Abstract
A new method is presented that docks molecular fragments to a rigid protein receptor. It uses a probabilistic procedure based on statistical thermodynamic principles to place ligand atom triplets at the lowest energy sites. The probabilistic method ranks receptor binding modes so that the lowest energy ones are sampled first. This allows constraints to be introduced to limit the depth of the search leading to a computationally efficient method of sampling low energy conformational space. This is combined with energy minimization of the initial fragment placement to arrive at a low energy conformation for the molecular fragment. Two different search methods are tested involving (i) geometric hashing and (ii) pose clustering methods. Ten molecular fragments were docked that have commonly been used to test docking methods. The success rate was 8/10 and 10/10 for generating a close solution ranked first using the two different sampling procedures. In general, all five of the top ranked solutions reproduce the observed binding mode, which increases confidence in the predictions. A set of ten molecular fragments that have previously been identified as problematic were docked. Success was achieved in 3/10 and 4/10 using the two different methods. Again there is a high level of agreement between the two methods and again in the successful cases the top ranked solutions are correct whilst in the case of the failures none are. The geometric hashing and pose clustering methods are fast averaging ∼ 13 and ∼ 11 s per placement respectively using conservative parameters. The results are very encouraging and will facilitate the process of finding novel small molecule lead compounds by virtual screening of chemical databases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kuntz, I.D., Blaney, J.M., Oatley, S.J., Langridge, R. and Ferrin, T.E., J. Mol. Biol., 161 (1982) 269.
Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T. and Klebe, G., J. Mol. Biol., 261 (1996) 470.
Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R.C., Leach, A.R. and Taylor, R., J. Mol. Biol., 267 (1997) 727.
Miranker, A. and Karplus, M., Proteins, 11 (1991) 29.
Bohm, H.J., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 6 (1992) 61.
Gillet, V., Johnson, A.P., Mata, P., Sike, S. and Williams, P., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 7 (1993) 127.
Eisen, M.B., Wiley, D.C., Karplus, M. and Hubbard, R.E.,. Proteins, 19 (1994) 199.
Knegtel, R.M. and Wagener, M., Proteins, 37 (1999) 334.
Goodsell, D.S. and Olson, A., Proteins, 8 (1990) 195.
Hart, T.N. and Read, R.J., Proteins, 13 (1992) 206.
Judson, R.S., Jaeger, E.P. and Treasurywala, A.M., ]J. Mol. Struct., 308 (1994) 191.
Gehlhaar, D.K., Verkhivker, G.M., Rejto, P.A., Sherman, C.J., Fogel, D.B., Fogel, L.J. and Freer, S.T., Chem. Biol., 2 (1995) 317.
Baxter, C.A., Murray, C.W., Clark, D.E., Westhead, D.R. and Eldridge, M.D. Proteins, 33 (1998) 367.
Lengauer, T. and Rarey, M., Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 6 (1996) 402.
Dixon, J.S., Proteins, S1 (1997) 198.
Goodford, P.J., J. Med. Chem., 28, (1985) 849.
Moon, J.B. and Howe, W.J., Proteins, 11 (1991) 314.
Marrone, T.J., Briggs, J.M. and McCammon, J.A., Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 37 (1997) 71.
Jackson, R.M., Gabb, H.A. and Sternberg, M.J., J. Mol. Biol., 276 (1998) 265.
Berman, H.M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T.N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I.N. and Bourne, P.E., Nucleic Acids Res., 28 (2000) 235.
Bachar, O., Fischer, D., Nussinov, R. and Wolfson, H., Protein Eng., 6 (1993) 279.
Olson, C.F. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society Press, Seattle, Washington, 1994, pp. 251–258.
Lawrence, M.C. and Davis, P.C., Proteins, 12 (1992) 31.
McLachlan, A.D., J. Mol. Biol., 128 (1979) 49.
Schnecke, V. and Kuhn, L.A., Intell. Syst.Mol. Biol., 7 (1999) 242.
Nelder, J.A. and Mead, R., Comput. J., 7 (1965) 308.
Gschwend, D.A. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 10 (1996) 123.
Boobbyer, D.N., Goodford, P.J., McWhinnie, P.M. and Wade, R.C., J. Med. Chem., 32 (1989) 1083.
Morris, G.M., Goodsell, D.S., Halliday, R.S., Huey, R., Hart, W.E., Belew, R.K. and Olson, A.J., J. Comput. Chem., 19 (1998) 1639.
Marquart, M., Walter, J., Deisenhofer, J., Bode, W. and Huber, R., Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B., 39 (1983) 480.
Gilson, M.K. and Honig, B., Proteins, 4 (1988) 7.
Jackson, R.M. and Sternberg, M.J., J. Mol. Biol., 250 (1995) 258.
Still, W.C., Tempczyk, A., Hawley, R.C. and Hendrickson, T., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112 (1990) 6127.
Given, J.A. and Gilson, M.K., Proteins, 33 (1998) 475.
Majeux, N., Scarsi, M., Apostolakis, J., Ehrhardt, C. and Caflisch, A., Proteins, 37 (1999) 88.
Meng, E.C, Shoichet, B.K. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem. 13 (1992) 505.
Boehm, H-J., Boehringer, M., Bur, D., Gmuender, H., Huber, W., Klaus, W., Kostrewa, D., Kuehne, H., Luebbers, T., Nathalie Meunier-Keller, N. and Mueller, F., J. Med. Chem., 43 (2000), 2664.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jackson, R.M. Q-fit: A probabilistic method for docking molecular fragments by sampling low energy conformational space. J Comput Aided Mol Des 16, 43–57 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016307520660
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016307520660