Skip to main content
Log in

A laboratory experience on the effect of grains concentration and coarse sediment on the rheology of natural debris-flows

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Not only solid volumetric concentration, but also coarse particle content play a relevant role on the rheology of soil mixtures involved in mud, debris, hyper-concentrated and earth flows. This paper is devoted to investigating the influence of bulk solid volume concentration and of coarse fraction on the rheological behavior of granular slurries. Laboratory activity is carried out involving different soils from the source area of real debris flows (from the Campania region in Italy). Experimental results demonstrate that the flowing behavior is the same as yield stress fluids with a static yield stress value larger than the dynamic one. A generalized Herschel–Bulkley model is considered, accounting for a consistent index which is a function of solid volume concentration. Experimental evidence demonstrates that the viscous characteristics (i.e., yield stresses and bulk viscosity) are very sensitive to coarse grain content, and the flow characteristics are deeply affected by small variations of both solid content and particle size. In effect, the tested materials show increasing yield stress (both static and dynamic) with solid concentration and decreasing yield stress for an increment of coarser solid fraction. To the contrary, assuming a constant fine grain relative content, the higher the coarse grain fraction is, the lower the yield stress results. Moreover, the typical transition from solid-like to fluid-like behavior, and vice versa, is strongly influenced by solid concentration and grain size distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ancey C (2003) Role of particle network in concentrated mud suspensions. In: Rickenmann D, Chen C (eds) Debris-flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. Millpress Science Publishers, Rotterdam, pp 257–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancey C, Jorrot H (2001) Yield stress for particle suspension within a clay dispersion. J Rheol 45:297–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banfill PFG (1994) Rheological methods for assessing the flow properties of mortar and related materials. Constr Build Mater 8:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contreras SM, Davies TRH (2000) Coarse-grained debris-flows, hysteresis and time-dependent rheology. J Hydraul Eng 126:938–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coussot P (1997) Mudflow rheology and dynamics. IAHR monograph serie. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Coussot P (2005) Rheometry of pastes, suspensions and granular materials: application in industry and environment. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coussot P, Piau JM (1995) A large-scaled field concentric cylinder rheometer for the study of the rheology of natural coarse suspensions. J Rheol 39:105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coussot P, Laigle D, Arratano M, Deganutti A, Marchi L (1998) Direct determination of rheological characteristics of debris flow. J Hydraul Eng 124:865–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslides types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation transportation research board special report 247. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 36–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, Leroueil S, Picarelli L (2014) The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update. Landslides 11:167–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major JJ, Pierson TC (1992) Flow rheology: experimental analysis of fine-grained slurries. Water Resour Res 28(3):841–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malet JP, Remaître A, Maquaire O, Ancey C, Locat J (2003) Flow susceptibility of heterogeneous marly formations: implications for torrent hazard control in the Barcelonnette Basin (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France). In: Rickenmann D, Chen C (eds) Debris-flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. Millpress Science Publishers, Rotterdam, pp 351–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansoutre S, Colombet P, Van Damme H (1999) Water retention and granular rheological behaviour of fresh C3S paste as a function of concentration. Cem Concr Res 29:1441–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen QD, Boger DV (1985) Direct yield stress measurement with the vane method. J Rheol 29:335–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien JS, Julien PY (1988) Laboratory analysis of mudflow properties. J Hydraul Eng 114:877–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ovarlez G, Rodts S, Chateau X, Coussot P (2009) Phenomenology and physical origin of shear localization of the shear banding in complex fluids. Rheol Acta 4:831–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino AM (2011) Studio teorico sperimentale del comportamento reologico dei terreni coinvolti nelle colate rapide. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Naples Federico II (Italy) (in italian)

  • Pellegrino AM, Schippa L (2013a) Macro viscous regime of natural dense granular mixtures. Int J Geomater 4:482–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino AM, Schippa L (2013b) Experimental analysis for fine-grained and large-grained soils involved in debris flow at the solid-fluid transition. In: Fukuoka S, Nakagawa H, Sumi T, Zang H (eds) Advances in river sediment research, vol 39. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino AM, Scotto di Santolo A, Schippa L (2015a) An integrated procedure to evaluate rheological parameters to model debris flows. Eng Geol 196:88–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino AM, Scotto di Santolo A, Evangelista A (2015b) A new rheometer for mud and debris flow. In Rotonda T, Cecconi M, Silvestri F, Tommasi P (eds). Volcanic rocks and soils. CRC Press Taylor & Francis group, London, pp 265–272

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Picarelli L, Evangelista A, Rolandi G, Paone A, Nicotera MV. Olivares L, Scotto di Santolo A, Lampitiello S, Rolandi M (2007) Mechanical properties of pyroclastic soils in Campania Region. In: Tan TS, Phoon KK, Hight DW, Leroueil S (eds) Characterization and engineering properties of natural soils. CRC Press Taylor & Francis group, London, pp 2331–2338

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzmann M, Fischer P, Bezzolla GR (2003) Rheological behavior of fine and large particle suspensions. J Hydraul Eng 129:10:796–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzmann M, Bezzola GR, Minor HE, Windhab EJ, Fischer P (2009) Rheometry for large particulated fluids: analysis of the ball measuring system and comparison to debris flow rheometry. Rheol Acta 48:715–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schippa L, Pavan S (2011) Numerical modelling of catastrophic events produced by mud or debris flows. Int J Saf Secur Eng 1:403–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scotto di Santolo A, Pellegrino AM, Evangelista A, Coussot P (2012) Rheological behaviour of reconstituted pyroclastic debris flow. Geotechnique 62:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scotto di Santolo A (2000) Analisi geotecnica dei fenomeni franosi nelle coltri piroclastiche della Provincia di Napoli. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Naples Federico II (Italy) (in italian)

  • Scotto di Santolo A, Pellegrino AM, Evangelista A (2009) Experimental study on the rheological behaviour of debris flow material in the Campania region. In: Mammoli A, Brebbia CA (eds) Computational methods in multiphase flow V, WIT transactions on engineering sciences, vol 63, pp 305–316

  • Scotto di Santolo A, Pellegrino AM, Evangelista A (2010) Experimental study on the rheological behaviour of debris flow. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:2507–2514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengun MZ, Probstein RF (1989a) Bimodal model of slurry viscosity with applications to coal slurries. Part 1. Theory and experiment. Rheol Acta 28:382–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengun MZ, Probstein RF (1989b) Bimodal model of slurry viscosity with applications to coal slurries. Part 2. High shear limit behaviour. Rheol Acta 28:394–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosio R, Crosta GB (2009) Rheology of concentrated granular suspensions and possible implications for debris flow modeling. Water Resour Res 45(Wo3412):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T (1991) Debris flows. IAHR monograph series. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildemuth CR, Williams MC (1985) A new interpretation of viscosity and yield stress in dense slurries: coal and other irregular particles. Rheol Acta 24:75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo Schippa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pellegrino, A.M., Schippa, L. A laboratory experience on the effect of grains concentration and coarse sediment on the rheology of natural debris-flows. Environ Earth Sci 77, 749 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7934-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7934-0

Keywords

Navigation