Skip to main content
Log in

Pairwise competition and the replicator equation

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spite in Hamilton’s sense is defined as the willingness to harm oneself in order to harm another more. The standard replicator dynamic predicts that evolutionarily stable strategies are payoff-maximizing equilibria of the underlying game, and hence rules out the evolution of spiteful behavior. We propose a modified replicator dynamic, where selection is based on local outcomes, rather than on the population ’state’, as in standard models. We show that under this new model spite can evolve readily. The new dynamic suggests conditions under which spite in animals might be found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Björnerstedt, J. and J. W. Weibull (1996). Nash equilibrium and evolution by imitation, in The Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior, Proceedings of the IEA Conf., Turin, Italy, K. J. Arrow, E. Colombatto, M. Perlman and C. Schmidt (Eds), New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, K. R., T. Wenseleers and F. L. W. Ratnieks (2001). Spite: Hamilton’s unproven theory. Ann. Zool. Fennici 38, 229–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadagkar, R. (1993). Can animals be spiteful? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8, 232–234. See also Keller, L., M. Milinski, M. Frischknecht, N. Perrin, H. Richner and F. Tripet (1994). Spiteful animals still to be discovered. ibid. 9, 103, and reply.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H. (2000). Game Theory Evolving, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1970). Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature 228, 1218–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer, J. and K. Sigmund (1998). Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton, N. and G. A. Parker (1979). An evolutionarily stable strategy approach to indiscriminate spite. Nature 279, 419–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J., K. Steiglitz and G. Reis (2003). The spite motive and equilibrium behavior in auctions. Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy 2, Article 5; http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/contributions/vol2/iss1/art5.

  • Rothstein, S. I. (1979). Gene frequencies and selection for inhibitory traits, with special emphasis on the adaptiveness of territoriality. Am. Nat. 113, 317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verner, J. (1977). On the adaptive significance of territoriality. Am. Nat. 111, 769–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weibull, J. W. (1995). Evolutionary Game Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken Steiglitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morgan, J., Steiglitz, K. Pairwise competition and the replicator equation. Bull. Math. Biol. 65, 1163–1172 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulm.2003.08.001

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulm.2003.08.001

Keywords

Navigation