Skip to main content
Log in

Q-fit: A probabilistic method for docking molecular fragments by sampling low energy conformational space

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new method is presented that docks molecular fragments to a rigid protein receptor. It uses a probabilistic procedure based on statistical thermodynamic principles to place ligand atom triplets at the lowest energy sites. The probabilistic method ranks receptor binding modes so that the lowest energy ones are sampled first. This allows constraints to be introduced to limit the depth of the search leading to a computationally efficient method of sampling low energy conformational space. This is combined with energy minimization of the initial fragment placement to arrive at a low energy conformation for the molecular fragment. Two different search methods are tested involving (i) geometric hashing and (ii) pose clustering methods. Ten molecular fragments were docked that have commonly been used to test docking methods. The success rate was 8/10 and 10/10 for generating a close solution ranked first using the two different sampling procedures. In general, all five of the top ranked solutions reproduce the observed binding mode, which increases confidence in the predictions. A set of ten molecular fragments that have previously been identified as problematic were docked. Success was achieved in 3/10 and 4/10 using the two different methods. Again there is a high level of agreement between the two methods and again in the successful cases the top ranked solutions are correct whilst in the case of the failures none are. The geometric hashing and pose clustering methods are fast averaging ∼ 13 and ∼ 11 s per placement respectively using conservative parameters. The results are very encouraging and will facilitate the process of finding novel small molecule lead compounds by virtual screening of chemical databases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuntz, I.D., Blaney, J.M., Oatley, S.J., Langridge, R. and Ferrin, T.E., J. Mol. Biol., 161 (1982) 269.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T. and Klebe, G., J. Mol. Biol., 261 (1996) 470.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R.C., Leach, A.R. and Taylor, R., J. Mol. Biol., 267 (1997) 727.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miranker, A. and Karplus, M., Proteins, 11 (1991) 29.

  5. Bohm, H.J., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 6 (1992) 61.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gillet, V., Johnson, A.P., Mata, P., Sike, S. and Williams, P., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 7 (1993) 127.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eisen, M.B., Wiley, D.C., Karplus, M. and Hubbard, R.E.,. Proteins, 19 (1994) 199.

  8. Knegtel, R.M. and Wagener, M., Proteins, 37 (1999) 334.

  9. Goodsell, D.S. and Olson, A., Proteins, 8 (1990) 195.

  10. Hart, T.N. and Read, R.J., Proteins, 13 (1992) 206.

  11. Judson, R.S., Jaeger, E.P. and Treasurywala, A.M., ]J. Mol. Struct., 308 (1994) 191.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gehlhaar, D.K., Verkhivker, G.M., Rejto, P.A., Sherman, C.J., Fogel, D.B., Fogel, L.J. and Freer, S.T., Chem. Biol., 2 (1995) 317.

  13. Baxter, C.A., Murray, C.W., Clark, D.E., Westhead, D.R. and Eldridge, M.D. Proteins, 33 (1998) 367.

  14. Lengauer, T. and Rarey, M., Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 6 (1996) 402.

  15. Dixon, J.S., Proteins, S1 (1997) 198.

  16. Goodford, P.J., J. Med. Chem., 28, (1985) 849.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moon, J.B. and Howe, W.J., Proteins, 11 (1991) 314.

  18. Marrone, T.J., Briggs, J.M. and McCammon, J.A., Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 37 (1997) 71.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jackson, R.M., Gabb, H.A. and Sternberg, M.J., J. Mol. Biol., 276 (1998) 265.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Berman, H.M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T.N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I.N. and Bourne, P.E., Nucleic Acids Res., 28 (2000) 235.

  21. Bachar, O., Fischer, D., Nussinov, R. and Wolfson, H., Protein Eng., 6 (1993) 279.

  22. Olson, C.F. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society Press, Seattle, Washington, 1994, pp. 251–258.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lawrence, M.C. and Davis, P.C., Proteins, 12 (1992) 31.

  24. McLachlan, A.D., J. Mol. Biol., 128 (1979) 49.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schnecke, V. and Kuhn, L.A., Intell. Syst.Mol. Biol., 7 (1999) 242.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nelder, J.A. and Mead, R., Comput. J., 7 (1965) 308.

  27. Gschwend, D.A. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 10 (1996) 123.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Boobbyer, D.N., Goodford, P.J., McWhinnie, P.M. and Wade, R.C., J. Med. Chem., 32 (1989) 1083.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Morris, G.M., Goodsell, D.S., Halliday, R.S., Huey, R., Hart, W.E., Belew, R.K. and Olson, A.J., J. Comput. Chem., 19 (1998) 1639.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Marquart, M., Walter, J., Deisenhofer, J., Bode, W. and Huber, R., Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B., 39 (1983) 480.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gilson, M.K. and Honig, B., Proteins, 4 (1988) 7.

  32. Jackson, R.M. and Sternberg, M.J., J. Mol. Biol., 250 (1995) 258.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Still, W.C., Tempczyk, A., Hawley, R.C. and Hendrickson, T., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112 (1990) 6127.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Given, J.A. and Gilson, M.K., Proteins, 33 (1998) 475.

  35. Majeux, N., Scarsi, M., Apostolakis, J., Ehrhardt, C. and Caflisch, A., Proteins, 37 (1999) 88.

  36. Meng, E.C, Shoichet, B.K. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem. 13 (1992) 505.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Boehm, H-J., Boehringer, M., Bur, D., Gmuender, H., Huber, W., Klaus, W., Kostrewa, D., Kuehne, H., Luebbers, T., Nathalie Meunier-Keller, N. and Mueller, F., J. Med. Chem., 43 (2000), 2664.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, R.M. Q-fit: A probabilistic method for docking molecular fragments by sampling low energy conformational space. J Comput Aided Mol Des 16, 43–57 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016307520660

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016307520660

Navigation