Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hearing Outcome After Type I Tympanoplasty: A Retrospective Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the hearing outcomes using temporalis fascia graft for tympanic membrane reconstruction in type 1 tympanoplasty. It included 100 patients with tubotympanic type of chronic suppurative otitis media requiring only tympanic membrane reconstruction. Patients requiring ossicular reconstruction or with attico antral disease were excluded. Patients were assessed after 3, 6 months and 1 year for graft status and hearing outcome. Hearing evaluation was done using tuning fork tests and pure tone audiometry. In total, 88 out of 100 patients had intact and completely healed grafts at 1 year postoperatively (success rate of 88 %). The Hearing gain achieved was 14.55 dBs and the mean air bone gap reduction was 11.94 dBs. This reduction was statistically significant when compared to the pre operative hearing conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Browning GG et al Scott-brown’s otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery, 7th edn. 3:3421

  2. Khan NA (1992) Repair of traumatic perforation of tympanic membranes by a new technique. Pak J Otolaryngol 8:177–179

    Google Scholar 

  3. Javed M, Khan S, Ullah H, Shah J (2000) Onlay versus underlay myringoplasty, audiological results. Pak J Otolaryngol 16:59–60

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vrabec JT, Deskin RW, Grady JJ (1999) Meta-analysis of pediatric tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol 125(5):530–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ashfaq M, Aasim MU, Khan N (2004) Myringoplasty: anatomical and functional results. Pak Armed Forces Med J 54(2):155–158

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer AG, Albers FW et al (1997) Validation of hearing results in tympanoplasty. In: Huettenbrink (ed) Middle ear mechanics in researches and otosurgery. p 147–150

  7. Rizer FM (1997) Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Part I: historical review of the literature. Laryngoscope 107((12) suppl 84):1–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jalisi M, Khalid I, Khalid AA (1997) The human amniotic membrane graft material in tympanoplasty. Pak J Otolaryngol 13:11–12

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ogale SB, Bhaya MH, Verma S, Sheode JH (1992) Inferior based flap in myringoplasty. Pak J Otolaryngol 8:1315

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smyth GDL (1992) Toynbee memorial lecture 1992: facts and fantasies in modern otology: the ear doctor’s dilemma. J Laryngol Otol 106:591–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aslam N, Iqbal J, Mehmood K (2001) Type I tympanoplasty underlay technique and results. Proc Shaikh Zayed Postgrad Med Inst 15(2):77–80

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fadl FA (2003) Outcome of type-1 tympanoplasty. Saudi Med J 24(1):58–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Palva T (1987) Myringoplasty and tympanoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol 104:279–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gerber, Dornhoffer et al (2000) Hearing results after primary cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 111(12):1994–1999

  15. Gierek T, Slaska-Kaspera A, Majzel K, Klimczak-Golab L (2004) Results of myringoplasty and type I tympanoplasty with the use of fascia, cartilage and perichondrium grafts. Otolaryngol Pol 58:529–533

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wielgosz R, Mroczkowski E (2006) Assessment of the hearing results in tympanoplasties with the use of palisade-technique. Otolaryngol Pol 60:901–905

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Effat KG (2005) Results of inlay cartilage myringoplasty in terms of closure of central tympanic membrane perforations. J Laryngol Otol 119(8):611–613

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vos JD, Latev MD, Labadie RF, Cohen SM, Werkhaven JA, Haynes DS (2005) Use of Allo Derm in type I tympanoplasty: a comparison with native tissue grafts. Laryngoscope 115:1599–1602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fishman AJ, Huang TC, Kanowitz SJ (2005) Total tympanic membrane reconstruction: Allo Derm versus temporalis fascia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132(6):906–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Harvinder S, Hassan S, Sidek DS, Hamzah M, Samsudin AR, Philip R (2005) Underlay myringoplasty: comparison of human amniotic membrane to temporalis fascia graft. Med J Malays 60(5):585–589

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Emir H, Ceylan K, Kizilkaya Z, Gocmen H, Uzunkulaoglu H, Samim E (2007) Success is a matter of experience: type 1 tympanoplasty: influencing factors on type 1 tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264(6):595–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh M, Rai A, Bandyopadhyay S, Gupta SC (2003) Comparative study of the underlay and overlay techniques of myringoplasty in large and subtotal perforations of the tympanic membrane. J Laryngol Otol 117(6):444–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaurav Batni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Batni, G., Goyal, R. Hearing Outcome After Type I Tympanoplasty: A Retrospective Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 67, 39–42 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-014-0749-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-014-0749-8

Keywords

Navigation