Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physical Ergonomics in Low-Back Pain Prevention

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the current state of knowledge regarding the tools used in evaluating the workplace and worker in hopes of preventing low-back injury. Information regarding the current state of expenditure and trends toward ergonomic intervention are discussed. Acknowledgment is made of the increasing shift of responsibility from Compensation Boards to industry, and a review proactive preventative strategies and medical knowledge is included. Current ergonomic assessment tools are reviewed and the role of the Physical Ergonomist is introduced. Suggestions are made regarding the value of current and future approaches in prevention and direction of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Bullock ML. Ergonomics: The physiotherapist in the work place. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mital A. Recognizing musculoskeletal injury hazards in the upper extremities and lower back. Occup Health Safety 1997; 66(8): 91-99.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper JE, Tate RB, Yassi A, Khokhar J. Effect of an early intervention program on the relationship between subjective pain and disability measures in nurses with low back injury. Spine 1996; 21(20): 2329-2336.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kelsey JL, Pastides H, Bisbee GE, White AA. Musculoskeletatal disorders: Their frequency of occurrence and their impact on the population of the United States. New York: Prodist, 1978, pp. 31-36.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kelsey JL, White AA. Epidemiology and impact of low back pain. Spine 1980; 5(2): 133-142.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Workers Compensation Board of Alberta. Back Claims: By Transaction Year 1990-1998. Retrieved November 1, 1999 http://www.wcb.ab.ca/html/990726bg.html.

  7. Deyo RA, Bass JE. Lifestyle and low-back pain. The influence of smoking and obesity. Spine 1989; 14(5): 501-506.

    Google Scholar 

  8. U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA). Social Security Statistical Suppl; Num.HE3.3/3:979. Washington, DC: G.P.O. 1977-1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar S. Biomechanics in Ergonomics. London; Taylor and Francis, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar S. The effect of sustained spinal load on intra-abdominal pressure and EMG characteristics of trunk muscles. Ergonomics 1997; 40(12): 1312-1334.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bigos SJ, Battie MC, Spengler DM, Fisher LD, Fordyce WE, Hansson TH, Nachemson AL, Wortley MD. (1991). A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury. Spine 1991; 16(6): 688; 16(1): 1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lloyd G, Wolkind S, Greenwood R, Harris D. A psychiatric study of patients with persistent low back pain. Rheum Rehab 1979; 18: 30-34.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Andersson GBJ, Svenson HO, Oden A. The intensity of work recovery in low back pain. Spine 1983; 8: 880-884.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frymoyer JW, Rosen JC, Clements J, Pope MH. Psychologic factors in low-back pain disability. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1985; 195: 178-184.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marras WS, Fine LJ, Ferguson SA, Waters TR. The effectiveness of commonly used lifting assessment methods to identify industrial jobs associated with elevated risk of low-back disorders. Ergonomics 1999; 42(1): 229-245

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar S. Development of predictive equations for lifting strengths. Appl Ergon 1995; 26(5): 327-341.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar S, Garand D. Static and dynamic lifting strength at different reach distances in symmetrical and asymmetrical planes. Ergonomics 1992; 35(7/8): 861-880.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar S. The effect of sustained spinal load on intra-abdominal pressure and EMG characteristics of trunk muscles. Ergonomics 1997; 40(12): 1312-1334.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Statistics Canada 1991 Work injuries. Ottawa, Canada.

  20. Hagberg M. Occupational musculo-skeletal stress and disorders of the neck and shoulder:Areviewof possible pathophysiology. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1984; 53: 269-278.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chaffin DB. Human strength capacity and low back pain, J Occup Med 1974; 16: 248-254.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Silverstein BA, Fine LJ, Armstrong TJ. Hand, wrist cumulative trauma disorders in industry, Br J Ind Med 1986; 43: 779-784.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Herberts P, Kadefors R, Hogfors C, Sigholm G. Shoulder pain and heavy manual labor, Clin Orthop Rel Res 1984; 191: 166-178.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Westgaard R, Waersted M, Jansen T, Aaras A. Muscle load and illness associated with constrained body postures. In: Corlett EN, Wilson J, Manenica I, eds. The ergonomics of working postures. London: Taylor and Francis, 1986, pp. 3-18.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Andersson GBJ. Epidemiologic aspects on low-back pain in industry. Spine 1981; 6: 53-60.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Heliovaara M, Knekt P, Aroma A. Incidence and risk factors of herniated lumbar disc or sciatica leading to hospitalization. J Chronic Dis 1987; 3: 251-285.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar S. Cumulative load as a risk factor for low back pain. Spine 1990; 15: 1311-1316.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Frymoyer JW, Pope MH, Costanza MC, Rosen JC, Goggin JE, Wilder DG. Epidemiologic studies of low back pain. Spine 1980; 5(5): 419-423.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Snook SH, Campanelli RA, Hart JW. A study of three preventive approaches to low back injury. J Occup Med 1978; 20(7): 478-481.

    Google Scholar 

  30. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Revised guide to manual lifting. DHHS (NIOSH), Cincinnati, Ohio: Taft Laboratories, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mital A, Nicholoson AS, Ayoub MM. A guide to manual materials handeling. London, United Kingdom: Taylor and Francis, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Baril-Gingras G, Lortie M. Les modes operatoires et leurs determinants: Etude des activites de manutenion dans une grande enterprise de transport. In: 23rd Annual Conference of HFAC, Ottawa, 1990, pp. 137-142.

  33. Kumar S. The back compressive forces during maximal push-pull activities in the sagittal plane. J Human Ergol 1994; 23: 133-150.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Teasell RW, White K. Clinical approaches to low back pain. Part 2. Management, sequelae, and disability and compensation. Can Fam Physician 1994; 40: 480-485.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wiesel SW, Tsourmas N, Feffer HL, Citrin CM, Patranas N. A study of computer assisted tomography, 1: The incidence of positive CAT scan in an asymptomatic group of patients. Spine 1984; 9: 549-551.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Durant TL, Lord LJ, Domholdt E. Out patient views on direct access to physical therapy in Indiana. Phys Ther 1989; 69(10): 850-857.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Weale AE, Bannister GC. Who should see orthopedic outpatients-physiotherapists or surgeons? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1995; 77(Suppl. 2): 71-73.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brox JI, Hagen KB, Juel NG, Storheim K. Is exercise therapy and manipulation effective in low back pain? Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening 1999; 119(14): 2042-2050.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sandmeier R, Renstrom PA. Diagnosis and treatment of chronic tendon disorders in sports. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1997; 7(2): 96-106.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kumar S. Rehabilitation: An ergonomic dimension. Int J Ind Erg 1992; 9: 97-108.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nachemson A. Work for all, for those with back pain as well. Clin Orthop 1983; 12(Suppl. 1): 7S.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, T., Kumar, S. Physical Ergonomics in Low-Back Pain Prevention. J Occup Rehabil 11, 309–319 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013304826873

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013304826873

Navigation