Abstract
The aim of this paper is to identify the effect of neighborhood peer groups on firm’s performance, approximated by the value added per worker. More specifically, we distinguish between the effects of own firm’s characteristics (direct effects) and mean characteristics of their neighbors (endogenous and contextual effects) on its output level. Using the Conditional Maximum Likelihood estimator proposed by Lee (J Econom, 140(2):333–374, 2007) on Tunisian data, we show that the average value added per worker of peers affect significantly individual firm’s performance. In addition, contextual peer effects are also significant. The multiplier effect on labor productivity varies between 1.6 and 2.03 according to the reference group definition.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Les cahiers de l’IEQ (Institut d’Économie Quantitative), No 16, Mars 2002.
‘Répertoire National des Entreprises’.
For both maps, we use the Jenks natural breaks classification method, to determine the best arrangement of firms into different classes by minimizing the variance within classes and maximizing the variance between classes.
This assumption ensures that there is sufficient variation in group sizes (see Davezies et al. (2009) for more details).
Sargent and Rodriguez (2000) argued that both labor productivity and total factor productivity (TFP) are useful indicators of growth trends in the economy, but the choice should depend on several factors such as the time period of interest, the quality and comparability of the capital stock data and the growth model assumed. The authors argued that the labor productivity is the suitable measure if the time period of interest is less than a decade.
According to Fischer et al. (2009) “a change in the human capital level in region (observation) \(i\) will not only exert a direct effect on the productivity level of this region, but also an indirect effect on productivity levels in other regions \(i\ne j\)”.
References
Amara, M., Hichri, S.: Le territoire d’implantation: quel rôle pour la croissance des petites entreprises Tunisiennes ? Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine. n\(^{\circ }\), 87–119 (2014) (forthcoming)
Amara, M., Thabet, K.: Structure industrielle et développement local du littoral tunisien, 1998–2004. Mondes en développement, n\(^{\circ }\)157, 119–136 (2012)
Arrow, K.J.: The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Economic Stud. 29(3), 155–173 (1962)
Audretsch, D.B., Feldman, M.P.: R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am. Econ. Rev. 86(3), 630–640 (1996)
Audretsch, D.B., Feldman, M.P.: Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. Handb. Reg. Urban Econ. 4, 2713–2739 (2004)
Baccouche, R., Bouoiyour, J., M’Henni, H., Mouley, S.: Dynamics of investments, changing industry and convertibility capital account: impacts of the measures of liberalization and compared experiences Tunisia-Morocco, Research Project N\(^{\circ }\)FEM 32–04 (2008)
Beaudry, C., Schiffauerova, A.: Who’s right, marshall or jacobs ? the localization versus urbanization debate. Res. Policy 38(2), 318–337 (2009)
Black, S., Lynch, L.: Human capital investments and productivity. Am. Econ. Rev. 86(2), 263–267 (1996)
Boshuizen, J., Geurts, P., Van Der Veen, A.: Regional social networks as conduits for knowledge spillovers: explaining performance of high-tech firms. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 100(2), 183–197 (2009)
Boucher, V., Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., Fortin, B.: Do peers affect student achievement? evidence from Canada using group size variation. J. Appl. Econom. 29(1), 91–109 (2014)
Bouoiyour, J.: Labour productivity, technological gap and spillovers: evidence from Moroccan manufacturing industries. Afr. Financ. J. 7(2), 1–17 (2005)
Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., Fortin, B.: Identification of peer effects through social networks. J. Econom. 150(1), 41–55 (2009)
Ciccone, A., Hall, R.E.: Productivity and the density of economic activity. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research (1996)
Cingano, F., Schivardi, F.: Identifying the sources of local productivity growth. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 2(4), 720–744 (2004)
Coad, A., Teruel, M.: Inter-firm rivalry and firm growth: is there any evidence of direct competition between firms? Ind. Corp. Change 22, 397–425 (2013)
Davezies, L., d’Haultfoeuille, X., Fougère, D.: Identification of peer effects using group size variation. Econom. J. 12(3), 397–413 (2009)
Duranton, G., Puga, D.: Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. Handb. Reg. Urban Econ. 4, 2063–2117 (2004)
Durlauf, S., Young, H.: Social Dynamics (Economic Learning and Social Evolution). MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)
Ellison, G., Glaeser, E.L.: Geographic concentration in us manufacturing industries: a dartboard approach. Technical report (1997)
Fischer, M., Bartkowska, M., Riedl, A., Sardadvar, S., Kunnert, A.: The impact of human capital on regional labor productivity in Europe. Lett. Spat. Resour. Sci. 2(2), 97–108 (2009)
Fortin, B., Yazbeck, M.: Peer Effects, Fast Food Consumption and Adolescent Weight Gain, vol. 2011s-20. CIRANO-Scientific Publications, Montreal (2011)
Girma, S.: Absorptive capacity and productivity spillovers from FDI: a threshold regression analysis. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 67(3), 281–306 (2005)
Glaeser, E.L., Kallal, H.D., Scheinkman, J.A., Shleifer, A.: Growth in cities. J. Polit. Econ. 100(6), 1126–1152 (1992)
Glaeser, E., Sacerdote, B., Scheinkman, J.: Crime and social interactions. Q. J. Econ. 111, 507–548 (1996)
Glaeser, E., Sacerdote, B., Scheinkman, J.: The social multiplier. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 1, 345–353 (2003)
Goaïed, M., Mouelhi, R.B.A.: Efficiency measurement with unbalanced panel data: evidence from Tunisian textile, clothing and leather industries. J. Product. Anal. 13(3), 249–262 (2000)
Guiso, L., Schivardi, F.: Spillovers in industrial districts. Econ. J. 117(516), 68–93 (2007)
Hall, B.H., Mairesse, J.: Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms. J. Econom. 65, 263–293 (1995)
Hanson, G.H.: Scale economies and the geographic concentration of industry. J. Econ. Geogr. 1(3), 255–276 (2001)
Harris, R.: Foreign ownership and productivity in the United Kingdom—some issues when using the ARD establishment level data. Scott. J. Polit. Econ. 49, 318–335 (2001)
Harris, R., Robinson, C.: Foreign ownership and productivity in the United Kingdom-estimates for U.K. manufacturing using the ARD. Rev. Ind. Org. 22, 207–223 (2003)
Harris, R., Moffat, J.: Is productivity higher in british cities? J. Reg. Sci. 52(5), 762–786 (2012)
Henderson, J.V.: Understanding knowledge spillovers. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 37(4), 497–508 (2007)
Henderson, J.V., Kuncoro, A., Turner, M.: Industrial development in cities. J. Polit. Econ. 103(5), 1067–1090 (1995)
Jacobs, J.: The Economy of Cities. Random House, New York (1969)
Kelejian, H.H., Prucha, I.R.: A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. J. Real Estate Finan. Econ. 17(1), 99–121 (1998)
Lee, L.: Identification and estimation of econometric models with group interactions, contextual factors and fixed effects. J. Econom. 140(2), 333–374 (2007)
Levinsohn, J., Petrin, A.: Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev. Econ. Stud. 243, 317–342 (2003)
Li, W., Veliyath, R., Tan, J.: Network characteristics and firm performance: an examination of the relationships in the context of a cluster. J. Small Bus. Manag. 51(1), 1–22 (2013)
Mairesse, J., Sassenou, M.: R&D and productivity: a survey of econometric studies at the firm level. Sci. Technol. Ind. Rev. 8, 317–348 (1991)
Manski, C.: Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Rev. Econ. Stud. 60(3), 531–542 (1993)
Marshall, A.: Principles of Economics. Macmillan and Co., London (1920)
Martin, P., Mayer, T., Mayneris, F.: Spatial concentration and plant-level productivity in France. J. Urban Econ. 69(2), 182–195 (2011)
Mouelhi, R.B.A.: Impact of trade liberalization on firm’s labour demand by skill: the case of Tunisian manufacturing. Labour Econ. 14(3), 539–563 (2007)
Mouelhi, R.B.A.: Impact of the adoption of information and communication technologies on firm efficiency in the Tunisian manufacturing sector. Econ. Model. 26(5), 961–967 (2009)
Neffke, F., Henning, M., Boschma, R., Lundquist, K.-J., Olander, L.-O.: The dynamics of agglomeration externalities along the life cycle of industries. Reg. Stud. 45(1), 49–65 (2011)
Oberhofer, H., Pfaffermayr, M.: Firm growth in multinational corporate groups. Empir. Econ. 44, 1435–1453 (2013)
Olley, S.G., Pakes, A.: The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64, 1263–1297 (1996)
Raspe, O., van Oort, F.: Growth of new firms and spatially bounded knowledge externalities. Ann. Reg. Sci. 46(3), 495–518 (2011)
Rice, P., Venables, A., Patacchini, E.: Spatial determinants of productivity: analysis for the regions of great Britain. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 36(6), 727–752 (2006)
Romer, P.: Endogenous technological change. Technical report (1990)
Sargent, T.C., Rodriguez, E.R.: Labour or total factor productivity: do we need to choose? Int. Product. Monit. 1, 41–44 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amara, M., El Lahga, A. A note on MAR and Jacobs externalities in the Tunisian manufacturing industries. Lett Spat Resour Sci 8, 151–167 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-014-0121-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-014-0121-3