Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A note on MAR and Jacobs externalities in the Tunisian manufacturing industries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to identify the effect of neighborhood peer groups on firm’s performance, approximated by the value added per worker. More specifically, we distinguish between the effects of own firm’s characteristics (direct effects) and mean characteristics of their neighbors (endogenous and contextual effects) on its output level. Using the Conditional Maximum Likelihood estimator proposed by Lee (J Econom, 140(2):333–374, 2007) on Tunisian data, we show that the average value added per worker of peers affect significantly individual firm’s performance. In addition, contextual peer effects are also significant. The multiplier effect on labor productivity varies between 1.6 and 2.03 according to the reference group definition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In reference to contributions of Marshall (1920), Arrow (1962), Romer (1990).

  2. See Lee (2007); Bramoullé et al. (2009) and Boucher et al. (2014) for more details.

  3. Les cahiers de l’IEQ (Institut d’Économie Quantitative), No 16, Mars 2002.

  4. ‘Répertoire National des Entreprises’.

  5. For both maps, we use the Jenks natural breaks classification method, to determine the best arrangement of firms into different classes by minimizing the variance within classes and maximizing the variance between classes.

  6. This assumption ensures that there is sufficient variation in group sizes (see Davezies et al. (2009) for more details).

  7. See Olley and Pakes (1996) and Levinsohn and Petrin (2003) for methodological details on TFP.

  8. Sargent and Rodriguez (2000) argued that both labor productivity and total factor productivity (TFP) are useful indicators of growth trends in the economy, but the choice should depend on several factors such as the time period of interest, the quality and comparability of the capital stock data and the growth model assumed. The authors argued that the labor productivity is the suitable measure if the time period of interest is less than a decade.

  9. According to Fischer et al. (2009) “a change in the human capital level in region (observation) \(i\) will not only exert a direct effect on the productivity level of this region, but also an indirect effect on productivity levels in other regions \(i\ne j\)”.

References

  • Amara, M., Hichri, S.: Le territoire d’implantation: quel rôle pour la croissance des petites entreprises Tunisiennes ? Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine. n\(^{\circ }\), 87–119 (2014) (forthcoming)

  • Amara, M., Thabet, K.: Structure industrielle et développement local du littoral tunisien, 1998–2004. Mondes en développement, n\(^{\circ }\)157, 119–136 (2012)

  • Arrow, K.J.: The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Economic Stud. 29(3), 155–173 (1962)

  • Audretsch, D.B., Feldman, M.P.: R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am. Econ. Rev. 86(3), 630–640 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D.B., Feldman, M.P.: Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. Handb. Reg. Urban Econ. 4, 2713–2739 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baccouche, R., Bouoiyour, J., M’Henni, H., Mouley, S.: Dynamics of investments, changing industry and convertibility capital account: impacts of the measures of liberalization and compared experiences Tunisia-Morocco, Research Project N\(^{\circ }\)FEM 32–04 (2008)

  • Beaudry, C., Schiffauerova, A.: Who’s right, marshall or jacobs ? the localization versus urbanization debate. Res. Policy 38(2), 318–337 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, S., Lynch, L.: Human capital investments and productivity. Am. Econ. Rev. 86(2), 263–267 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boshuizen, J., Geurts, P., Van Der Veen, A.: Regional social networks as conduits for knowledge spillovers: explaining performance of high-tech firms. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 100(2), 183–197 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, V., Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., Fortin, B.: Do peers affect student achievement? evidence from Canada using group size variation. J. Appl. Econom. 29(1), 91–109 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouoiyour, J.: Labour productivity, technological gap and spillovers: evidence from Moroccan manufacturing industries. Afr. Financ. J. 7(2), 1–17 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., Fortin, B.: Identification of peer effects through social networks. J. Econom. 150(1), 41–55 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone, A., Hall, R.E.: Productivity and the density of economic activity. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research (1996)

  • Cingano, F., Schivardi, F.: Identifying the sources of local productivity growth. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 2(4), 720–744 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coad, A., Teruel, M.: Inter-firm rivalry and firm growth: is there any evidence of direct competition between firms? Ind. Corp. Change 22, 397–425 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davezies, L., d’Haultfoeuille, X., Fougère, D.: Identification of peer effects using group size variation. Econom. J. 12(3), 397–413 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duranton, G., Puga, D.: Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. Handb. Reg. Urban Econ. 4, 2063–2117 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S., Young, H.: Social Dynamics (Economic Learning and Social Evolution). MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, G., Glaeser, E.L.: Geographic concentration in us manufacturing industries: a dartboard approach. Technical report (1997)

  • Fischer, M., Bartkowska, M., Riedl, A., Sardadvar, S., Kunnert, A.: The impact of human capital on regional labor productivity in Europe. Lett. Spat. Resour. Sci. 2(2), 97–108 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, B., Yazbeck, M.: Peer Effects, Fast Food Consumption and Adolescent Weight Gain, vol. 2011s-20. CIRANO-Scientific Publications, Montreal (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma, S.: Absorptive capacity and productivity spillovers from FDI: a threshold regression analysis. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 67(3), 281–306 (2005)

  • Glaeser, E.L., Kallal, H.D., Scheinkman, J.A., Shleifer, A.: Growth in cities. J. Polit. Econ. 100(6), 1126–1152 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E., Sacerdote, B., Scheinkman, J.: Crime and social interactions. Q. J. Econ. 111, 507–548 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E., Sacerdote, B., Scheinkman, J.: The social multiplier. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 1, 345–353 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goaïed, M., Mouelhi, R.B.A.: Efficiency measurement with unbalanced panel data: evidence from Tunisian textile, clothing and leather industries. J. Product. Anal. 13(3), 249–262 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Schivardi, F.: Spillovers in industrial districts. Econ. J. 117(516), 68–93 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H., Mairesse, J.: Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms. J. Econom. 65, 263–293 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, G.H.: Scale economies and the geographic concentration of industry. J. Econ. Geogr. 1(3), 255–276 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.: Foreign ownership and productivity in the United Kingdom—some issues when using the ARD establishment level data. Scott. J. Polit. Econ. 49, 318–335 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R., Robinson, C.: Foreign ownership and productivity in the United Kingdom-estimates for U.K. manufacturing using the ARD. Rev. Ind. Org. 22, 207–223 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R., Moffat, J.: Is productivity higher in british cities? J. Reg. Sci. 52(5), 762–786 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J.V.: Understanding knowledge spillovers. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 37(4), 497–508 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J.V., Kuncoro, A., Turner, M.: Industrial development in cities. J. Polit. Econ. 103(5), 1067–1090 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J.: The Economy of Cities. Random House, New York (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelejian, H.H., Prucha, I.R.: A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. J. Real Estate Finan. Econ. 17(1), 99–121 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L.: Identification and estimation of econometric models with group interactions, contextual factors and fixed effects. J. Econom. 140(2), 333–374 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinsohn, J., Petrin, A.: Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev. Econ. Stud. 243, 317–342 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Veliyath, R., Tan, J.: Network characteristics and firm performance: an examination of the relationships in the context of a cluster. J. Small Bus. Manag. 51(1), 1–22 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mairesse, J., Sassenou, M.: R&D and productivity: a survey of econometric studies at the firm level. Sci. Technol. Ind. Rev. 8, 317–348 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C.: Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Rev. Econ. Stud. 60(3), 531–542 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A.: Principles of Economics. Macmillan and Co., London (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P., Mayer, T., Mayneris, F.: Spatial concentration and plant-level productivity in France. J. Urban Econ. 69(2), 182–195 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouelhi, R.B.A.: Impact of trade liberalization on firm’s labour demand by skill: the case of Tunisian manufacturing. Labour Econ. 14(3), 539–563 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouelhi, R.B.A.: Impact of the adoption of information and communication technologies on firm efficiency in the Tunisian manufacturing sector. Econ. Model. 26(5), 961–967 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neffke, F., Henning, M., Boschma, R., Lundquist, K.-J., Olander, L.-O.: The dynamics of agglomeration externalities along the life cycle of industries. Reg. Stud. 45(1), 49–65 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberhofer, H., Pfaffermayr, M.: Firm growth in multinational corporate groups. Empir. Econ. 44, 1435–1453 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olley, S.G., Pakes, A.: The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64, 1263–1297 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raspe, O., van Oort, F.: Growth of new firms and spatially bounded knowledge externalities. Ann. Reg. Sci. 46(3), 495–518 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, P., Venables, A., Patacchini, E.: Spatial determinants of productivity: analysis for the regions of great Britain. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 36(6), 727–752 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.: Endogenous technological change. Technical report (1990)

  • Sargent, T.C., Rodriguez, E.R.: Labour or total factor productivity: do we need to choose? Int. Product. Monit. 1, 41–44 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Amara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amara, M., El Lahga, A. A note on MAR and Jacobs externalities in the Tunisian manufacturing industries. Lett Spat Resour Sci 8, 151–167 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-014-0121-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-014-0121-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation