Abstract
Assessment practices that aim to promote both quality and equity may be compromised in a higher education market where students are consumers and grades the currency exchanged for measures of success. In such a climate, academics report feeling pressured to make course content and assessment less challenging in order to obtain positive student evaluations, and they may lose faith in university quality assurance processes that seem focused on ensuring student satisfaction with education as a product. To explore these issues from the perspectives of the main stakeholders in assessment, this paper investigates assessment perceptions of students, course coordinators, and faculty Associate Deans responsible for teaching and learning at The University of Queensland. The findings highlight differences in what these groups consider to be important assessment issues and differences in how they should be addressed. First year students are identified as a disadvantaged group due to perceptions of the role of feedback and formative assessment that may be influenced by their secondary school assessment experiences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, D., Johnson, R., & Saha, L. (2002). Changes in academic work: Implications for universities of the changing age distribution and work roles of academic staff. Available online: http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/otherpub/academic_work.pdf.
Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) (2007). Australian Survey of Student Engagement (AUSSE). University report. Available online: http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/AUSSE_2008AustralasiaUniversity-ReportResults.pdf.
Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: contradictory or complementary? In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 35–48). London: Kogan Page.
Boud, D. (1998). Assessment and learning—Unlearning bad habits of assessment. Paper presented at the Effective Assessment at University Conference, Brisbane, Queensland.
Coates, H. (2005). The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1), 25–36.
Elander, J., Harrington, K., Norton, L., Robinson, H., & Reddy, P. (2006). Complex skills and academic writing: A review of evidence about the types of learning required to meet core assessment criteria. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 71–90.
Goos, M., & Hughes, C. (2010). An investigation of the confidence levels of course/subject coordinators in undertaking aspects of their assessment responsibilities. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 315–324.
Goos, M., Hughes, C., & Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Building capacity for assessment leadership via professional development and mentoring of course coordinators. ALTC Teaching Fellowship Report, June 2009. Available www.altc.edu.au/resource-building-capacity-goos-uq-2009.
Hutchings, P., Huber, M. T., & Golde, C. M. (2006). Professional development for a changing academy. Stanford, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching in partnership with the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
James, R., McInnis, C., & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education and AUTC.
Kift, S. (2008). The next, great first year challenge: Sustaining, coordinating and embedding coherent institution-wide approaches to enact the FYE as “everybody’s business”. In 11th international Pacific Rim first year in higher education conference, an apple for the learner: celebrating the first year experience, 2008, Hobart.
Kift, S. (2009). A transition pedagogy for first year curriculum design and renewal. Keynote address delivered at the FYE Curriculum Design Symposium, QUT, 5 February 2009. Available online: http://www.fyecd2009.qut.edu.au/resources/PRE_SallyKift_5Feb09.pdf.
Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Orrell, J. (2003). Congruence and disjunctions between academics’ thinking when assessing and their beliefs about assessment practice. Paper presented at the 11th International Improving Student Learning Symposium, Leicestershire, UK.
Price, M. (2005). Assessment standards: The role of communities of practice and the scholarship of assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), 215–230.
Prosser, M., Ramsden, P., Trigwell, K., & Martin, E. (2003). Dissonance in experience of teaching and its relation to the quality of student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 28(1), 37–48.
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge-Falmer.
Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 387–415.
Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. (2002). Identifying academics’ orientations to assessment practice. Higher Education, 43(2), 173–201.
Smith, D., & Lovat, T. (2003). Curriculum: Action on reflection (4th ed.). Sydney: Social Science Press.
Taylor, J., & Healy, A. (2009). Assessment: A tool for transition. Presentation delivered at the FYE Curriculum Design Symposium, QUT, 5 February 2009. Available online: http://www.fyecd2009.qut.edu.au/resources/PRE_Healy&Taylor_5Feb09.pdf.
Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2008). The first year experience of higher education in the UK. Final report. Heslington, York: Higher Education Academy.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the Australian Learning and Teaching Council Ltd, an initiative of the Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goos, M., Gannaway, D. & Hughes, C. Assessment as an equity issue in higher education: comparing the perceptions of first year students, course coordinators, and academic leaders. Aust. Educ. Res. 38, 95–107 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-010-0008-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-010-0008-2