden, B., O'Connell, C., Typuszak, R. & Ward, J. (1997). Undergraduate Non-completion in England. Report No. 1. In Undergraduate Non-completion in Higher Education in England. Bristol: HEFCE.
Yorke, M., Bourdillon, B., Bridges, P., Collymore, D., Cooper, A., Fox, W., Haines, C., Turner, D. & Woolf, H. (1999). Benchmarking Academic Standards: A Pilot Investigation. In N. Jackson (ed.), Pilot Studies in Benchmarking Assessment Practice. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, 33–50.
Yorke, M., Cooper, A., Fox, W., Haines, C., McHugh, P., Turner, D. & Woolf, H. (1996). Module Mark Distributions in Eight Subject Areas and Some Issues They Raise. In N. Jackson (ed.), Modular Higher Education in the UK in Focus London: HEQC, 105–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yorke, M. Benchmarking Academic Standards in the UK. Tertiary Education and Management 5, 79–94 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018753222965
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018753222965