Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis in children

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for acute appendicitis in children.

Methods

This study was conducted as a retrospective comparison of hospital records for postoperative complications, duration of operation, and postoperative length of stay between children (aged <18y) who underwent laparoscopic (n=190) or open (n=199) appendectomy over a six-year period. Quality of life was evaluated immediately and 1 month postoperatively.

Results

The major complication rate after surgery in laparoscopic group was significantly lower than that of open appendectomy group (13% vs 27%, P<0.05). The mean (SD) postoperative hospital stay was also shorter in laparoscopic group (2.4 (0.6) days vs 3.7 (1.1) days, P<0.05). The postoperative minor complication rate and hospital expenses were not significantly different between the two groups. The duration of surgery was longer in laparoscopic group (P<0.05). Children in laparoscopic group had less postoperative pain and higher quality of life after one month than those in open appendectomy group.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic technique seems to be safer than open appendectomy for acute appendicitis in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Surgical Research Collaborative. Multicentre observational study of performance variation in provision and outcome of emergency appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1240–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Markides G, Subar D, Riyad K. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2010;34:2026–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brugger L, Rosella L, Candinas D, Guller U. Improving outcomes after laparoscopic appendectomy: A populationbased, 12-year trend analysis of 7446 patients. Ann Surg. 2011;253:309–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications:a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form-Health-Survey (SF-36), I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care. 1992;30:473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan W J, Pek W, Kabir T, Chan WH, Wong WK, Ong HS. Clinical outcome and cost comparison between laparoscopic and open appendicectomy. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2014;43:464–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartin MK, Kemik O, Caparlar MA, Bostanci MT, Oner MO. Evaluation of the open and laparoscopic appendectomy operations with respect to their effect on serum IL-6 levels. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2016;22:466–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Biondi A, Di Stefano C, Ferrara F, Bellia A, Vacante M, Piazza L. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and costeffectiveness. World J Emerg Surg. 2016;11:44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Aly OE, Black DH, Rehman H, Ahmed I. Single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional threeport laparoscopic appendicectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2016;35:120–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Far SS, Miraj S. Single-incision laparoscopy surgery: a systematic review. Electron Physician. 2016;8:3088–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Xiao Y, Shi G, Zhang J, Cao JG, Liu LJ, Chen TH, et al. Surgical site infection after laparoscopic and open appendectomy: A multicenter large consecutive cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1384–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Karakus O Z, Ulusoy O, Ates O, Hakguder G, Olguner M, Akgur FM. Conventional single-port laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis in children: Efficient and cost-effective. J Minim Access Surg. 2016;12:16–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Towfigh S, Chen F, Mason R, Katkhouda N, Chan L, Berne T. Laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces length of stay for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:495–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ikeda H, Ishimaru Y, Takayasu H, Okamura K, Kisaki Y, Fujino J. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children with uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39:1680–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Menezes M, Das L, Alagtal M, Haroun J, Puri P. Laparoscopic appendectomy is recommended for the treatment of complicated appendicitis in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008;24:303–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengmin Cui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Cui, Z. & Zhang, R. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis in children. Indian Pediatr 54, 938–941 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-017-1186-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-017-1186-z

Keywords

Navigation