Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A genetic code Boolean structure. I. The meaning of Boolean deductions

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a genetic code Boolean structure derived from hydrogen bond numbers and chemical types of bases, purines and pyrimidines. It shows that in such Boolean structure, deductions comprise physico-chemical meaning. In particular, codons with adenine as a second base coding to hydrophilic amino acids are not deductible from codons with uracil in the same position, which code to hydrophobic amino acids. Boolean deductions could help us describe the gene evolution process. For instance, most of the reported mutations that confer drug resistance to the HIV protease gene correspond to deductions. What is more, in the human beta-globin gene a similar situation appears where most of the single codon mutations correspond to Boolean deductions from the respective wild-type codon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alf-Steinberger, C., 1969. The genetic code and error transmission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 64, 584–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, J., 2002. Symmetry scheme for amino acid codons. Phys. Rev. E 65, 021912–021915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashford, J.D., Jarvis, P.D., 2000. The genetic code as a periodic table. Biosystems 57, 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashford, J.D., Tsohantjis, I., Jarvis, P.D., 1998. A supersymmetric model for the evolution of the genetic code. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 987–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beland, P., Allen, T.F., 1994. The origin and evolution of the genetic code. J. Theor. Biol. 170, 359–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertman, M.O., Jungck, J.R., 1979. Group graph of the genetic code. J. Hered. 70, 379–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, G., MacLane, S., 1941. A Survey of Modern Algebra. The Macmillan Company, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chothia, C., 1974. Hydrophobic bonding and accessible surface area in proteins. Nature 248, 338–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F.H.C., 1968. The origin of the genetic code. J. Mol. Biol. 38, 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, C.J., 1966. Role of the amino-acid ‘code’ and of selection for conformation in the evolution of proteins. Nature 210, 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, S.M., Weinstein, I.B., 1964. Lack of fidelity in the translation of ribopolynucleotides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 52, 988–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, D., Massar, S., Cerf, N.J., Rooman, M., 2001. Optimality of the genetic code with respect to protein stability and amino acid frequencies. Genome Biol. 2, research0049.1-research0049.12.

  • Grantham, R., 1974. Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution. Science 185, 862–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, M., Petoukhov, S.V., Ricci, P.E., 2004. Genetic code, Hamming distance and stochastic matrices, Bull. Math. Biol. (in press).

  • Jimńez-Montaño, M.A., de la Mora-Basanet, C.R., Poschel, T., 1996. The hypercube structure of the genetic code explains conservative and non-conservative amino acid substitutions in vivo and in vitro. Biosystems 39, 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Montaño, M.A., 1999. Protein evolution drives the evolution of the genetic code and vice versa. Biosystems 54, 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasev, V.A., Stefanov, V.E., 2001. Topological nature of the genetic code. J. Theor. Biol. 209, 303–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, P.A., 1997. Hydrophobicity regained. Protein Sci. 6, 1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, J., 2000. Physico-chemical constraints connected with the coding properties of the genetic system. J. Theor. Biol. 202, 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J., 1989. Errors and alternatives in reading the universal genetic code. Microbiol. Rev. 53, 273–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, D., Knight, R.D., Freeland, S.J., Landweber, L.F., 1999. Selection, history and chemistry: the three faces of the genetic code. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 241–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G.D., Geselowitz, A.R., Lesser, G.J., Lee, R.H., Zehfus, M.H., 1985. Hydrophobicity of amino acid residues in globular proteins. Science 229, 834–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemion, I.Z., Siemion, P.J., Krajewski, K., 1995. Chou-Fasman conformational amino acid parameters and the genetic code. Biosystems 36, 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stambuk, N., 2000. Universal metric properties of the genetic code. Croatica Chem. Acta 73, 1123–1139.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robersy Sánchez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sánchez, R., Morgado, E. & Grau, R. A genetic code Boolean structure. I. The meaning of Boolean deductions. Bull. Math. Biol. 67, 1–14 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulm.2004.05.005

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulm.2004.05.005

Keywords

Navigation