Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of two IPM training strategies in China: The importance of concepts of the rice ecosystem for sustainable insect pest management

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our study in China of two Integrated Pest Management (IPM) training programs for farmers shows that one is more effective than the other in reducing pesticide applications as well as in imparting to farmers an understanding of the rice ecosystem. The two training programs are based upon two different paradigms of IPM. This article uses a triangulated method of measuring concept attainment among farmer trainees in China as one measure of the effectiveness of training. Concepts of insect ecology brought about by training, as well as persistence of concepts one year after training, are measured. This information is compared to farmer data on pesticide applications and yields in order to determine the comparative effectiveness of two models of IPM farmer training in Sichuan Province. Results indicate that the Farmer Field School (FFS) model of training, based upon a new Ecology-Based IPM paradigm, is more effective than the 3 Pests 3 Diseases (3P3D) model based upon an older Economic Threshold IPM paradigm. Crop yield results and pesticide applications by farmers after training are also used to indicate which of these paradigms of insect pest control is more effective, hence scientifically accurate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cheng Jiaan, and Liang Diyun (1993), Shuidao bing chong hai zonghe fangzhi xiaoyi pinggu (“An evaluation of economic benefit of rice IPM”), Plant Protection Technology and Extension(pp. 32-41). Beijing: General Station for Plant Protection, Dec. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croll, E. (1996), China's rural-urban mobility and transformation. Beijing: Ford Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, P., and N. Thorpe (1994), Ancient Inventions(pp. 395- 396). New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenmore, P. (1980), Ecology and outbreaks of a tropical insect pest of the green revolution: The rice brown planthopper, nilaparvata lugens (Stal). Berkeley: University of California, Graduate Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenmore, P., K. Gallagher, and P. Ooi (1995), “Empowering farmers: Experiences with integrated pest management,” Entwicklung & Landicher Raum1/95: 27-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Shaoshi (1992), Farmer pest management practices in Hunan. Changsha: Plant Protection and Quarantine Station of Hunan, P. R. China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Shaoshi (1996), “Developing rice farmers' decision-making technique for integrated pest management,” Plant Protection Technology and Extension16(3): 3-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Linming, Wang Desheng, Li Tianxiang, and Luo Dingcheng (1995), Biological control of rice insect pests in Sichuan, Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Monograph of Study on IPC Techniques on Rice8(Supplement): 73-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangan, J. (1996), “The need for policy support for IPM farmer training: An inter-country perspective,” Proceedings of the national symposium on IPM in China(pp. 200-205). Beijing: Chinese Department of Agriculture Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangan, M. S. (1996), Rice Ecosystem Concepts of Chinese Farmers before and after Farmer Field School Training.Murdoch, West Australia: Murdoch University School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990), Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd edn. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970), Genetic Epistemology. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, J. (1991), Farmer Field School Survey: Impact of IPM Training on Farmers' Pest Control Behavior.Jakarta: Integrated Pest Management National Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines, A. L., and L. H. T. West (1986), “Conceptual understanding and science learning: An interpretation of research within a sources-of-knowledge framework,” Science Education70(5): 583-604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settle, W. H., H. Ariawan, E. T. Astuti, W. Cahyana, A. L. Hakim, D. Hindayana, A. Sri Lestari, Pajarningsih, and Sartanto (1996), “Managing tropical rice pests through conservation of generalist natural enemies and alternate prey,” Ecology77(7): 1975-1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf (1981), Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 2nd edn. New York, W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vayda, A., and I. Setyawati (1994), “Questions about culturerelated considerations in research on cognition and agroecological change: Illustrations from studies of agricultural pest management in Java,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Cultural Dynamics in Development Processes, June, 1994. Woudschoten, The Netherlands: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1992), Thought and Language, 6th edn. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Way, M. J., and K. L. Heong (1994), “The role of biodiversity in the dynamics and management of insect pests of tropical irrigated rice: A review,” Bulletin of Entomological Research84: 567-587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, T., R. E. Soeriaatmadja, and S. A. Afiff (1996), The Ecology of Indonesia Series, Volume II: Java and Bali.Hong Kong, Periplus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., G. Hu, J. Tang, Z. She, J. Yang, Z. Wan, and Z. Ren (1994), “Studies on the regulation effect of neutral insects on the community food web in paddy fields,” Acta Ecologica Sinica14(4): 381-386.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mangan, J., Mangan, M.S. A comparison of two IPM training strategies in China: The importance of concepts of the rice ecosystem for sustainable insect pest management. Agriculture and Human Values 15, 209–221 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007434518330

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007434518330

Navigation