Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A mathematical model for the dynamics of large membrane deformations of isolated fibroblasts

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we develop and extend a previous model of cell deformations, initially proposed to describe the dynamical behaviour of round-shaped cells such as keratinocytes or leukocytes, in order to take into account cell pseudopodial dynamics with large amplitude membrane deformations such as those observed in fibroblasts. Beyond the simulation (from a quantitative, parametrized model) of the experimentally observed oscillatory cell deformations, a final goal of this work is to underline that a set of common assumptions regarding intracellular actin dynamics and associated cell membrane local motion allows us to describe a wide variety of cell morphologies and protrusive activity.

The model proposed describes cell membrane deformations as a consequence of the endogenous cortical actin dynamics where the driving force for large-amplitude cell protrusion is provided by the coupling between F-actin polymerization and contractility of the cortical actomyosin network. Cell membrane movements then result of two competing forces acting on the membrane, namely an intracellular hydrostatic protrusive force counterbalanced by a retraction force exerted by the actin filaments of the cell cortex. Protrusion and retraction forces are moreover modulated by an additional membrane curvature stress.

As a first approximation, we start by considering a heterogeneous but stationary distribution of actin along the cell periphery in order to evaluate the possible morphologies that an individual cell might adopt. Then non-stationary actin distributions are considered. The simulated dynamic behaviour of this cytomechanical model not only reproduces the small amplitude rotating waves of deformations of round-shaped cells such as keratinocytes [as proposed in the original model of Alt and Tranquillo (1995, J. Biol. Syst. 3, 905–916)] but is furthermore in very good agreement with the protrusive activity of cells such as fibroblasts, where large amplitude contracting/retracting pseudopods are more or less periodically extended in opposite directions. In addition, the biophysical and biochemical processes taken into account by the cytomechanical model are characterized by well-defined parameters which (for the majority) can be discussed with regard to experimental data obtained in various experimental situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, V. C., V. Krishnamurthi, D. Lansing Taylor and F. Lanni (1999). The actin based nanomachine at the leading edge of migrating cells. Biophys. J. 77, 1721–1732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alenghat, F. J., B. Fabry, K. Y. Tsai, W. H. Goldmann and D. E. Ingber (2000). Analysis of cell mechanics in single vinculin-deficient cells using a magnetic tweezer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 277, 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alt, W. (1990). Mathematical models and analysing methods for the lamellipodial activity of leukocytes. NATO ASI (Adv. Sci. Inst.) Ser. H, Cell Biol. 42, 407–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt, W., O. Brosteanu, B. Hinz and W. H. Kaiser (1995). Patterns of spontaneous motility in videomicrographs of human epidermal keratinocytes. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 73, 441–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alt, W. and R. T. Tranquillo (1995). Basic morphogenetic system modeling shape changes of migrating cells: how to explain fluctuating lamellipodial dynamics. J. Biol. Syst. 3, 905–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Ziv, R., E. Moses and P. Nelson (1998). Dynamic excitations in membranes induced by optical tweezers. Biophys. J. 75, 294–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bausch, A. R., W. Moller and E. Sackmann (1999). Measurement of local viscoelasticity and forces in living cells by magnetic tweezers. Biophys. J. 76, 573–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bausch, A. R., F. Ziemann, A. A. Boulbitch, K. Jacobson and E. Sackmann (1998). Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry. Biophys. J. 75, 2038–2049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter-Hahn, J. and H. Luers (1998). Subcellular tension fields and mechanical resistance of the lamella front related to the direction of locomotion. Cell. Biochem. Biophys. 29, 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borisy, G. G. and T. M. Svitkina (2000). Actin machinery: pushing the envelope. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 12, 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, K., J. H. Park and D. Lansing Taylor (1999). Keratocytes generate traction forces in two phases. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 3745–3769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlier, M. F. and D. Pantaloni (1997). Control of actin dynamics in cell motility. J. Mol. Biol. 269, 459–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cevc, G. and D. Marsh (1987). Phospholipid Bilayers, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condeelis, J. (1993). Life at the leading edge: the formation of cell protrusions. Annu. Rev. Cell. Biol. 9, 411–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, L. P., M. Siebert and T. J. Mitchison (1997). Identification of novel graded polarity actin filaments bundles in locomoting heart fibroblasts: implications for the generation of motile force. J. Cell. Biol. 136, 1287–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, M., T. Oliver, A. Ishihara and K. Jacobson (1996). Imaging the traction forces exerted by locomoting cells with the elastic substratum method. Biophys. J. 70, 2008–2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, M. and Y. L. Wang (1999). Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. Biophys. J. 76, 2307–2316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichinger, L., B. Koppel, A. A. Noegel, M. Schleicher, M. Schliwa, K. Weijer, W. Witke and P. A. Janmey (1996). Mechanical perturbation elicits a phenotypic difference between Dictyostelium wild-type cells and cytoskeletal mutants. Biophys. J. 70, 1054–1060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, C. G. and M. P. Sheetz (1999). Keratocytes pull with similar forces on their dorsal and ventral surfaces. J. Cell. Biol. 147, 1313–1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, W. H., R. C. Lantz and R. W. Gore (1995). Locomotive forces produced by single leukocytes in vivo and in vitro. Am. J. Physiol. 268, C1308–C1312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Guyader, H. and C. Hyver (1997). Periodic activity of the cortical cytoskeleton of the lymphoblast: modelling by a reaction-diffusion system. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 320, 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., D. Stopak and P. Wild (1980). Silicon rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. Science 208, 177–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killich, T., P. J. Plath, H. Bultmann, L. Rensing and M. G. Vicker (1993). The locomotion shape and pseudopodial dynamics of unstimulated dictyostelium cells are not random. J. Cell. Sci. 106, 1005–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killich, T., P. J. Plath, H. Bultmann, L. Rensing and M. G. Vicker (1994). Cell movement and shape are non-random and determined by intracellular, oscillatory rotating waves in dictyostelium amoebae. Biosystems 33, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. S., J. Neu and G. Oster (1998). Curvature-mediated interactions between membrane proteins. Biophys. J. 75, 2274–2291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, V. M., S. Henon, E. Planus, R. Fodil, M. Balland, D. Isabey and F. Gallet (2002). Assessment of mechanical properties of adherent cells by bead micromanipulation: comparison of magnetic twisting cytometry vs optical tweezers. J. Biomech. Eng. 124, 408–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, V. M., E. Planus, R. Fodil and D. Isabey (2003). Mechanical assessment by magnetocytometry of the cytosolic and cortical cytoskeletal compartments in adherent epithelial cells. Biorheology 40, 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., A. Ishihara and K. Jacobson (1993). How do cells move along surfaces? Trends Cell. Biol. 3, 366–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. A. and J. D. Murray (1991). Analysis of stable two-dimensional patterns in contractile cytogel. J. Nonlinear Sci. 1, 289–311.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. A. and J. D. Murray (1992). Analysis of dynamic and stationary pattern formation in the cell cortex. J. Math. Biol. 31, 25–71.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, R., R. Simson, D. A. Simson, M. Hohenadl, A. Boulbitch, E. Wallraff and E. Sackmann (2000). A micromechanic study of cell polarity and plasma membrane cell body coupling in Dictyostelium. Biophys. J. 79, 707–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogilner, A. and G. Oster (1996). The physics of lamellipodial protrusion. Eur. Biophys. J. 25, 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, C., M. Goulian and O. S. Andersen (1998). Energetics of inclusion-induced bilayer deformations. Biophys. J. 74, 1966–1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, T., M. Dembo and K. Jacobson (1995). Traction forces in locomoting cells. Cell. Motil. Cytoskeleton 31, 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, T., M. Dembo and K. Jacobson (1999). Separation of propulsive and adhesive traction stresses in locomoting keratocytes. J. Cell. Biol. 145, 589–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oster, G. F. (1984). On the crawling of cells. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. Supp. 83, 329–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peskin, C. S., G. M. Odell and G. F. Oster (1993). Cellular motions and thermal fluctuations: the Brownian ratchet. Biophys. J. 65, 316–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourati, J., A. Maniotis, D. Spiegel, J. L. Schaffer, J. P. Butler, J. J. Fredberg, D. E. Ingber, D. Stamenovic and N. Wang (1998). Is cytoskeletal tension a major determinant of cell deformability in adherent endothelial cells? Am. J. Physiol. (Cell Physiol.) 274, C1283–C1289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radmacher, M., M. Fritz, C. M. Kacher, J. P. Cleveland and P. K. Hansma (1996). Measuring the viscoelastic properties of human platelets with the atomic force microscope. Biophys. J. 70, 556–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragsdale, G., K. J. Phelps and K. Luby-Phelps (1997). Viscoelastic response of fibroblasts to tension transmitted through adherents junctions. Biophys. J. 73, 2798–2808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raucher, D. and M. P. Sheetz (2000). Cell spreading and lamellipodial extension is regulated by membrane tension. J. Cell. Biol. 148, 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotsch, C., K. Jacobson and M. Radmacher (1999). Dimensional and mechanical dynamics of active and stable edges in motile fibroblasts investigated by using atomic force microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 96, 921–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotsch, C. and M. Radmacher (2000). Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: an atomic force microscopy study. Biophys. J. 78, 520–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheetz, M. P., D. Felsenfeld, C. G. Galbraith and D. Choquet (1999). Cell migration as a five-step cycle. Biochem. Soc. Symp. 65, 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simson, R., E. Wallraff, J. Faix, J. Niewohner, G. Gerisch and E. Sackmann (1998). Membrane bending modulus and adhesion energy of wild-type and mutant cells in Dictyostelium lacking talin or cortexillins. Biophys. J. 74, 514–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, J. V., A. Rohlfs and M. Herzog (1993). Actin and cell movement, in Cell Behaviour: Adhesion and Motility, G. Jones, C. Wigley and R. Warn (Eds), The Society of Experimental Biology, pp. 57–71.

  • Soares, K. M. and C. C. Maghelly (1999). Linear instability analysis andmechanical interfacial tension. J. Theor. Biol. 196, 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephanou, A., X. Ronot and P. Tracqui (2003). Analysis of cell motility combining cytomechanical model simulations and an optical flow method, in Polymer and Cell Dynamics—Multiscale Modelling and Numerical Simulation, W. Alt, M. Chaplain, M. Griebel and J. Lenz (Eds), Basel: Birkhauser-Verlag, pp. 91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephanou, A. and P. Tracqui (2002). Cytomechanics of cell deformations and migration: from models to experiments. C. R. Biol. 325, 295–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, J. J. (1969). Differential Geometry, Wiley-Interscience.

  • Strikverda, J. C. (1989). Finite difference schemes and partial differential equations, in Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, Mathematics Series.

  • Sung, K. L., P. C. Dong, G. W. Scmidt-Schonbein, S. Chien and R. Skalak (1988). Leukocyte relaxation properties. Biophys. J. 54, 331–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theriot, J. A. and T. J. Mitchison (1991). Actin microfilament dynamics in locomoting cells. Nature 352, 126–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoumine, O. and A. Ott (1997). Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation. J. Cell. Sci. 110, 2109–2116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valberg, P. A. and D. F. Albertini (1985). Cytoplasmic motions, rheology and structure probed by a novel magnetic particle method. J. Cell Biol. 101, 130–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N., J. P. Butler and D. E. Ingber (1993). Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science 260, 1124–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., A. Palmer and D. Wirtz (1998). Rheology and microrheology of semiflexible polymer solutions: actin filament networks. Macromolecules 31, 6486–6492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, S., D. Wirtz and S. C. Kuo (2000). Mechanics of living cells measured by laser tracking microrheology. Biophys. J. 78, 1736–1747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanai, M., J. P. Butler, T. Suzuki, A. Kanda, M. Kurachi, H. Tashiro and H. Sasaki (1999). Intracellular elasticity and viscosity in the body, leading and trailing regions of lomoting neutrophils. Am. J. Physiol. (Cell Physiol.) 277, C432–C440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahalak, G. I., W. B. McConnaughey and E. L. Elson (1990). Determination of cellular mechanical properties by cell poking, with an application to leukocytes. J. Biomech. Eng. 112, 283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaner, K. S. and P. A. Valberg (1989). Viscoelasticity of F-actin measured with magnetic microparticles. J. Cell Biol. 109, 2233–2243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoller, J., K. Brandle and J. Bereiter-Hahn (1997). Cellular motility in vitro as revealed by scanning acoustic microscopy depends on cell-cell contacts. Cell Tissue Res. 290, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The SIMBIOS Centre, Department of Mathematics, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, Scotland

    A. Stéphanou & M. A. J. Chaplain

  2. Lab. TIMC-IMAG, Equipe DynaCell, UMR CNRS 5525, Institut Albert Bonniot, 38706, La Tronche Cedex, France

    A. Stéphanou & P. Tracqui

Authors
  1. A. Stéphanou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. A. J. Chaplain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Tracqui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Stéphanou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stéphanou, A., Chaplain, M.A.J. & Tracqui, P. A mathematical model for the dynamics of large membrane deformations of isolated fibroblasts. Bull. Math. Biol. 66, 1119–1154 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulm.2003.11.004

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulm.2003.11.004

Keywords

Search

Navigation