Abstract
Self-directed learning with authentic and complex problems (problem-oriented learning) requires that learners observe their own learning and use additional information when it is appropriate (e.g. hypertextual information in computer-supported learning environments). Research results indicate that learners in problem-oriented learning environments often have difficulties using additional information adequately, and that they should be supported. Two studies with a computer-supported problem-oriented learning environment in the domain of medicine analysed the effects of strategy instruction on the use of additional information and the quality of the problem representation. In Study 1, an expert model was used for strategy instruction. Two groups were compared: one group with strategy modelling and one group without. Strategy modelling influenced the frequency of looked-up hypertextual information, but did not influence the quality of learners' problem representations. This could be explained by difficulties in applying the general hypertext information to the problem. In Study 2, the additional information was presented in a more contextualised way as graphical representation of the case and its relevant concepts. Again, two groups were compared: one with a strategy instruction text and one without. Strategy instruction texts supported an adequate use of this graphical information by learners and had an effect on the quality of their problem representations. These findings are discussed with respect to the design of additional help systems in problem-oriented learning environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Albanese, M. A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68, 52-81.
Barrows, H. S. (1985). How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years. New York: Springer.
Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481-486.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 361-385). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Boshuizen, H. P. A., Schmidt, H. G., Custers, E. J. F. M., & van de Wiel, M. W. (1995). Knowledge development and restructuring in the domain of medicine: The role of theory and practice. Learning and Instruction, 5, 269-289.
Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The Jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program, description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27, 291-315.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1993). Designing learning environments that support thinking: The Jasper series as a case study. In T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, D. H. Jonassen, & T. M. Welsh (Eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 9-36). New York: Springer.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Collins, A., & Brown, J. S. (1988). The computer as a tool for learning through reflection. In H. Mandl & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 1-18). New York: Springer.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction. Essays in the honour of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322-349.
Dolmans, D. H. (1994). How students learn in a problem-based curriculum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.
Fischer, F. (1998). Mappingverfahren als kognitive Werkzeuge für problemorientiertes Lernen [Concept mapping as a cognitive tool for problem-oriented learning]. Frankfurt, Germany: Lang.
Fischer, F., Gräsel, C., Kittel, A., & Mandl, H. (1997). Strategien zur Bearbeitung von Diagnoseproblemen in komplexen Lernumgebungen [Strategies for working with diagnostic problems in complex learning environments]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 29, 62-82.
Friedrich, H. F., & Mandl, H. (1992). Lern-und Denkstrategien — Ein Problemaufriss [Learning and thinking strategies — A critical overview]. In H. Mandl & H. F. Friedrich (Eds.), Lern-und Denkstrategien: Analyse und Intervention (pp. 3-54). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Gaudig, H. (1922). Die Schule im Dienste der werdenden Persönlichkeit [Schools for the development of personality]. Leipzig, Germany: Teubner.
Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of understanding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 702-718.
Gräsel, C. (1997). Problemorientiertes Lernen: Strategieanwendung und Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten [Problem-oriented learning: Strategy use and possibilities for design]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jonassen, D. H., & Mandl, H. (Eds.). (1990). Designing hypermedia for learning. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Kerschensteiner, G. (1912). Begriff der Arbeitsschule [The concept of the working school]. Leipzig, Germany: Teubner.
Lyon, H. D., Healy, J. C., Bell, J. R., O'Donnell, J. F., Shulth, E. K., Wigton, R. S., Hirai, F., & Beck, J. R. (1990). PlanAlyzer: Cases on hematology. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth Medical School.
Mandl, H., Gruber, H., & Renkl, A. (1996). Learning to apply: From ‘school garden instruction’ to technology-based learning environments. In S. Vosniadou, E. de Corte, R. Glaser, & H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technologysupported learning environments (pp. 307-321). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.
Prawat, R. S. (1993). The value of ideas: Problems versus possibilities in learning. Educational Researcher, 22(11), 5-16.
Pressley, M., Snyder, B. L., Levin, J. R., Murray, H. G., & Ghatala, E. S. (1987). Perceived readiness for examination performance (PREP) produced by initial reading of text and text containing adjunct questions. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 219-236.
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13-20.
Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1993). On acquiring expertise in medicine. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 1-17.
Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1989). Memory development between 2 and 20. New York: Springer.
Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Anderson, D. K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: Antidotes for analogy-induced misconceptions in advanced knowledge organization. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 498-531). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stark, R., Graf, M., Renkl, A., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1995). Förderung von Handlungskompetenz durch geleitetes Problemlösen und multiple Lernkontexte [Fostering action competence by guided problem-solving and multiple learning contexts]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 27, 289-312.
Williams, S. M. (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 367-427.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gräsel, C., Fischer, F. & Mandl, H. The Use of Additional Information in Problem-Oriented Learning Environments. Learning Environments Research 3, 287–305 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011421732004
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011421732004