Skip to main content
Log in

Analytical Variation Between Two Different TSH Reagents from the Same Manufacturer

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) immunoassays are known for giving varying results based on the platform of testing and the generation of kit used. It is generally expected that the results should not vary to affect clinical diagnosis and management. We aimed to perform method comparison study between two TSH assays by the same manufacturer Siemens Healthineers. Results show that there is a large proportional error between the assays with a bias of -3.71mIu/L indicating that TSH assay gives higher values for TSH for the same patient as measured against the TSH3-Ultra kit. This can affect interpretation of results leading to false increase in patients categorized under hypothyroidism and subclinical hypothyroidism. We strongly suggest, to prevent errors in clinical evaluation of a patient with thyroid dysfunction, validation of the performance of the assay and method comparison should be performed in-house.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Miller WG, Myers GL, Gantzer ML, Kahn SE, Schönbrunner ER, Thienpont LM, et al. Roadmap for harmonization of clinical laboratory measurement procedures. Clin Chem. 2011;57:1108–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Faix JD, Thienpont LM, Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone: Why Efforts to Harmonize Testing Are Critical to Patient Care. In Clinical laboratory News. American Association of Clinical Chemistry. 2013. https://www.aacc.org/publications/cln/articles/2013/may/tsh-harmonization#ref. Accessed on 15 Sep 2020.

  3. Thienpont LM, Van Uytfanghe K, De Grande LAC, Reynders D, Das B, Faix JD, et al. Harmonization of serum thyroid-stimulating hormone measurements paves the way for the adoption of a more uniform reference interval. Clin Chem. 2017;63(7):1248–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. NABL 112. Specific Criteria for Accreditation of Medical Laboratories. India. 2019. https://nabl-india.org/nabl/201905031045-NABL-112-effective-from-01.06.2019-doc.pdf. Accessed on 5 Aug 2020.

  5. Stagnaro-Green A, Abalovich M, Alexander E, Azizi F, Mestman J, Negro R, et al. Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and postpartum. Thyroid. 2011;21(10):1081–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barth JH, Luvai A, Jassam N, Mbagaya W, Kilpatrick ES, Narayanan D, et al. Comparison of method-related reference intervals for thyroid hormones: studies from a prospective reference population and a literature review. Ann Clin Biochem. 2018;55(1):107–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudhesna Mohapatra.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohapatra, S., Chakraborty, S. Analytical Variation Between Two Different TSH Reagents from the Same Manufacturer. Ind J Clin Biochem 38, 132–135 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-021-00957-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-021-00957-2

Keywords

Navigation