Skip to main content
Log in

THE PROBLEM OF CONSCIOUS OBSERVATION IN QUANTUM MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Letters

Abstract

Epistemological consequences of quantum nonlocality (entanglement) are discussed under the assumption of a universally valid Schrödinger equation and the absence of hidden variables. This leads inevitably to a many-minds interpretation. The recent foundation of quasi-classical neuronal states in the brain (based on environmental decoherence) permits in principle a formal description of the whole chain of measurement interactions, including the behavior of a conscious observer, without introducing any intermediate classical concepts (for macroscopic “pointer states”) or “observables” (for microscopic particle positions and the like)—thus consistently formalizing Einstein's ganzer langer Weg from the observed to the observer in quantum mechanical terms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. von Neumann, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantentheorie (Berlin, 1932).

  2. H. D. Zeh, Found. Phys. 1, 69 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scient. Amer. 242,Nos. 5 and 8 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. D. Zeh, Found. Phys. 9, 803 (1979).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. See, e.g., J. M. Davidson and R. J. Davidson, eds., The Psychobiology of Consciousness (Plenum, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Pribram, Ref. [6], p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Vaihinger, Die Philosophie des Als Ob (Berlin, 1911).

  9. W. Pauli's letters to M. Born, in M. Born, Briefwechsel zwischen A. Einstein und M. Born (Nymphenburger, München, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. D. Zeh, Epist. Lett. No. 49.0 (1980).

  11. H. Everett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Ph. Pearle, Phys. Rev. D 13, 857 (1976).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. E. Wigner, in L. J. Good, ed., The Scientist Speculates (Heinemann, London, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952). J. S. Bell, Epist. Lett. No. 37.0 (1978); also published in C. Isham, R. Penrose, and D. Sciama, eds., Quantum Gravity 2 (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1981). H. D. Zeh, Found. Phys. Lett. 12, 197 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. H. D. Zeh, in B. d'Espagnat, ed., Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Enrico Fermi School of Physics IL) (Academic, New York 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. D. Zeh, Found. Phys. 3, 109 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Giulini, E. Joos, C. Kiefer, J. Kupsch, I.-O. Stamatescu, and H. D. Zeh, Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory (Springer, Berlin, 1996).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Albert and B. Loewer, Synthese 77, 195 (1988).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Lockwood, Mind, Brain and the Quantum: The Compound 'I' (Blackwell, Oxford, 1989); Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 47, 159 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. J. Donald, Found. Phys. 22, 1111 (1992); 25, 529 (1995).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. H. Stapp, in P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds., Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991); Mind, Matter, and Quantum Mechanics (Springer, Berlin, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. J. Chalmers, The Conscious Mind (Oxford University Press, New York, 1996); see also L. Vaidman, e-print quant-ph/0001057.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Whitaker, in Ph. Blanchard, D. Giulini, E. Joos, C. Kiefer, I. O. Stamatescu, eds., Decoherence: Theoretical, Experimental, and Conceptual Problems (Springer, Berlin, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. Squires, Eur. J. Phys. 8, 171 (1987); Conscious Mind in the Physical World (Hilger, Bristol, 1990).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. D. N. Page, e-print quant-ph/9506010.

  26. M. Tegmark, Phys. Rev. E 61, 4194 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Beller, Quantum Dialogue (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1999).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. H. D. Zeh, The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time, 3rd edn. (Springer, Berlin, 1999); see also www.time-direction.de

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. F. London and E. Bauer, La théorie d'observation en mécanique quantique (Hermann, Paris, 1939).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. R. Penrose, Shadows of the Mind (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  31. W. Heisenberg, Der Teil und das Canze (Piper, München, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. C. Ghirardi, Phys. Lett. A 262, 1 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Arndt et al., Nature 401, 680 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. A. R. Damasio, The Feeling of What Happens (Harcourt & Brace, New York, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeh, H.D. THE PROBLEM OF CONSCIOUS OBSERVATION IN QUANTUM MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION. Found Phys Lett 13, 221–233 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007895803485

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007895803485

Navigation