Skip to main content
Log in

Esophagojejunal anastomotic fistula: a major issue after radical total gastrectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gastric cancer surgery has evolved considerably over the past years, with substantial improvement on outcomes. Meanwhile, esophagojejunal anastomotic fistula (EJF) continues to impair postoperative results. This study aimed to assess EJF regarding its incidence, risk factors, management and the impact on overall survival. We retrospectively analyzed 258 consecutive patients who underwent total or completion gastrectomy for GC from 2009 and 2017. Clinicopathological characteristics analysis was performed comparing patients who developed EJF with patients with other clinical or surgical complications, as well as patients without any postoperative complications. Fifteen (5.8%) patients had EJF and 81 (31.4%) had other complications (including other surgical fistulas). The median time of EJF diagnosis was on the eighth postoperative day (range 3–76). Completion gastrectomy (p = 0.048) and longer hospital stay (p < 0.001) were associated with the occurrence of EJF. The surgical mortality of patients with EJF was higher than in non-EJF patients (26.7% vs. 4.5%; p < 0.001). Nine patients were treated conservatively and six required surgery. The mortality rate of EJF was 11.1% and 50% in patients who underwent conservative and surgical treatment, respectively. Patients with other complications and patients with EJF had worse survival compared to patients without any complication (p = 0.004 and p = 0.013, respectively). Completion gastrectomy is the main risk factor for EJF occurrence. Still, EJF is associated with high postoperative mortality, longer hospital stay and has a negative impact on long-term survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barchi LC, Jacob CE, Bresciani CJ, Yagi OK, Mucerino DR, Lopasso FP et al (2016) Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: time to change the paradigm. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 29(2):117–120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoo HM, Lee HH, Shim JH, Jeon HM, Park CH, Song KY (2011) Negative impact of leakage on survival of patients undergoing curative resection for advanced gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 104(7):734–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gong W, Li J (2017) Combat with esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a critical review of the literature. Int J Surg. 47:18–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Washington K (2010) 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol 17(12):3077–3079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Irlbeck T, Zwißler B, Bauer A (2017) ASA classification: transition in the course of time and depiction in the literature. Anaesthesist 66(1):5–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zilberstein B, Malheiros C, Lourenço LG, Kassab P, Jacob CE, Weston AC et al (2013) Brazilian consensus in gastric cancer: guidelines for gastric cancer in Brazil. Arq Bras Cir Dig 26(1):2–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Association JGC (2017) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer 20(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zilberstein B, Jacob CE, Barchi LC, Yagi OK, Ribeiro U, Coimbra BG et al (2014) Simplified technique for reconstruction of the digestive tract after total and subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Arq Bras Cir Dig 27(2):133–137

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hyodo M, Hosoya Y, Hirashima Y, Haruta H, Kurashina K, Saito S et al (2007) Minimum leakage rate (0.5%) of stapled esophagojejunostomy with sacrifice of a small part of the jejunum after total gastrectomy in 390 consecutive patients. Dig Surg 24(3):169–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deguchi Y, Fukagawa T, Morita S, Ohashi M, Saka M, Katai H (2012) Identification of risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after gastric surgery. World J Surg 36(7):1617–1622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aurello P, Magistri P, D’Angelo F, Valabrega S, Sirimarco D, Tierno SM et al (2015) Treatment of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage: a systematic review from the last two decades. Am Surg 81(5):450–453

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lang H, Piso P, Stukenborg C, Raab R, Jähne J (2000) Management and results of proximal anastomotic leaks in a series of 1114 total gastrectomies for gastric carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 26(2):168–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meyer L, Meyer F, Dralle H, Ernst M, Lippert H, Gastinger I et al (2005) Insufficiency risk of esophagojejunal anastomosis after total abdominal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 390(6):510–516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Selby LV, Vertosick EA, Sjoberg DD, Schattner MA, Janjigian YY, Brennan MF et al (2015) Morbidity after total gastrectomy: analysis of 238 patients. J Am Coll Surg 220(5):863–871

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nomura S, Sasako M, Katai H, Sano T, Maruyama K (2000) Decreasing complication rates with stapled esophagojejunostomy following a learning curve. Gastric Cancer 3(2):97–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Masoomi H, Kim H, Reavis KM, Mills S, Stamos MJ, Nguyen NT (2011) Analysis of factors predictive of gastrointestinal tract leak in laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. Arch Surg 146(9):1048–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takeuchi M, Ishii K, Seki H, Yasui N, Sakata M, Shimada A et al (2016) Excessive visceral fat area as a risk factor for early postoperative complications of total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Surg 16(1):54

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Budisin N, Budisin E, Golubovic A (2001) Early complications following total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 77(1):35–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Takahashi H (2006) Total gastrectomy of gastric stump carcinomas is more invasive than usual total gastrectomy for gastric carcinomas. Masui 55(1):79–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barchi LC, Charruf AZ, de Oliveira RJ, Jacob CE, Cecconello I, Zilberstein B (2016) Management of postoperative complications of lymphadenectomy. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 1:92

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Barchi LC, Ramos MFKP, Dias AR, Yagi OK, Ribeiro-Júnior U, Zilberstein B et al (2019) Total omentectomy in gastric cancer surgery: Is it always necessary? Arq Bras Cir Dig 32(1):e1425

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramos MFKP, Pereira MA, Charruf AZ, Dias AR, Castria TB, Barchi LC et al (2019) Conversion therapy for gastric cancer: expanding the treatment possibilities. Arq Bras Cir Dig 32(2):e1435

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Busweiler LAD, Dikken JL, Henneman D, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Ho VKY, Tollenaar RAEM et al (2017) The influence of a composite hospital volume on outcomes for gastric cancer surgery: a Dutch population-based study. J Surg Oncol 115(6):738–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pasquer A, Renaud F, Hec F, Gandon A, Vanderbeken M, Drubay V et al (2016) Is centralization needed for esophageal and gastric cancer patients with low operative risk?: A nationwide study. Ann Surg 264(5):823–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sano T, Katai H, Sasako M, Maruyama K (2002) One thousand consecutive gastrectomies without operative mortality. Br J Surg 89(1):123

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tu RH, Lin JX, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB et al (2017) Development of a nomogram for predicting the risk of anastomotic leakage after a gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(2):485–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Onodera H, Ikeuchi D, Nagayama S, Imamura M (2004) Weakness of anastomotic site in diabetic rats is caused by changes in the integrity of newly formed collagen. Dig Surg 21(2):146–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim SH, Son SY, Park YS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage: a retrospective cohort study in a single gastric surgical unit. J Gastric Cancer 15(3):167–175

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Girard E, Messager M, Sauvanet A, Benoist S, Piessen G, Mabrut JY et al (2014) Anastomotic leakage after gastrointestinal surgery: diagnosis and management. J Visc Surg 151(6):441–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Migita K, Takayama T, Matsumoto S, Wakatsuki K, Enomoto K, Tanaka T et al (2012) Risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 16(9):1659–1665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Selby LV, Gennarelli RL, Schnorr GC, Solomon SB, Schattner MA, Elkin EB et al (2017) Association of hospital costs with complications following total gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surg 152(10):953–958

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Carboni F, Valle M, Federici O, Levi Sandri GB, Camperchioli I, Lapenta R et al (2016) Esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage after total gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: options of treatment. J Gastrointest Oncol. 7(4):515–522

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Dasari BV, Neely D, Kennedy A, Spence G, Rice P, Mackle E et al (2014) The role of esophageal stents in the management of esophageal anastomotic leaks and benign esophageal perforations. Ann Surg 259(5):852–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ramos MF, Martins BAC, Alves AM, Maluf-Filho F, Ribeiro-Júnior U, Zilberstein B et al (2015) Endoscopic stent for treatment of esophagojejunostomy fistula. Arq Bras Cir Dig 28(3):216–217

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Turkyilmaz A, Eroglu A, Aydin Y, Kurt A, Bilen Y, Karaoglanoglu N (2010) Complications of metallic stent placement in malignant esophageal stricture and their management. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20(1):10–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Weidenhagen R, Gruetzner KU, Wiecken T, Spelsberg F, Jauch KW (2008) Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a new method. Surg Endosc 22(8):1818–1825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pournaras DJ, Hardwick RH, Safranek PM, Sujendran V, Bennett J, Macaulay GD et al (2018) Endoluminal vacuum therapy (E-Vac): a treatment option in oesophagogastric surgery. World J Surg 42(8):2507–2511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Messager M, Warlaumont M, Renaud F, Marin H, Branche J, Piessen G et al (2017) Recent improvements in the management of esophageal anastomotic leak after surgery for cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(2):258–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Oh SJ, Choi WB, Song J, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH et al (2009) Complications requiring reoperation after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: 17 years experience in a single institute. J Gastrointest Surg 13(2):239–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Li QG, Li P, Tang D, Chen J, Wang DR (2013) Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival after radical resection for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 19(25):4060–4065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Sierzega M, Kolodziejczyk P, Kulig J, Group PGCS (2010) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival after total gastrectomy for carcinoma of the stomach. Br J Surg 97(7):1035–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Aloia TA, Zimmitti G, Conrad C, Gottumukalla V, Kopetz S, Vauthey JN (2014) Return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT): a novel metric for evaluating the quality of oncosurgical therapy for malignancy. J Surg Oncol 110(2):107–114

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Ramos MFKP, Pereira MA, Barchi LC, Yagi OK, Dias AR, Szor DJ et al (2018) Duodenal fistula: the most lethal surgical complication in a case series of radical gastrectomy. Int J Surg. 53:366–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank other members of the service involved in gastric cancer treatment: Donato R. Mucerino, Carlos E. Jacob (im memoriam), Osmar K. Yagi, Claudio J.C. Bresciani, Marcelo Mester, Amir Charruf, Cynthia Chiaradia, Rodrigo Jose de Oliveira and Fabio P. Lopasso.

Funding

This study was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LCB and MFKPR: study design, data retrieval, critical analysis, and draft of the manuscript. MAP: data retrieval and statistical analysis. ARD: data retrieval and review of the manuscript. URJ, BZ, and IC: critical analysis and review of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leandro Cardoso Barchi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All the authors are committed to the Committee on Publication Ethics guidelines and declare that this article has not been submitted to another journal.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent is not required for this type of study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 61 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barchi, L.C., Ramos, M.F.K.P., Pereira, M.A. et al. Esophagojejunal anastomotic fistula: a major issue after radical total gastrectomy. Updates Surg 71, 429–438 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-019-00659-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-019-00659-8

Keywords

Navigation