Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Serum matrilysin correlates with poor survival independently of KRAS and BRAF status in refractory advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with irinotecan plus cetuximab

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to prospectively explore the role of serum MMP-7 as a predictive and prognostic marker of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy and irinotecan efficacy in third-line advanced colorectal cancer therapy. One hundred patients were recruited prospectively from six Spanish hospitals. Patients were treated with biweekly irinotecan 180 mg/m2 and cetuximab 400 mg/m2 (loading dose) and weekly cetuximab 250 mg/m2 until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Baseline MMP-7 was determined using a quantitative solid-phase sandwich ELISA. KRAS and BRAF mutational status were also assessed. The clinical endpoints examined were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response rate. No association between serum MMP-7 and neither KRAS nor BRAF mutational status was found. The multivariate analysis revealed that MMP-7 predicts PFS both in wild-type (WT) KRAS patients (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00–1.06; p = 0.046) and in mutant KRAS patients (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01–1.35; p = 0.036). The presence of mutant BRAF was associated with shorter PFS (HR 8.49, 95% CI 2.88–25.0; p < 0.001) and worse OS (HR 3.55, 95% CI 1.39–9.09; p = 0.008) in the subset of WT KRAS patients. Serum MMP-7 is associated with PFS in colorectal patients treated with anti-EGFR therapy as third-line treatment independently of KRAS status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, et al. Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2938–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, et al. Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan study group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:905–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, et al. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:337–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sobrero AF, Maurel J, Fehrenbacher L, et al. EPIC: phase III trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2311–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, et al. Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1658–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M, et al. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1626–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, et al. K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1757–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Benvenuti S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Di Nicolantonio F, et al. Oncogenic activation of the RAS/RAF signaling pathway impairs the response of metastatic colorectal cancers to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapies. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2643–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Roock W, Piessevaux H, De Schutter J, et al. KRAS wild-type state predicts survival and is associated to early radiological response in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:508–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Di Fiore F, Blanchard F, Charbonnier F, et al. Clinical relevance of KRAS mutation detection in metastatic colorectal cancer treated by Cetuximab plus chemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2007;96:1166–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Khambata-Ford S, Garrett CR, Meropol NJ, et al. Expression of epiregulin and amphiregulin and K-ras mutation status predict disease control in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3230–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lievre A, Bachet JB, Le Corre D, et al. KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3992–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lievre A, Bachet JB, Boige V, et al. KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:374–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Di NF, Martini M, Molinari F, et al. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5705–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rajagopalan H, Bardelli A, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE. Tumorigenesis: RAF/RAS oncogenes and mismatch-repair status. Nature. 2002;418:934.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jimeno A, Messersmith WA, Hirsch FR, Franklin WA, Eckhardt SG. KRAS mutations and sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in colorectal cancer: practical application of patient selection. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1130–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wong R, Cunningham D. Using predictive biomarkers to select patients with advanced colorectal cancer for treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5668–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ii M, Yamamoto H, Adachi Y, Maruyama Y, Shinomura Y. Role of matrix metalloproteinase-7 (matrilysin) in human cancer invasion, apoptosis, growth, and angiogenesis. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2006;231:20–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Honda M, Mori M, Ueo H, Sugimachi K, Akiyoshi T. Matrix metalloproteinase-7 expression in gastric carcinoma. Gut. 1996;39:444–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamashita K, Mori M, Shiraishi T, Shibuta K, Sugimachi K. Clinical significance of matrix metalloproteinase-7 expression in esophageal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:1169–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones LE, Humphreys MJ, Campbell F, Neoptolemos JP, Boyd MT. Comprehensive analysis of matrix metalloproteinase and tissue inhibitor expression in pancreatic cancer: increased expression of matrix metalloproteinase-7 predicts poor survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:2832–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zeng ZS, Shu WP, Cohen AM, Guillem JG. Matrix metalloproteinase-7 expression in colorectal cancer liver metastases: evidence for involvement of MMP-7 activation in human cancer metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:144–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Adachi Y, Yamamoto H, Itoh F, Hinoda Y, Okada Y, Imai K. Contribution of matrilysin (MMP-7) to the metastatic pathway of human colorectal cancers. Gut. 1999;45:252–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kioi M, Yamamoto K, Higashi S, Koshikawa N, Fujita K, Miyazaki K. Matrilysin (MMP-7) induces homotypic adhesion of human colon cancer cells and enhances their metastatic potential in nude mouse model. Oncogene. 2003;22:8662–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maurel J, Nadal C, Garcia-Albeniz X, et al. Serum matrix metalloproteinase 7 levels identifies poor prognosis advanced colorectal cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:1066–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Martinez-Fernandez A, Garcia-Albeniz X, Pineda E, et al. Serum matrilysin levels predict outcome in curatively resected colorectal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1412–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Cutsem E, Lang I, Folprecht G, Nowacki MP, Cascinu S, Shchepotin I, Maurel J, Cunningham D, Celik I, Köhne Ch. Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer—the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL trial. 2010 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, Orlando.

  30. Burke B, Giannoudis A, Corke KP, et al. Hypoxia-induced gene expression in human macrophages: implications for ischemic tissues and hypoxia-regulated gene therapy. Am J Pathol. 2003;163:1233–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sabha N, Aitken K, Lorenzo AJ, Szybowska M, Jairath A, Bagli DJ. Matrix metalloproteinase-7 and epidermal growth factor receptor mediate hypoxia-induced extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and subsequent proliferation in bladder smooth muscle cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2006;42:124–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ito TK, Ishii G, Chiba H, Ochiai A. The VEGF angiogenic switch of fibroblasts is regulated by MMP-7 from cancer cells. Oncogene. 2007;26:7194–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ito TK, Ishii G, Saito S, et al. Degradation of soluble VEGF receptor-1 by MMP-7 allows VEGF access to endothelial cells. Blood. 2008;113:2123–4.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Azuma M, Shi M, Danenberg KD, et al. Serum lactate dehydrogenase levels and glycolysis significantly correlate with tumor VEGFA and VEGFR expression in metastatic CRC patients. Pharmacogenomics. 2007;8:1705–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Maurel.

Additional information

CIBERehd is funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garcia-Albeniz, X., Pericay, C., Alonso-Espinaco, V. et al. Serum matrilysin correlates with poor survival independently of KRAS and BRAF status in refractory advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with irinotecan plus cetuximab. Tumor Biol. 32, 417–424 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-010-0136-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-010-0136-3

Keywords

Navigation