Abstract
Spreading rate is a primary factor of mantle melting and tectonic behavior of the global mid-ocean ridges. The spreading rate of the Gakkel ridge decreases gradually from west to east. However, the Gakkel ridge can be divided into four thick-and-thin zones with varying crustal thicknesses along ridge axis. This phenomenon indicates that mantle melting of the Gakkel ridge is not a simple function of spreading rate. Mantle temperature, water content, mantle composition, and other factors are important in crustal accretion processes. Based on gravity-derived crustal thickness and wet melting model, we estimate that the mantle potential temperatures of the four zones are 1 270, 1 220, 1 280, and 1 280°C (assuming that mantle water content equals to global average value), with corresponding mantle water contents of 210, 0, 340, and 280 mg/kg (assuming that mantle potential temperature is 1 260°C), respectivly. The western thinned crust zone is best modeled with low mantle temperature, whereas the other zones are mainly controlled by the enhanced conduction caused by the slower spreading rate. Along the Gakkel ridge, the crustal thickness is consistent with rock samples types. Predominated serpentinized peridotite and basalt are found in the area with crustal thickness 〈1.5 km and 〉2.5 km, respectively. The rock samples are including from basalt to peridotite in the area with crustal thickness between 1.5 and 2.5 km. Based on this consistency, the traditional magmatic accretion zone accounted for only 44% and amagmatic accretion accounted for 29% of the Gakkel ridge. The amagmatic accretion is a significant characteristic of the ultra-slow spreading ridge.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asimow P D, Langmuir C H. 2003. The importance of water to oceanic mantle melting regimes. Nature, 421: 815–820
Behn M D, Boettcher M S, Hirth G. 2007. Thermal structure of oceanic transform faults. Geology, 35(4): 307–310
Cannat M, Sauter D, Bezos A, et al. 2008. Spreading rate, spreading obliquity, and melt supply at the ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge. Geochem Geophys Geosyst, 9(4): 144, doi: 10.1029/2007GC001676
Cannat M, Sauter D, Mendel V, et al. 2006. Modes of seafloor generation at a melt-poor ultraslow-spreading ridge. Geology, 34(7): 605–608
Chen Y J. 1996. Constraints on melt production rate beneath the midocean ridges based on passive flow models. Pure Appl Geophys, 146(34): 589–620
Coakley B J, Cochran J R. 1998. Gravity evidence of very thin crust at the Gakkel Ridge (Arctic Ocean). Earth Planet Sci Lett, 162(1–4): 81–95
Davies J H, Bickle M. 1991. A physical model for the volume and composition of melt produced by hydrous fluxing above subduction zones. Phil Trans: R Soc London, 335(1638): 355–364
DeMets C, Gordon R G, Argus D F, et al. 1990. Current plate motions. Geophys J Int, 101(2): 425–478
Dick H J B, Lin Jian, Schouten H. 2003. An ultraslow-spreading class of ocean ridge. Nature, 426(6965): 405–412
Divins D L. 2003. Total Sediment Thickness of the World’s Oceans and Marginal Seas. Boulder, CO: NOAA National Geophysical Data Center
Edwards M H, Kurras G J, Tolstoy M, et al. 2001. Evidence of recent volcanic activity on the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel ridge. Nature, 409: 808–812
Georgen J E, Lin Jian, Dick H J B. 2001. Evidence from gravity anomalies for interactions of the Marion and Bouvet hotspots with the Southwest Indian Ridge: effects of transform offsets. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 187(3–4): 283–300
Jakobsson M, Mayer L, Coakley B, et al. 2012. The international bathymetric chart of the Arctic Ocean (IBCAO) version 3.0. Geophys Res Lett, 39(12): L12609, doi: 10.1029/2012GL052219
Jokat W, Ritzmann O, Schmidt-Aursch M C, et al. 2003. Geophysical evidence for reduced melt production on the Arctic ultraslow Gakkel mid-ocean ridge. Nature, 423(6943): 962–965
Jokat W, Schmidt-Aursch M C. 2007. Geophysical characteristics of the ultraslow spreading Gakkel Ridge, Arctic Ocean. Geophys J Int, 168(3): 983–998
Kenyon S, Forsberg R, Coakley B. 2008. New gravity field for the Arctic. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 89(32): 289–290
Langmuir C H, Forsyth D W. 2007. Mantle melting beneath midocean ridges. Oceanography, 20(1): 78–89
Langmuir C H, Klein E M, Plank T. 1992. Petrological systematics of mid-ocean ridge basalts: Constraints on melt generation beneath ocean ridges. In: Morgan J P, Blackman D K, Sinton J M, eds. Mantle Flow and Melt Generation at Mid-Ocean Ridges. Geophys Monogr Ser, 71: 361
McKenzie D P, Bickle M J. 1988. The volume and composition of melt generated by extension of the lithosphere. J Petrol, 29: 625–679
Michael P J, Langmuir C H, Dick H, et al. 2003. Magmatic and amagmatic seafloor generation at the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel ridge, Arctic Ocean. Nature, 423: 956–961
Muller M R, Minshull T A, White R S. 2000. Crustal structure of the Southwest Indian Ridge at the Atlantis II fracture zone. J Geophys Res, 105(B11): 25809–25828
Müller R D, Sdrolias M, Gaina C, et al. 2008. Age, spreading rates, and spreading asymmetry of the world’s ocean crust. Geochem Geophys Geosyst, 9(4): Q04006, doi: 10.1029/2007GC001743
Oldenburg D W. 1974. The inversion and interpretation of gravity anomalies. Geophysics, 39(4): 526–536
Reid I, Jackson H R. 1981. Oceanic spreading rate and crustal thickness. Mar Geophys Res, 5(2): 165–172
Robinson C J, Bickle M J, Minshull T A, et al. 2001. Low degree melting under the Southwest Indian Ridge: the roles of mantle temperature, conductive cooling and wet melting. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 188(3–4): 383–398
Taylor P T, Kovacs L C, Vogt P R, et al. 1981. Detailed aeromagnetic investigation of the Arctic Basin: 2. J Geophys Res, 86(B7): 6323–6333
Wessel P, Smith W H F. 1995. New version of the Generic Mapping Tools released. EOS Trans AGU, 76: 329
White R S, McKenzie D, O’Nions R K. 1992. Oceanic crustal thickness from seismic measurements and rare earth element inversions. J Geophys Res, 97(B13): 19683–19715
Zhang Tao, Lin Jian, Gao Jinyao. 2013. Magmatism and tectonic processes in Area a hydrothermal vent on the Southwest Indian Ridge. Sci China: Earth Sci, 56(12): 2186–2197, doi: 10.1007/s11430-013-4630-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: Chinese Polar Environment Comprehensive Investigation and Assessment Programmes under contract Nos CHINARE 2013-03-03 and 2013-04-03; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 41106049.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, T., Gao, J., Chen, M. et al. Mantle melting factors and amagmatic crustal accretion of the Gakkel ridge, Arctic Ocean. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 34, 42–48 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-015-0686-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-015-0686-8