Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Arctic policy of the North East Asian countries

  • Article
  • Published:
Jindal Global Law Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the significance of the Arctic is increasing in the modern world, the international community is facing some challenging tasks, which nowadays determine the essence and main areas of cooperation between the Arctic States and other interested actors in the region. The most important among them lies in determining basic characteristics of the multilateral governance of the Arctic and in improving mechanisms and procedures that already exist within the Arctic Council and other regional institutions and are intended to ensure its effective implementation. It is impossible to complete those tasks without determining the role and significance of non-Arctic States in shaping and implementing the Arctic agenda, the importance of which goes far beyond that region. Of utmost interest in that regard are the countries of North East Asia (China, Japan and South Korea), which in 2013 gained observer status in the Arctic Council as a result of which it now wields considerable influence over the Arctic Council. Therefore, the main goal of this article is to determine prerequisites for the formation, analysis of the current state and of the future development of the Arctic policy of China, Japan and South Korea as well as for the study of the possibility of their cooperation in that direction. Moreover, the paper provides a description of current opportunities of non-Arctic States to participate in institutional and rule-making mechanisms of the Arctic governance and analyses the impact that those countries have on increasing the efficiency of that process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Declaration on the Establishment of the Arctic Council, Ottawa, Canada. Sept. 19, 1996.

  2. The Svalbard Treaty, Paris, France, Feb. 9, 1920.

  3. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Montego Bay, 10 December 1982, in force 16 November 1994) 1833 UNTS 397.

  4. L.A. Matiyak, Arctic Stratagems of Beijing, 190 POWER 8 (2016).

  5. Valeriy P. Zhuravel, China, Republic of Korea and Japan in the Arctic: Politics, Economy, Security, 113 ARCTIC & THE NORTH 24 (2016).

  6. See Xue Long, Supply Ice-Strengthened Vessel, Mar. 28, 2015, http://www.korabli.eu/galleries/oboi/grazhdanskie-suda/xue-long.

  7. See Svargaman, China’s Policy in the Arctic, INT. AFF., Feb. 28, 2016.

  8. Matiyak, supra note 4, at 191.

  9. Asian Players in the Arctic: Interests, Opportunities, Prospects, 19–20 (Report No. 26/2016 RUSSIAN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS CPUNCIL (RIAC), 2016).

  10. See S.K. Pestsov, et al., International Cooperation in the Arctic: The Interests and Strategies of Countries of the Asia–Pacific Region, (Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnography of the peoples of the Far East, Far Eastern Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015).

  11. INSROP. Examples of Major Studies and Research and Development Implemented in the Past, http://www.sof.or.jp/en/activities/index6_1.php.

  12. See Arctic Council, Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment 2009 Report 47, Apr., 2009.

  13. JANSROP Phase II: A New Project on the NSR and the Related Issues. Examples of Major Studies and Research and Development Implemented in the Past, http://www.sof.or.jp/en/activities/index6_2.php.

  14. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, Launching of the “Arctic Task Force (ATF)”, Sept. 2, 2010, http://www.mofa.go.jp/announce/announce/2010/9/0902_01.html.

  15. NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE STUDIES, EAST ASIAN STRATEGIC REVIEW 2011: MAINTAINING THE ORDER IN THE ARCTIC OCEAN: COOPERATION AND CONFRONTATION AMONG COASTAL NATIONS, (NIDS, 2011) 83–84.

  16. Id., at 84.

  17. See National Security Strategy, Dec. 17, 2013, http://www.cas.go.jp/jp/siryou/131217anzenhoshou/nss-e.pdf.

  18. Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute (KORDI), Additional Information, 2005.

  19. Korea Polar Research Institute, Greetings, About KOPRI, 2006, http://www.kopri.re.kr/exclude/userIndex/engIndex.do.

  20. The Arctic Institute Center for Circumpolar Security Studies, History, 2002, http://www.thearcticinstitute.org/countries/south-korea/.

  21. Id.

  22. See Joseph Spears, China and the Arctic: The Awakening Snow Dragon, 9 (6) CHINA BRIEF (2009).

  23. The Observer Countries of the Arctic Council: The Position and Motives of Activity, 42 (CENTER FOR SSRATEGIC STUDIES AND PROJECTIONS, 2014).

  24. Stephen Blank, Exploring the Significance of China’s Membership on the Arctic Council, 12 CHINA BRIEF 14 (2013).

  25. Zhuravel, supra note 5, at 115.

  26. International Northern Sea Route (INSROP) Programme; Development and Operation Programme for Environmental Sustainability in East Eurasia (JANSROP Phase II).

  27. Fujio Ohnishi, The Process of Formulating Japan’s Arctic Policy: From Involvement to Engagement, 4 EAST ASIA-ARCTIC REL.: BOUNDARY, SECURITY & INT’L. POL. 1 (2013).

  28. Asian Players in the Arctic, supra note 9, at 45.

  29. Id., at 46.

  30. The Observer Countries of the Arctic Council, supra note 23, at 69.

  31. Nikkei, Japan wants to energy cooperation with Russia, UTRO.RU, Sept. 1, 2016.

  32. Jasmin Sinclair, Japan and the Arctic: Not So Poles Apart, 44 JOGMEC 2 (2014), https://oilgas-info.jogmec.go.jp/pdf/5/5225/201403_039a.pdf.

  33. L. Rudenko, China – Arab East: The Economic Interdependence Increases, 2013.

  34. Korea National Oil Corporation, The North East Asia Oil Hub, April 5, 2016.

  35. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Kyoto, Japan. Dec. 11, 1997.

  36. S. Guanmyao, Interests and Politics of China in the Arctic: History, Legal Framework and Implementation, 53 WORLD ECON. & INT’L REL. 2 (2016).

  37. CAA, About Us, CHINESE ARCTIC & ANTARCTIC ADMIN. (2016), http://www.chinare.gov.cn/en/index.html?pid=about.

  38. See Linda Jakobson, Сhina prepares for an ice-free Аrctic, SIPRI INSIGHTS ON PEACE AND SECURITY (No. 2010/2 March 2010), http://www.polar-academy.com/Publication/SIPRIInsight1002(2). pdf.

  39. See Linda Jakobson Linda & Jingchao Peng, China's Arctic Aspirations, SIPRI POLICY PAPER (No. 34, November 2012), http://books.sipri.org/product_info?c_product_id=449.

  40. Guanmyao, supra note 36, at 59.

  41. See Communist Party of China, Report to the Eighteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China, Nov. 8, 2012.

  42. Jakobson & Peng, supra note 39.

  43. Guanmyao, supra note 36, at 59.

  44. See Japan Consortium for Arctic Environmental Research, Long-Term Plan for Arctic Environmental Research, Nov. 2014.

  45. Cabinet of Ministers, Basic Plan on Ocean Policy, Apr. 2013.

  46. Id.

  47. Headquarters For Ocean Policy, Japan’s Arctic Policy, Oct. 16, 2015.

  48. See Hideki Asari, Recommendations for Japan’s Diplomacy on Arctic Governance and Japan’s Diplomatic Strategy, JAPAN INST. INT’L AFF. (2013).

  49. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries; Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning; Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy; Ministry of the Environment; Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; Korea Meteorological Administration and some others.

  50. See Korea Maritime Institute, Korea Polar Research Institute, Korea Institute of Geoscience & Mineral Resources etc. Arctic Policy of the Republic of Korea, 2013.

  51. Id.

  52. See Declaration on the Establishment of the Arctic Council, Ottawa, Canada. September 19, 1996.

  53. See Kiruna Declaration, Kiruna, Sweden, May 15, 2013.

  54. See Arctic Council Rules of Procedure. Adopted by the Arctic Council at the First Arctic Council Ministerial Meeting, Iqaluit, Canada. September 17–18, 1998; Revised by the Arctic Council at the Eighth Arctic Council Ministerial Meeting, Kiruna, Sweden. May 15, 2013. Annex 2.

  55. Id.

  56. See Arctic Council Observer Manual for Subsidiary Bodies. Kiruna, Sweden. May 15, 2013; Addendum, Anchorage, USA. Oct. 20–22, 2015.

  57. See V.V. Gavrilov, The LOSC and the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf in the Arctic Ocean, 31 (2) INT’L. J. MARINE & COASTAL L. 315–338 (2016).

  58. NOVATEK Concludes Framework Agreement on CNPC’s Entrance into Yamal LNG, NOVATEK PRESS CENTER, Jun. 21, 2013.

  59. “Gazprom” and CNPC Signed an Agreement on Cross-Border Section of “Power of Siberia” and Other Documents in the Development of Cooperation, GAZPROM. PRESS CENTER, Dec.17, 2015.

  60. Oil, Gas, Coal. No 404073, BARENTSOBSERVER, Sept. 8, 2011.

  61. See V. Konyshev & A. Sergunin, Strategy of Northeast Asia Countries in the Arctic, 35–48 PROBLEMS OF THE FAR EAST 6 (2012).

  62. Bilateral cooperation in the sphere of transport, THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

  63. The Observer Countries of the Arctic Council, supra note 23, at 70.

  64. Mia Bennet, South Korea’s Growing Role in Arctic Economic Development, FOREIGN POLICY ASSOCIATION, Apr. 20, 2011.

  65. Vladimir Terekhov, About the Sino-Japanese “side” of the triangle “Russia-China-Japan”, NEW EASTERN OUTLOOK, Sept. 25, 2016.

  66. Id.

  67. Joint Declaration on the Promotion of Tripartite Cooperation among the People's Republic of China, Japan and the Republic of Korea, Bali, Oct. 7, 2003.

  68. See Vyacheslav Gavrilov, Framework of the ASEAN Plus Three Mechanisms Operating in the Sphere of Economic Cooperation 44–45 (Cale Dicussion Paper No. 7, 2011).

  69. Stanislav Varivoda, South Korea, China and Japan were able to resolve some of the differences at the summit in Seoul, TASS: RUSSIAN NEWS AGENCY, Nov. 01, 2015.

  70. Alexander Kovalev, China, Japan and South Korea will hold a round of talks on the Arctic on 28 April, RUSSIAN INFORMATION AGEMCY, Apr., 25, 2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of International Public and Private Law, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia

    Viatcheslav Gavrilov

  2. School of Law, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia

    Alexandra Kripakova

Authors
  1. Viatcheslav Gavrilov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexandra Kripakova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viatcheslav Gavrilov.

Additional information

Viatcheslav Gavrilov—Professor of Law, Head.

Alexandra Kripakova—Lecturer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gavrilov, V., Kripakova, A. Arctic policy of the North East Asian countries. Jindal Global Law Review 8, 69–86 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-017-0039-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-017-0039-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation