Skip to main content
Log in

Coping with Chronic Pain: Sources of Intrinsic and Contextual Variability

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate intrinsic and contextual sources of coping variability among 90 patients with chronic pain. Pain coping strategies were assessed by the subscales of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire. Intrinsic variables included demographic characteristics and dispositional optimism. Contextual variables included pain-related variables and pain control appraisals. In univariate analyses, ethnicity was a statistically significant intrinsic source of variability for the praying and hoping coping subscale; however, comparisons between pairs of ethnic groups were not statistically significant. A multivariate perspective of the data found three independent and salient patterns of correlation between the intrinsic and contextual variables and coping subscales. These patterns of correlation accounted for 96% of the total variance and were conceptualized as optimistic active coping, educated rational coping, and optimistic restricted coping. The findings raise the prospect that there are intrinsic and contextual explanations of coping variability for patients with chronic pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., and Weintraub, J. R. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 56: 267–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ell, K. O., and Haywood, L. J. (1985–1986). Sociocultural factors in MI re covery: An exploratory study. Int. J. Psychiatry Med. 15: 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkman S., and Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J. Health Soc. Behav. 21: 219–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetzel, R. D. (1996). A primer on factor analysis with comments on patterns of practice and reporting. In Thompson, B. (ed.), Advances in Social Science Research, 4th ed., JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 175–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A., Niven, C. A., and Knussen, C. (1995). The role of coping in adjustment to phantom limb pain. Pain 62: 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. P., and Karoly, P. (1991). Control beliefs, coping e fforts, and adjustment to chronic pain. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 59: 431–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. P., Turner, J. A., Romano, J. M., and Karoly, P. (1991). Coping with chronic pain: A critical revie w of the literature. Pain 47: 249–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. P., Turner, J. A., and Romano, J. M. (1992). Chronic pain coping me asures: Individual vs. composite scores. Pain 51: 273–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, I., Nygren, A., Gamberale, F., Goldie, I., and Westerholm, P. (1994). Coping with long-term musculoskeletal pain and its consequences: Is gender a factor? Pain 57: 167–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, F. J., and Williams, D. A. (1990). A comparison of coping strategies in chronic pain patients in different age groups. J. Gerontol. 45: 161–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, F. J., Caldwell, D. S., Queen, K. T., Gil, K. M., Martinez, S., Crisson, J. E., Ogden, W., and Nunley J. (1987) Pain coping strate gies in osteoarthritis patients. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 55: 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, F. J., Crisson, J., Urban, B. J., and Williams, D. A. (1990). Analyzing chronic low back pain: The relative contribution of pain coping strategies. Pain 40: 293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, K., Reesor, K. A., Keefe , F. J., and Turner, J. A. (1990). Dimensions of pain-related cognitive coping: Cross-validation of the factor structure of the Coping Strategy Questionnaire. Pain 43: 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. (1982). Age differences in the use of coping mechanisms. J. Gerontol. 37: 454–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstiel, A. K., and Keefe, F. J. (1983). The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: Relationship to patient characte ristics and current adjustment. Pain 17: 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheier M. F., and Carver C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychol. 4: 219–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, M. J., and Heppner, P. P. (1991). Gender role, gender-role conflict, and psychological well-being in men. J. Counsel. Psychol. 38: 323–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. (1992). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. (1984). Canonical Correlation Analysis: Uses and Interpretation, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. (1991). A primer on the logic and use of canonical correlation analysis. Measure. Eval. Counsel. Dev. 24: 80–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B., and Borrello, G. M. (1985). The importance of structure coefficients in regression research. Educ. Psychol. Measure. 55: 84–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. A., and Clancy, S. (1986). Strategies for coping with chronic low back pain: Relationship to pain and disability. Pain 24: 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villarruel, A. M., and Ortiz de Montellano, B. (1992). Culture and pain: A Mesoamerican perspective. ANS 15: 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitaliano, P. P., Maiuro, R. D., Russo, J., and Becker, J. (1987). Raw versus relative scores in the assessment of coping strategies. J. Behav. Med. 10: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Novy, D.M., Nelson, D.V., Hetzel, R.D. et al. Coping with Chronic Pain: Sources of Intrinsic and Contextual Variability. J Behav Med 21, 19–34 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018711420797

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018711420797

Navigation