Skip to main content
Log in

Karst groundwater quantity assessment and sustainability: the approach appropriate for river basin management plans

  • Thematic Issue
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a result of the fact that karstified rocks can accumulate large amounts of high-quality groundwater, karst aquifer is considered, throughout the world, one of the most important types of aquifers. Due to their high permeability, but also vulnerability to pollution, these precious groundwater resources need to be properly evaluated and protected. Taking into account heterogeneity and complexity of the karst environment, it is difficult to propose a uniform algorithm for managing karst groundwater, which causes the necessity to most often apply a case-by-case approach. The rules and standards of the EU Water Framework Directive require the development of Management Plans for all, and entire, river basins. Such plans include the estimation of pressures on water quality and quantity and have already been prepared for most basins of the European Union countries. This paper discusses the applied methodology and some of the results that have been obtained through the analyses of quantitative pressure on delineated groundwater bodies within the Danube and Sava River basins in Bosnia & Herzegovina and Serbia. The analyses confirmed the immense potential of karst aquifers in both countries as regards groundwater quantity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Stevanović (2015a, b), modified

Fig. 2

Herak (1972), modified

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

According to ASRB (2016); PIVS (2016); GBD (2016), modified

Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agency for Sava River Basin (ASRB) (2016) Sava River Basin Management Plan in Federation of B&H, draft version, Sarajevo. https://www.voda.ba

  • Alley WM (2007) Another water budget myth: the significance of recoverable ground water in storage. Ground Water 45(3):251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakalowicz M (2010) Management of karst groundwater resources. In: van Beynen Philip E (ed) Karst management. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 263–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacci O (2012) 2012: Increase of mean annual surface air temperature in the western Balkans during last 30 years. Vodoprivreda 44(255–257):75–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacci O (2015) Surface waters and groundwater in karst. In: Stevanović Z (ed) Characterization and engineering of karst aquifers. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 149–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacci O, Andrić I (2015) Hydrological analysis of Žrnovnica karst spring near Split (in Croatian). Croat Waters 23(94):311–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredehoeft JD (2002) The water budget myth revisited: why hydrogeologists model. Ground Water 40(4):340–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke JJ, Moench HM (2000) Groundwater and society: resources, tensions and opportunities. Spec ed. of DESA and ISET, UN public. st/esa/265, New York, pp 170

  • Custodio E (1992) Hydrogeological and hydrochemical aspects of aquifer overexploitation. Selec. Pap. of IAH, vol 3. Verlag Heinz Heise, pp 3–27

  • Devlin JF, Sophocleous M (2005) The persistence of the water budget myth and its relationship to sustainability. Hydrogeol J 13:549–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC Report (2012) EC Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC), Brussels

  • Goldscheider N (2015) Overview of methods applied in karst hydrogeology. In: Stevanović Z (ed) Karst aquifers characterization and engineering. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 127–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Brčko Distrikt (2016) Sava river basin management plan in Brčko Distrikt, draft version, Brčko. https://www.bdcentral.net

  • Herak M (1972) Karst of Yugoslavia. In: Herak M, Stringfield VT (eds) Karst: important karst regions of the northern hemisphere. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, pp 25–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Herak M, Magdalenić A, Bahun S (1981) Karst hydrogeology. In: Halasi Kun GJ (ed) Pollution and water resources. Columbia University seminar series, part 1, Hydrogeology and other selected reports, vol XIV. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 163–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Krešić N (2010) Sustainability and management of springs. In: Krešić N, Stevanović Z (eds) Groundwater hydrology of springs—engineering, theory, management and sustainability. Butterwoth-Heinemann, Burlington, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Krešić N (2013) Water in karst—management, vulnerability and restoration. McGraw Hill, New York, p 708

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinzer OE (1920) Quantitative methods of estimating groundwater supplies. Bull Geol Soc Am 31:329–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poehls DJ, Smith GJ (2009) Encyclopedic dictionary of hydrogeology. Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Institute “Vode Srpske” (“Water of Srpska”) (2016) Sava river basin management plan in the Republic of Srpska, draft version, Bijeljina. https://www.voders.org

  • Roje-Bonacci T, Bonacci O (2013) The possible negative consequences of underground dam and reservoir construction and operation in coastal karst areas: an example of the hydro-electric power plant (HEPP) Ombla near Dubrovnik (Croatia). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:2041–2052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevanović Z (1991) Hydrogeology of Carpathian-Balkan karst of eastern Serbia and water supply opportunities, (in Serbian). Faculty of Mining and Geology (spec. ed.), Belgrade, p 245

  • Stevanović Z (2010) Utilization and regulation of springs. In: Krešić N, Stevanović Z (eds) Groundwater hydrology of springs—engineering, theory, management and sustainability. Butterwoth-Heinemann, Burlington, pp 339–387

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stevanović Z (2011) Management of groundwater resources (in Serbian). University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mining & Geology, Belgrade, p 340

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevanović Z (2015a) Characterization of karst aquifers. In: Stevanović Z (ed) Characterization and engineering of karst aquifers. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 47–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevanović Z (2015b) Budget and general assessment of karst groundwater resources. In: Stevanović Z (ed) Characterization and engineering of karst aquifers. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 171–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevanović Z (2018) Global distribution and use of water from karst aquifers. In: Parise M, Gabrovsek F, Kaufmann G, Ravbar N (eds) Advances in karst research: theory, fieldwork and applications, vol 466. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, pp 217–236

  • Stevanović Z, Marinović V (2016) The role and importance of hydrogeology in the creation of river basin management plans at a regional scale. In: Conference proceedings and book of abstracts / IWA specialist groundwater conference, Jaroslav Černi Institute for the Development of Water Resources, pp 180–186

  • Stevanović Z, Kukurić N, Pekaš Ž, Jolović B, Pambuku A, Radojević D (2016) Dinaric karst aquifer—one of the world’s largest transboundary systems and an ideal location for applying innovative and integrated water management. In: Stevanović Z, Kresic N, Kukuric N (eds) Karst without boundaries. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 3–25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • WFD (2005) Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC) groundwater summary report. Directorate General Environment of the European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • WFD CIS Guidance Document No. 15 (2007) Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC) guidance on groundwater monitoring. Directorate General Environment of the European Commission, Brussels

  • WFD CIS Guidance Document No. 18 (2009) Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC) guidance on groundwater status and trend assessment. Directorate General Environment of the European Commission, Brussels

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veljko Marinović.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is a part of a Topical Collection in Environmental Earth Sciences on Sustainable Management of Karst Natural Resources, guest edited by Drs. Sasa Malinovic and Zoran Stevanovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marinović, V., Stevanović, Z. Karst groundwater quantity assessment and sustainability: the approach appropriate for river basin management plans. Environ Earth Sci 78, 362 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8364-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8364-3

Keywords

Navigation