Skip to main content
Log in

Protein Sparing Effect of Dietary Rumen Protected Lysine Plus Methionine in Growing Murrah Buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protein sparing effect of dietary supplemented amino acids was evaluated in Murrah buffalo calves (n = 18; 7–14 months of age and 143.66 kg average body weight) assigned into three similar groups. Animals in the first group (T1) were fed on a diet having 140 g/kg crude protein (CP), and groups second (T2) and third (T3) were fed with 120 g/kg CP. Calves of group T3 were further supplemented with 2 g rumen protected- methionine and 17 g lysine for 90 days. CP intake was higher (P < 0.01) in group T1 than other two groups. Apparent digestibilities of nutrients were similar among the three groups. Nitrogen balance was higher (P < 0.05) by 21.33 and 23.35 % in groups T3 and T1, respectively, than group T2. Average daily gain (ADG) and feed efficiency was higher (P < 0.05) in group T3 than group T2. Blood concentration of urea nitrogen and non-esterified fatty acids were lower (P < 0.05) in groups T2 and T3 than that of T1, with an elevated plasma level of lysine and methionine in group T3. Thus, a reduction in dietary CP from 140 to 120 g/kg resulted in lower (P < 0.05) ADG and N retention, which were improved on dietary fortification with rumen protected lysine plus methionine, hence proving their protein sparing effect in growing Murrah buffaloes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Recktenwald EB, Ross DA, Fessenden SW, Wall CJ, Van Amburgh ME (2014) Urea-N recycling in lactating dairy cows fed diets with 2 different levels of dietary crude protein and starch with or without monensin. J Dairy Sci 97:1611–1622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahesh MS, Mohini M (2013) Biological treatment of crop residues for ruminant feeding: a review. Afr J Biotechnol 12:4221–4231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. NRC (2001) Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, Seventh revised edn. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schwab CG (2011) Feed supplements: ruminally protected amino acids. In: Fuquay JW, Fox PF, McSweeney PLH (eds) Encyclopedia of dairy sciences, 2nd edn. Elsevier, California, pp 389–395

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Archibeque SL, Burns JC, Huntington GB (2002) Nitrogen metabolism of beef steers fed endophyte free tall fescue hay: effects of ruminally protected methionine supplementation. J Anim Sci 80:1344–1351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gajera AP, Dutta KS, Savsani HH, Parsana DK, Vataliya PH, Sipai SH, Ribadiya NK (2013) Effect of rumen protected lysine, methionine and fat on nutrients utilisation in growing Jaffrabadi heifers. Indian J Anim Nutr 30:351–357

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin C, Mirande C, Morgavi DP, Forano E, Devillard E, Mosoni P (2013) Methionine analogues HMB and HMBi increase the abundance of cellulolytic bacterial representatives in the rumen of cattle with no direct effects on fibre degradation. Anim Feed Sci Technol 182:16–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arewad GR, Thube HA, Pandya PR, Parnerkar S, Shankhpal S (2011) Effect of feeding bypass protein based total mixed ration on performance of growing crossbred calves. Indian J Anim Nutr 28:303–308

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sai S, Thakur SS, Kewalramani N, Chaurasia M (2014) Effect of supplementation of rumen protected methionine plus lysine on growth performance, nutrient utilisation and some blood metabolites in calves. Indian J Anim Nutr 31:1–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson PH, Chalupa W, Sniffen CJ, Sato H, Fujieda T, Ueda T, Suzuki H (2004) Influence of ingredient reformulation to reduce diet crude protein level on productivity, and efficiency of dietary nitrogen use, in early lactation dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol 116:67–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Socha MT, Putnam DE, Garthwaite BD, Whitehouse NL, Kierstead NA, Schwab CG, Ducharme GA, Robert JC (2005) Improving intestinal amino acid supply of pre- and postpartum dairy cows with rumen-protected methionine and lysine. J Dairy Sci 88:1113–1126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xue F, Zhou Z, Ren L, Meng Q (2011) Influence of rumen-protected lysine supplementation on growth performance and plasma amino acid concentrations in growing cattle offered the maize stalk silage/maize grain-based diet. Anim Feed Sci Technol 169:61–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Movaliya JK, Padodara RJ, Bhadaniya AR, Savsani HH (2013) Effect of bypass methionine- lysine supplementation on haematologocal and biochemical parameters of Jaffrabadi heifers. Vet World 6:147–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bach A, Marshall DS (2000) Measuring resistance to ruminal degradation and bioavailability of ruminally protected methionine. Anim Feed Sci Technol 84:23–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Socha MT, Schwab CG, Putnam DE, Whitehouse NL, Garthwaite BD, Ducharme GA (2008) Extent of methionine limitation in peak-, early-, and mid-lactation dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 91:1996–2010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. ICAR (2013) Nutrient requirements of cattle and buffalo. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  17. AOAC (2005) Official methods of analysis, 18th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  18. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods of dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma VC, Mahesh MS, Mohini M, Datt C, Nampoothiri VM (2014) Nutrient utilisation and methane emissions in Sahiwal calves differing in residual feed intake. Arch Anim Nutr 68:345–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shipe WF, Senyk GF, Fountain KB (1980) Modified copper soap solvent extraction method for measuring free fatty acids in milk. J Dairy Sci 63:193–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. SAS (2003) User’s guide: statistics, Version 9.1, statistical analysis system. SAS Institute, Cary, New York

  22. Allen MS (2000) Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 83:1598–1624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Spanghero M, Kowalski ZM (1997) Critical analysis of nitrogen balance experiments in lactating cows. Livest Sci 52:113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McCollum MQ, Vazquez-Aonn M, Dibner JJ, Webb KE (2000) Absorption of 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid by isolated sheep ruminal and omasal epithelia. J Anim Sci 78:1078–1083

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vahora SG, Parnerkar S, Kore KB (2012) Effect of feeding bypass nutrients to growing buffalo heifers under field conditions. Livest Res Rural Develop 24, 39. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/2/vaho24024.htm

  26. Abdelrahman MM (2010) Productivity of growing Baladi kids fed high energy and protected methionine. Egypt J Sheep Goat Sci 5:233–247

    Google Scholar 

  27. Singh S, Kushwaha BP, Maity SB, Singh KK, Das N (2015) Effect of dietary protein on intake, nutrients utilisation, nitrogen balance, blood metabolites, growth and puberty in growing Bhadawari buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) heifers. Trop Anim Health Prod 47:213–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Auboiron SD, Durand D, Bauchart D, Robert JC, Chapman MJ (1995) Lipoprotein metabolism in the preruminant calf: effect of a high fat diet supplemented with L-methionine. J Dairy Sci 77:1870–1881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Veira DM, Seoane JR, Proulx JG (1991) Utilisation of grass silage by growing cattle: effect of a supplement containing ruminally protected amino acids. J Anim Sci 69:4703–4709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors thank the Director, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute for providing necessary facilities to carry out the present research work. Critical and constructive suggestions of anonymous reviewers helped in substantial improvements in the quality of this paper, which is highly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Mahesh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest associated with this publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gami, R., Thakur, S.S. & Mahesh, M.S. Protein Sparing Effect of Dietary Rumen Protected Lysine Plus Methionine in Growing Murrah Buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 87, 885–891 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-0662-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-0662-2

Keywords

Navigation