Skip to main content
Log in

Theoretical Formula of Ultimate Shear Strength for RC Beams without Transverse Reinforcement by Using External Vertical Prestressing Rebars

  • Structural Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

External vertical prestressing rebars (EVPRs) can effectively improve shear strength of concrete structures by the way of providing vertical compressive stress to the concrete and acting as stirrups. The objective of this study is to obtain a shear strength prediction model of EVPRs strengthening concrete beam without transverse reinforcement enhanced by modifying the ACI-318 and Critical Shear Crack Theory (CSCT). At the same time, this article analyzes the contribution of the strength of the shear strength, including the EVPRs as stirrups, compression zone of concrete, dowelling action, aggregate interlock and residual tensile strength. The results indicate that the shear strength prediction model can fit well with the experimental data and EVPRs can effectively enhance shear strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a (mm):

Shear span of the segment without transverse reinforcement

A s (mm2):

Area of longitudinal bars intersects at point A of the critical shear crack

A sv (mm2):

Area of stirrups within spacing sP

A svP (mm2):

Area of the EVPRs within spacing sP

b (mm):

Width of the beam

b ef (mm):

Effective width of concrete in tension

c (mm):

Depth of the compression zone

c 1 c 2 c 3 :

Related parameters in the CSC

c b (mm):

Concrete cover

d (mm):

Effective height of beam cross-section

d b (mm):

Diameter of the longitudinal bar

d F (mm):

Vertical height of the CSC

d g (mm):

Maximum aggregate size

E c (MPa):

Modulus of elasticity of conrete

E s (MPa):

Modulus of elasticity of the longitudinal bar

E svP (MPa):

Modulus of elasticity of the EVPR

f c (MPa):

Concrete compressive strength in cylinder

f ct,ef (MPa):

Effective tensile strength of concrete

F P (N):

Pulling force in the EVPRs

f t (MPa):

Concrete tensile strength in cylinder

f yv (MPa):

Yield strength of stirrups

f y vp (MPa):

Yield strength of the EVPRs

G F (N/mm):

Fracture energy of concrete

h (mm):

Height of beam cross-section

h F (mm):

Vertical distance from the point F of the CSC to the beam top

k b :

Reduction factor tensile strength of concrete

l (mm):

Span length

l 1 l 2 l 3 l F1 (mm):

Integration limits

l B (mm):

Length of segment A-B of the CSC

l ef (mm):

Effective length of concrete in tension

l F (mm):

Length of segment B-F of the CSC

m:

Number of longitudinal bars activated in dowel action

n P :

The arranged number of the EVPRs along the beam width

r F (mm):

Horizontal distance from the point F of the CSC to the loading

s (mm):

The arranged spacing of stirrups along the beam length

s P (mm):

The arranged spacing of the EVPRs along the beam length

u A (mm):

Horizontal opening of the CSC at point A

v A (mm):

Vertical opening of the CSC at point A

V Agg (N):

Shear capacity contribution of aggregate interlock of concrete in the beam without transverse reinforcement

V c(N):

Shear capacity contribution of the concrete in the beam without transverse reinforcement

V C ompr (N):

Shear capacity contribution of compression zone of concrete in the beam without transverse reinforcement

V comprP (N) :

Shear capacity contribution of compression zone of concrete in the beam without transverse reinforcement but enhanced by the EVPRs

V cP (N):

Shear capacity contribution of the concrete in the beam without transverse reinforcement but enhanced by the EVPRs

V Dowel (N):

Shear capacity contribution of dowel action of longitudinal bars in the beam without transverse reinforcement

V DowelP (N):

Shear capacity contribution of dowel action of longitudinal bars in the beam without transverse reinforcement but enhanced by the EVPRs

V Res (N):

Shear capacity contribution of residual tensile strength of concrete in the beam without transverse reinforcement

V ResAB (N):

Shear capacity contribution of residual tensile strength of concrete at the segment A-B of the CSC in the beam without transverse reinforcement

V ResABP (N):

Shear capacity contribution of residual tensile strength of concrete at the segment A-B of the CSC in the beam without transverse reinforcement but enhanced by the EVPRs

V ResBF (N):

Shear capacity contribution of residual tensile strength of concrete at the segment B-F of the CSC in the beam without transverse reinforcement

V ResBFP (N):

Shear capacity contribution of residual tensile strength of concrete at the segment B-F of the CSC in the beam without transverse reinforcement but enhanced by the EVPRs

V ResP (N):

Shear capacity contribution of residual tensile strength of concrete in the beam without transverse reinforcement but enhanced by the EVPRs

V s (N):

Shear capacity of the ordinary stirrups

V sP (N):

Shear capacity contribution of the EVPRs as stirrups

V u (N):

Total shear capacity of the beam without transverse reinforcement

V uP (N):

Total shear capacity of the beam without transverse reinforcement but enhanced by the EVPRs

w C (º):

Maximum opening of concrete allowing to transfer stress in the CSC

x A (mm):

Horizontal distance from the support to point A of the CSC

x F (mm):

Horizontal distance from the support to point F of the CSC

β AB (º):

Angle of the segment A-B of the CSC

β BF (º):

Angle of the segment B-F of the CSC

ρ :

Reinforcement ratio of longitudinal bars

δ A (mm):

Crack sliding of the CSC at point A

ε s :

Strain of the longitudinal bar

σ zP0 (MPa):

Vertical compression stress in the concrete provided by the initial pulling force of the EVPRs

σ zP1 (MPa):

Vertical compression stress in the concrete provided by the EVPRs during the loading process of the beam

σ zPy (MPa):

Vertical compression stress in the concrete provided by the EVPRs when the EVPRs at yielding strength

ψ (º):

Rotating angle of the CSC

ω A (º):

Opening at point A of the CSC

k c :

Coefficient compression zone

ω B(º):

Opening at point B of the CSC

References

  • Aboutaha R, Burns N (1991) Shear strengthening of pretensioned prestressed concrete composite flexural members. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Aboutaha RS, Burns NH (1994) Strengthening of prestressed concrete composite beams using external prestressed stirrups. PCI Journal 39(4):64–74, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07011994.64.74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ACI 318-19 (2019) Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-19, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • ACI-DAfStb (2013) Database of shear tests on slender reinforced concrete beams without stirrups. ACI Structural Journal 110(5):867–875

    Google Scholar 

  • Adhikary BB, Mutsuyoshi H (2006) Shear strengthening of reinforced concrete beams using various techniques. Construction and Building Materials 20(6):366–373, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altin S, Tankut T, Anil Ö, Demirel Y (2003) Response of reinforced concrete beams with clamps applied externally: An experimental study. Engineering Structures 25(9):1217–1229, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00082-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aurelio M, Joseph S (1991) Behavior of beams and punching in slabs without shear reinforcement. Proceedings of the IABSE Colloquium, Stuttgart, Germany

  • Aurelio M, Miguel FR (2008) Shear strength of members without transverse reinforcement as function of critical shear crack width. ACI Structural Journal 105(2):163–72, DOI: https://doi.org/10.14359/19731

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolger P (2006) Strengthening of headstocks with vertical clamping to enhance shear capacity. University of Southern Queensland, Queensland, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Campana S, Anastasi A, Ruiz MFN (2012) Analysis of shear-transfer actions on one-way RC members based on measured cracking pattern and failure kinematics. ACI Structural Journal 65(6):386–404, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.12.00142

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalioris CE, Thermou GE, Pantazopoulou SJ (2014) Behaviour of rehabilitated RC beams with self-compacting concrete jacketing — Analytical model and test results. Construction & Building Materials 55(55):257–273, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir A, Ercan E, Demir DD (2018) Strengthening of reinforced concrete beams using external steel members. Steel and Composite Structures 27(4):453–464, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.4.453

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinh HH, Parra-Montesinos GJ, Wight JK (2009) Shear behavior of steel fiber reinforced concrete beams without stirrup reinforcement. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, DOI: https://doi.org/10.14359/51663913

    Google Scholar 

  • Enrique M, Antonio A (1990) Temperature and stress distributions in concrete box girder bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering 116(9):2388–409, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:9(2388)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira D, Bairán JM, Marí A (2016) Shear strengthening of reinforced concrete beams by means of vertical prestressed reinforcement. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 12(3):394–410, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1019893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francesco C, Miguel FR, Aurelio M (2015) Shear failures in reinforced concrete members without transverse reinforcement: An analysis of the critical shear crack development on the basis of test results. Engineering Structures 103(15):157–73, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.015

    Google Scholar 

  • Francesco C, Miguel FR, Aurelio M (2017) An analysis of the shear-transfer actions in reinforced concrete members without transverse reinforcement based on refined experimental measurements. Structural Concrete 19(1):49–64, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201700145

    Google Scholar 

  • Francesco C, Miguel FR, Aurelio M (2018) A mechanical model for failures in shear of members without transverse reinforcement based on development of a critical shear crack. Engineering Structures 157(1): 300–315, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu F, Josee B, Denis M (2019) Shear strengthening of concrete members with unbonded transverse reinforcement. Engineering Structures 180:40–49, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel FR, Sylvain P, Muttoni A (2010) Interaction between bond and deviation forces in spalling failures of arch-shaped members without transverse reinforcement. ACI Structural Journal 107(3):346–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon D, Sim J, Oh H (2005) Practical crack control during the construction of precast segmental box girder bridges. Computers & Structures 83(31):2584–2593, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt HW (1984) Fracture mechanics of an elastic softening material like concrete. Delft University of Technology 29(2):1–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Rui VR, Olivier B, Aurelio M (2005) Experimental investigation of the shear capacity of plastic hinges. Fib Symposium “Keep Concrete Attractive”, Budapest, Hungary, 651–656

  • Ruiz MF, Mirzaei Y, Muttoni A (2013) Post-punching behavior of flat slabs. ACI Structural Journal 110(5):801–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamsai M, Sezen H, Khaloo A (2007) Behavior of reinforced concrete beams post-tensioned in the critical shear region. Engineering Structures 29(7):1465–1474, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.07.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walraven JC (1981) Fundamental analysis of aggregate interlock. Journal of the Structural Division 107(11):2245–2270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue XX, Wang X, Hua XD, Wu MZ, Wu LQ, Ma Z, Zhou JL (2019) Experimental investigation of the shear behavior of a concrete beam without web reinforcements using externally vertical prestressing rebars. Advances in Civil Engineering 2019(2019):1–13, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3452056

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Fang Z, Chen B (2018) Experimental study on shear behavior of prestressed reactive powder concrete I-girders. Frontiers of Structural & Civil Engineering 13(7):1–10, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-018-0500-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao BJ, Yin HJ, Hao XW, Meng J (2011) Analysis on PC box beam webs by vertical prestress in consideration of stress diffusion. Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering 33(6):79–83, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181f49ac7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Scientific Research Project of Educational Department of Liaoning Province (LNZD202005) and the financial support from the project of the MOE Key Lab of Disaster Forecast and Control in Engineering of Jinan University grant number (20200904005). We would like to thank Editage (https://www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junlong Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xue, X., Wu, M., Zhou, P. et al. Theoretical Formula of Ultimate Shear Strength for RC Beams without Transverse Reinforcement by Using External Vertical Prestressing Rebars. KSCE J Civ Eng 25, 2522–2533 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0911-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0911-2

Keywords

Navigation