Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Algorithmic development of life-cycle assessment: Application of urban water infrastructure systems in Iran

  • Water Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Urban infrastructure has an indisputable role in society’s productivity. Since the residents’ quality of life is dependent on the performance of infrastructure systems, devising procedures for monitoring such systems’ current performance and predicting their future capabilities are necessary. Proper monitoring regime will take into account the remaining efficient performance time of the system and allocate appropriate maintenance and rehabilitation activities, thereby increasing the system productivity. Due to the vital role of water in people’s lives and the immense size and complexity of urban water-distribution systems, the operation of urban water infrastructure is worthy of special attention in this regard. This paper presents an advanced algorithm for life-cycle assessment (LCA) of urban water infrastructure that is capable of determining the optimal time for system rehabilitation, taking into account both the economic and structural aspects of the system performance. The efficiency of the proposed approach is examined through the case study on a real water-distribution system in Iran. The system performance is simulated over its projected performance period via different breakage scenarios, and its efficiency is quantified by using a reliability-based indicator. The costs and benefits associated with the infrastructure performance are then evaluated, and its remaining useful operational life is estimated based on the projected reliability of the system and revenue impacts. The results of the case study imply that the developed method can be used to complement current practices as a proper tool for life cycle assessment of urban water infrastructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abaza, K. A. (2002). “Optimum flexible pavement life-cycle analysis model.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 128, No. 6, pp. 542–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balali, V., Mottaghi, A., Shoghli, O., and Golabchi, M. (2014). “Selection of appropriate material, construction technique, and structural system of bridges by use of multi-criteria decision-making method.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board (TRR)(2431), pp. 78–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balali, V., Zahraie, B., and Roozbahani, A. (2012). “Integration of ELECTRE III and PROMETHEE II Decision-Making Methods with an Interval Approach: Application in Selection of Appropriate Structural Systems.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 297–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balali, V., Zahraie, B., and Roozbahani, A. (2014). “A Comparison of AHP and PROMETHEE family decision making methods for selection of building structural system.” American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBI (2012). “Central Bank of Iran.” <http://www.cbi.ir/default_en.aspx>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S. (1986). “Analysis for strategic marketing decisions.” St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Isola, A. J. and Kirk, S. J. (2003). Life cycle costing for facilities: Economic analysis for owners and professionals in planning, programming, and real estate development: Designing, specifying, and construction, maintenance, operations, and procurement, Robert s Means Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, A. C., Frangopol, D. M., and Lin, K.-Y. (1997). “Minimum expected life cycle cost design for bridges.” Proc., Proceedings of the Seventh IFIP WG75 Working Conference, Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems. Terrytown, NY: Pergamon, pp. 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabrycky, W. J. and Blanchard, B. S. (1991). Life-cycle cost and economic analysis, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, R., Norman, G., and Furbur, J. D. (1989). Life cycle costing for construction, Surveyors Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frangopol, D. M. (1999). Case studies in optimal design and maintenance planning of civil infrastructure systems, ASCE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. and Petersen, S. (1996). “Life-cycle costing manual for the federal energy management program, 1995 Edition.” NIST handbook, 135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, D. and Roy, S. (2009). “Maintenance optimization using probabilistic cost-benefit analysis.” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 403–407.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, A. S. and Hastak, M. (0000). “Infrastructure planning handbook: Planning, engineering, and economics.” ASCE.

  • Goulter, I. C. and Coals, A. (1986). “Quantitative approaches to reliability assessment in pipe networks.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 112, No. 3, pp. 287–301, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1986) 112:3(287).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, G. and Shim, H.-S. (1998). “Integration of bridge management systems and nondestructive evaluations.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herder, P. and Wijnia, Y. (2012). “A systems view on infrastructure asset management.” Asset Management, Springer, pp. 31–46.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi, S. and Macke, M. (2008). “Cost-benefit analysis for the optimal rehabilitation of deteriorating structures.” Structural Safety, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 291–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, T., Han, S., and Lee, S. (2007). “Simulation-based determination of optimal life-cycle cost for FRP bridge deck panels.” Automation in Construction, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 140–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iran, S. C. O. (2012). “Iran Statistical Year Book.” <https://amar.sci. org.ir/index_e.aspx>

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalhor, R. and Case, S. W. (2015). “The effect of FRP thickness on energy absorption of metal-FRP square tubes subjected to axial compressive loading.” Composite Structures, Vol. 130, pp. 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalhor, R., Akbarshahi, H., and Case, S. W. (2013). “Multi-objective optimization of axial crush performance of square metal–composite hybrid tubes.” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, V009T010A035-V009T010A035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, A., Keoleian, G. A., and Helfand, G. E. (2008). “Integrated lifecycle assessment and life-cycle cost analysis model for concrete bridge deck applications.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 214–222. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2008)14:3(214).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, G.-T., Kim, K.-T., Lee, D.-H., Han, C.-H., Kim, H.-B., and Jun, J.-T. (2010). “Development of a life cycle cost estimate system for structures of light rail transit infrastructure.” Automation in Construction, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 308–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, D.-H. and Ariaratnam, S. T. (2008). “Application of a sustainability model for assessing water main replacement options.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 134, No. 8, pp. 563–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansey, K. E., Duan, N., Mays, L. W., and Tung, Y.-K. (1989). “Water distribution system design under uncertainties.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 115, No. 5, pp. 630–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew, M. D. (2014). “A Framework and Breakdown of Health & Usage.” Drexel University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, P. and Chiu, T. (2009). “Towards optimal life cycle management in a road maintenance setting using DEA.” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 196, No. 2, pp. 672–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, M. (2010). “Product life cycle management.” Longer Lasting Products: Alternatives to the Throwaway Society, pp. 351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, Y.-C., Mays, L. W., Duan, N., and Lansey, K. E. (1987). “Reliabilitybased optimization model for water distribution systems.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 113, No. 12, pp. 1539–1556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoft-Christensen, P. and Sørensen, J. (1987). “Optimal strategy for inspection and repair of structural systems.” Civil Engineering Systems, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 94–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugwu, O., Kumaraswamy, M., Kung, F., and Ng, S. (2005). “Objectoriented framework for durability assessment and life cycle costing of highway bridges.” Automation in Construction, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 611–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Noortwijk, J. M. and Frangopol, D. M. (2004). “Two probabilistic life-cycle maintenance models for deteriorating civil infrastructures.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirsching, P. H. and Ortiz, K. (1990). “Optimal economic strategies with considerations of reliability of fatigue-sensitive structural systems.” Structural Safety, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Works, D. o. P. (1981). “LCC Analysis Method for Architecture.” Ministry of Construction, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, C. and Goulter, I. C. (1999). “Reliability-based optimal design of water distribution networks.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 125, No. 6, pp. 352–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zayed, T. M., Chang, L.-M., and Fricker, J. D. (2002). “Life-cycle cost analysis using deterministic and stochastic methods: Conflicting results.” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, T. and Fu, C. C. (2006). “Infrastructure development and expansion under uncertainty: A risk-preference-based lattice approach.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 132, No. 6, pp. 620–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, T., Sundararajan, S. K., and Tseng, C.-L. (2004). “Highway development decision-making under uncertainty: A real options approach.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Civil Engineering and Construction Engineering Management, California State University, Long Beach, CA, 90815, USA

    Vahid Balali

  2. School of Civil Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Kourosh Yaseri

  3. OHL School of Construction, College of Engineering and Computing, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33174, USA

    Youngjib Ham

Authors
  1. Vahid Balali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kourosh Yaseri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Youngjib Ham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youngjib Ham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balali, V., Yaseri, K. & Ham, Y. Algorithmic development of life-cycle assessment: Application of urban water infrastructure systems in Iran. KSCE J Civ Eng 21, 1979–1990 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0994-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0994-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation