Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Investigation on Wave Run-up Characteristics Along Columns and Air Gap Response of Semi-Submersible Platform

  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article mainly concentrates on a large-volume drilling semi-submersible platform, aiming to reveal wave run-up characteristics along square columns and give the relationship between air gap distributions and wave parameters. The tests with fixed model were conducted firstly on its encountering a series of monochromatic waves. A wide range of wave slope (H/L) were selected to investigate the air gap response in detail. As can be seen, larger wave steepness will generally cause smaller air gap in the same wave period, which indicates nonlinear effects of incoming wave can amplify wave elevation. Model tests with mooring condition were also conducted in the same wave conditions. As was expected, the maximum relative wave elevation reduces obviously compared with the fixed one. However, wave shape close to columns show higher harmonic characteristics due to interaction between waves and the columns of semi-submersible platform. Meaningful conclusions from the model tests are drawn in this article, which is helpful in air gap design of floating offshore platform to a certain extent. In addition, the experimental results will provide an important reference for further research on validation and update of theoretical models of air gap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. KAZEMI S., INCECIK A. Theoretical and experimental analysis of air gap response and wave-on-deck impact of floating offshore structures[C]. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. San Diego, California, USA, OMAE2007-29288, 2007, 297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  2. SWEETMAN B., WINTERSTEIN S. R. Air gap prediction: Use of second-order diffraction and multi-column models[C]. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Stavanger, Norway, 2001, 390–397.

    Google Scholar 

  3. DANMEIER D. G., SEAH R. K. M. and FINNIGAN T. et al. Validation of wave run-up calculation methods for a gravity based structure[C]. 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Estoril, Portugal, OMAE2008-57625, 2008, 265–274.

    Google Scholar 

  4. KRIEBEL D., WALLENDORF L. Air gap model tests on a MOB module[C]. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Stavanger, Norway, 2001, 286–293.

    Google Scholar 

  5. SIMOS A. N., SPARANO J. V. and ARANHA J. A. P. et al. 2nd order hydrodynamic effects on resonant heave, pitch and roll motions of a large-volume semi-submer-sible platform[C]. Proceeding of the 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Artic Engineering. Estoril, Portugal, OMAE2008-57430, 2008, 229–237.

    Google Scholar 

  6. KAZEMI S., INCECIK A. Numerical prediction of air gap response of floating offshore structures using direct boundary element method[C]. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Halkidiki, Greece, OMAE2005-67399, 2005, 803–809.

    Google Scholar 

  7. WANG Yan, YOU Yun-xiang. Numerical simulation of interaction of viscous wave fields with a semi-submersible platform[J]. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2009, 24(6): 793–799(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  8. DONG Zhi, ZHAN Jie-min. Numerical modeling of wave evolution and run-up in shallow water[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2009, 21(6): 731–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MATSUMTO F. T., WATAI R. A. and SIMOS A. N. Wave run-up and air gap prediction for a large-volume semi-submersible platform[C]. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Shanghai, China, OMAE2010-20165, 2010, 151–159.

    Google Scholar 

  10. LWANOWSKI B., WEMMENHOVE R. CFD simulation of wave run-up on a semi-submersible and comparsion with experiment[C]. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, OMAE2009-79052, 2009, 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  11. NIELSEN F. G. Comparative study on air gap under floating platforms and run-up along platform columns[J]. Marine Structures, 2003, 16(2): 97–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. LIN Chun-Yuan, HUANG Ching-Jer. Decomposition of incident and reflected higher harmonic waves using four wave gauges[J]. Coastal Engineering, 2004, 51(5–6): 395–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. MAVRAKOS S. A., CHATJIGEORGIOU I. K. and RIGOROPOULOS G. Scale experiment of motions and wave run-up on a TLP model, subjected to monochro-matic waves[C]. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Toulon, France, OMAE2004, 382–389.

    Google Scholar 

  14. MORRIS-THOMAS M. T., THIAGARAJAN K. P. The run-up on a cylinder in progressive surface gravity waves: Harmonic components[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2004, 26(3–4): 98–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. BOO S. Y. Measurements of higher harmonic wave forces on a vertical truncated circular cylinder[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2006, 33(2): 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tie-bing Shan.

Additional information

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 50879045, 50709019).

Biography: SHAN Tie-bing (1982-), Male, Ph. D. Candidate

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shan, Tb., Yang, Jm., Li, X. et al. Experimental Investigation on Wave Run-up Characteristics Along Columns and Air Gap Response of Semi-Submersible Platform. J Hydrodyn 23, 625–636 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60158-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60158-8

Key words

Navigation