Abstract
This paper describes the output of a study to tackle the problem of gang-related crime in the UK; we present the intelligence and routinely-gathered data available to a UK regional police force, and describe an initial social network analysis of gangs in the Greater Manchester area of the UK between 2000 and 2006. By applying social network analysis techniques, we attempt to detect the birth of two new gangs based on local features (modularity, cliques) and global features (clustering coefficients). Thus for the future, identifying the changes in these can help us identify the possible birth of new gangs (sub-networks) in the social system. Furthermore, we study the dynamics of these networks globally and locally, and have identified the global characteristics that tell us that they are not random graphs—they are small world graphs—implying that the formation of gangs is not a random event. However, we are not yet able to conclude anything significant about scale-free characteristics due to insufficient sample size. A final analysis looks at gang roles and develops further insight into the nature of the different link types, referring to Klerks’ ’third generation’ analysis, as well as a brief discussion of the potential UK policy applications of this work.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert R, Barabási AL (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74(1):47–91
Albert R, Albert I, Nakarado GL (2004) Structural vulnerability of the North American Power Grid. Phys Rev E 69(2)
Aldridge J, Medina-Ariza J, Ralphs R (2008) Street Gangs, Migration and Ethnicity, Willan, chap Dangers and Problems of Doing ’Gang’ Research in the UK, pp 31–46
Andamic LA, Lukose RM, Huberman B (2003) Handbook of graphs and networks: from the genome to the internet, chap Local Search in Unstructured Networks, Wiley pp 295–317
Baron SW, Tindall DB (1993) Network structure and delinquent attitudes within a Juvenile Gang. Soc Netw 15(3):255–273
Barrows J, Huff CR (2009) Gangs and Public Policy: Constructing and Deconstructing Gang Databases. Criminol Public Policy 8(4):675–703
Batchelor S (2009) Girls, gangs and violence: Assessing the evidence. Probat J 56(4):399–414
BBC News (2003) Gangs and guns - who takes the rap? http://www.bbc.co.uk/manchester/have_your_say/2003/01/06/gun_crime.shtml. Accessed 01 May 2015
BBC News (2004) Gun gang members ‘die by age 24’. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/3907049.stm. Accessed 01 May 2015
BBC News (2010) Greater Manchester gun crime down by 20%. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-11563463. Accessed 01 May 2015
Bjerregaard B, Lizotte AJ (1995) Gun ownership and gang membership. J Crim Law Criminol 86(1):37–58
Borgatti SP, Everett MG (2000) Models of core/periphery structures. Soc Netw 21(4):375–395
Bricknell S (2008) Criminal use of handguns in Australia. Australian Institute of Criminology, no, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, p 361
Bullock K, Tilley N (2002) Shootings, gangs and violent incidents in manchester: developing a crime reduction strategy. Crime Reduction Research Series CRRS13, UK Home Office
Bullock K, Tilley N (2009) Evidence-based policing and crime reduction. Policing 3(4):381–387
Burnap P, Williams ML, Sloan L, Rana OF, Housley W, Edwards A, Knight V, Procter R, Voss A (2014) Tweeting the terror: modelling the social media reaction to the Woolwich terrorist attack. Soc Netw Anal Mining 4(1):206
Calvó-Armengol A, Zenou Y (2004) Social networks and crime decisions: the role of social structure in facilitating delinquent behavior. Int Econ Rev 45(3):939–958
Calvó-Armengol A, Verdier T, Zenou Y (2007) Strong and weak ties in employment and crimes. J Pub Econ 91(1–2):203–233
Clauset A, Shalizi CR, Newman MEJ (2009) Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev 51(4):661–703
Costa LF, Rodrigues FA, Travieso G, Villas Boas PR (2007) Characterization of complex networks: a survey of measurements. Adv Phys 56(1):167–242
Duijn PAC, Kashirin V, Sloot PMA (2014) The relative ineffectiveness of criminal network disruption. Sci Reports 4(4238). doi:10.1038/srep04238
Ferrara E, De Meo P, Catanese S, Fiumara G (2014) Detecting criminal organizations in mobile phone networks. Exp Syst Appl 41(13):5733–5750
Golding B, McClory J (2008) Getting to the point—Reducing gun and knife crime in Britain: lessons from abroad. Tech. rep, Policy Exchange. ISBN 978-1-906097-39-4
Goldstein ML, Morris SA, Yen GG (2004) Problems with fitting to the power-law distribution. Eur Phys J B Conden Matter Comp Syst 41(2):255–258
Hales G, Lewis C, Silverstone D (2006) Gun Crime: the market in and use of illegal firearms. Home Office Research Study 298, UK Home Office
Hallsworth S, Silverstone D (2009) ‘That’s life innit’ A British perspective on guns, crime and social order. Criminol Crim Just 9(3):359–377
Hansen LL (2005) Girl “Crew” members doing gender, boy “crew” members doing violence: an ethnographic and network analysis of Maria Hinojosa’s New York gangs. West Crim Rev 6(1):134–144
Hill KG, Lui C, Hawkins JD (2001) Early precursors of gang membership: a study of Seattle Youth. Juvenile Justice Bulletin
Hughes LA (2005) Studying youth gangs: alternative methods and conclusions. J Contemp Crim Justice 21(2):98–119
Hutchins CE, Benham-Hutchins M (1995) Hiding in plain sight: criminal network analysis. Comput Math Organ Theory 16(1):89–111
Jackson MO (2010) Social and economic networks. Princeton University Press
Jacobs JB (2009) Gang databases: context and questions. Criminol Public Policy 8(4):705–709
Klerks P (2001) The network paradigm applied to criminal organizations. Connections 24(3):53–65
Liu W, Pellegrini M, Wang X (2014) Detecting communities based on network topology. Sci Reports 4(5739)
Lo TW (2011) Triadization of youth gangs in Hong Kong. Br J Criminol 52(3):556–576
Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45(2):167–256
Oatley G, Crick T (2014a) Changing faces: identifying complex behavioural profiles. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Human Aspects of Information Security, Privacy and Trust (HAS 2014), Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8533, pp 282–293
Oatley G, Crick T (2014b) Exploring UK Crime Networks. In: 2014 International Symposium on Foundations of Open Source Intelligence and Security Informatics (FOSINT-SI 2014), IEEE Press
Oatley G, Crick T (2014c) Measuring UK Crime Gangs. In: 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2014), IEEE Press
Oatley G, Zeleznikow J, Leary R, Ewart B (2005) From links to meaning: a Burglary Data Case Study. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2005), Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3684, pp 813–822
Oatley G, Ewart B, Zeleznikow J (2006a) Decision support systems for police: lessons from the application of data mining techniques to “soft” forensic evidence. Artif Intel Law 14(1–2):35–100
Oatley G, McGarry K, Ewart B (2006b) Offender network metrics. WSEAS Trans Inform Sci and Appl 12(3):2440–2448
Oatley G, Crick T, Howell R (2015) Data exploration with GIS viewsheds and social network analysis. In: Proceedings of 23rd GIS Research UK Conference (GISRUK 2015)
Orman G, Labatut V, Cherifi H (2011a) On accuracy of community structure discovery algorithms. J Converg Inform Technol 6(11)
Orman G, Labatut V, Cherifi H (2011b) Qualitative Comparison of Community Detection Algorithms. Digital Information and Communication Technology and Its Applications. Springer, Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp 265–279
Papachristos AV (2006) Studying Youth Gangs, chap Social Network Analysis and Gang Research: Theory and Methods, AltaMira Press
Papachristos AV (2009) Murder by structure: dominance relations and the social structure of Gang Homicide. Am J Sociol 115(1):74–128
Patacchini E, Zenou Y (2008) The strength of weak ties in crime. Eur Econ Rev 52(2):209–236
Pitts J (2007) Reluctant Gangsters: Youth Gangs in Waltham Forest. University of Bedfordshire, Tech. rep
Pitts J (2008) Reluctant Gangsters: the changing face of youth crime. Willan
Procter R, Crump J, Karstedt S, Voss A, Cantijoch M (2013) Reading the riots: what were the police doing on Twitter? Polic Soc 23(4):413–436
Rombach M, Porter MA, Fowler JH, Mucha PJ (2014) Core-Periphery structure in networks. SIAM J Appl Math 74(1):167–190
Rosvall M, Axelsson D, Bergstrom CT (2010) The map equation. Eur Phys J Spec Topics 178(1):13–23
Walsh P (2005) Gang War: the inside story of the Manchester Gangs. Milo Books
Watts DJ (2003) Small Worlds: the dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton University Press
Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442
Webb VJ, Ren L, Zhao J, He N, Marshall IH (2011) A comparative study of youth gangs in china and the United States: definition, offending, and victimization. Int Crim Just Rev 21(3):225–242
Wright JD (2005) The constitutional failure of gang databases. Stanford J Civil Rights Civil Liberties
Xu J, Chen H (2005) Criminal network analysis and visualization. Commun ACM 48(6):100–107
Yan B, Gregory S (2012) Detecting community structure in networks using edge prediction methods. J Stat Mech 2012(P09008):
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the UK’s Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Sandpit on Gun Crime (September 2005, Warwickshire, UK), funded by the IDEAS Factory; and the assistance of Xcalibre, the Greater Manchester Police’s specialist gang crime task force.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oatley, G., Crick, T. Measuring UK crime gangs: a social network problem. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 5, 33 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-015-0265-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-015-0265-1