Skip to main content
Log in

Development of Headform Impactor Finite Element Model Considering the Hyperelastic and Viscoelastic Responses of Rubber

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate and analyze the pedestrian injury risk of automobiles, the finite element models of headform impactors are used. In this study, a modeling method that can accurately estimate the peak of the headform impactor impact pulse and head injury criterion (HIC) was developed. The headform impactor skin has the characteristics of both hyperelasticity and viscoelasticity. Therefore, compression tests, stress relaxation tests, and rheometer tests were conducted, and the hyperelastic and viscoelastic models were developed. The models were combined and used in the finite element analysis. The new headform impactor model was verified to accurately estimate the peak of impact pulse and HIC at the certification test of the headform impactor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM (2012). ASTM D-575 Standard Test Methods for Rubber Properties in Compression.

  • ASTM (2014). ASTM 6147-97 Test Method for Vulcanized Rubber and Thermoplastic Elastomer–Determination of Force Decay (Stress Relaxation) in Compression.

  • Belingardi, G., Chiandussi, G. and Gaviglio, I. (2005). Development and Validation of a New Finite Element Model of Human Head. 19th Int. Technical Conf. Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). Paper Number 05-0441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, A. F. (2009). Applied Mechanics of Solids. CRC Press. Roca Raton, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinson, H. F. and Brinson, L. C. (2015). Polymer Engineering Science and Viscoelasticity. Springer. New York, USA.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., Park, B. and Kim, J. (2012). Development and validation of FE adult headform impactor for pedestrian protection. Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 20, 2, 64–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, R. M. (1971). Theory of Viscoelasticity: An Introduction. Academic Press, New York. New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dassault Systems (2013). ABAQUS 6.13. ABAQUS User’s Manual.

  • Du Bois, P. A., Kolling, S., Koesters, M. and Frank, T. (2006). Material behaviour of polymers under impact loading. Int. J. Impact Engineering 32, 5, 725–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEVC WG 17 (2002). Improved Test Methods to Evaluate Pedestrian Protection Affortded By Passenger Cars. EEVC Working Group 17 Report.

  • Frank, T., Kurz, A., Pitzer, M. and Sollner, M. (2003). Development and validation of numerical pedestrian impactor models. 4th European LS-DYNA Users Conf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist, M. D. (2003). Modelling and accident reconstruction of head impact injuries. Key Engineering Materials, 245-246, 417–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahmoudi, H. (2013). Modeling of Bonnet in LS-DYNA for Pedestrian Research. M. S. Thesis. Chalmers University of Technology. Gothenburg, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huanga, S. and Yanga, J. (2010). Optimization of a reversible hood for protecting a pedestrian’s head during car collisions. Accident Analysisand Prevention 42, 4, 1136–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humanetics (2016). http://www.humaneticsatd.com/crashtest-dummies/pedestrian/pedestrian-headforms

  • Jarlath, M. H. (2007). Ultrasound Technique for the Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) of Polymers. Ph. D. Dissertation. Technische University Berlin. Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamalakkannan, S., Guenther, D., Wiechel, J. and Stammen, J. (2005). MADYMO modeling of the IHRA head-form impactor. SAE Paper No. 2005-01-2740.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li, R. (2000). Time-temperature superposition method for glass transition temperature of plastic materials. Materials Science and Engineering: A 278, 1–2, 36-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LSTC Corporation (2013). LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual, Version 971.

  • Masoumi, A., Shojaeefard, M. H. and Najibi, A. (2011). Comparison of steel, aluminum and composite bonnet in terms of pedestrian head impact. Safety Science 49, 10, 1371–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naci, H., Chisholm, D. and Baker, T. D. (2009). Distribution of Road Traffic Deaths by Road User Group: A Global Comparison. http://www.who.int/choice/ publications/RTI%20Distribution%20Article.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobuhiro, I. (2003). Computational simulation for head impact on vehicle hoods using the precise finite element model. Proc. 18th Int. Technical Conf. Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Nagoya, Japan, 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ommaya, A. K., Thibault, L. and Bandak, F. A. (1994). Mechanisms of impact head injury. Int. J. Impact Engineering 15, 4, 535–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, L., Yong, X. and Qing, Z. (2009). Friction effects in pedestrian headform impacts with engine hoods. Tsinghua Science and Technology 14, 5, 631–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qing, Z., Huiling, D. and Fanzhong, K. (2004). Recent progress in pedestrian impact protection. Proc. China Int. Conf. Automotive Safety Technology, SAE-China, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samaka, H. and Tarlochan, F. (2013). Finite Element (FE) human head models/literature review. Int. J. Scientific & Technology Research 2, 7, 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulzer, J., Kamalakkannan, S. B., Wiechel, J. and Guenther, D. (2006). Simplified MADYMO model of the IHRA head-form impactor. SAE Paper No. 2006-01-2349.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, T. L. and Nguyen, T. H. (2008). Development and validation of FE models of impactor for pedestrian testing. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 22, 9, 1660–1667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Untaroiu, C., Shin, J., Crandal, J. and Crino, S. (2006). Development and validation of headform impactor finite element model with application to vehicle hood design for pedestrian protection. 9th Int. LS-DYNA Users Conf.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe) (2007). Final Report on the Development of a Global Technical Regulation Concerning Pedestrian Protection: Proposal for a Draft Global Technical Regulation on Pedestrian Safety.

  • UNECE (The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe) (2009). Global Technical Regulation No. 9: PEDESTRIAN SAFETY.

  • Wason, W. L. and Smith, O. J. (2000). Injury surveillance in Victoria, Australia: Developing comprehensive injury incidence estimates. Accident Analysis & Prevention 32, 2, 277–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. L., Landel, R. F. and Ferry, J. D. (1995). The temperature dependence of relaxation mechanisms in amorphous polymers and other glass-forming liquids. J. American Chemical Society 77, 14, 3701–3707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, H., Zhu, M., Hu, P. and Lu, S. (2012). FE modeling method for a headform used in pedestrian protection simulations. Int. J. Automotive Technology 13, 4, 607–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyun-Yong Jeong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, CR., Jeong, HY. Development of Headform Impactor Finite Element Model Considering the Hyperelastic and Viscoelastic Responses of Rubber. Int.J Automot. Technol. 19, 523–534 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-018-0050-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-018-0050-z

Key words

Navigation