Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neurocritical Care Quality Improvement Practices: A Survey of Members of the Neurocritical Care Society

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To describe current state of quality improvement (QI) processes implemented in neurocritical care units (NCCU).

Methods

A 27-question-survey was sent to 2000 members (physicians, nurses, and pharmacists) of the Neurocritical Care Society. We describe the prevalence of QI, satisfaction with existing QI processes, barriers to NCCU QI, awareness of stroke (STK, CSTK), stroke get with the guidelines (GWTG), trauma quality improvement program (TQIP) and American Academy of Neurology (AAN) performance measures.

Results

The response rate was 22.5%; 73.7% of respondents were from US teaching hospitals, 87.9% practiced in dedicated neurocritical care units, and 43.4% in a program with a NCC fellowship. 44.6 % reported a dedicated NCCU QI program. Overall, 42% of the respondents reported satisfaction with existing NCCU QI processes. External ventricular drain infection was the most commonly tracked NCC QI metric (69.6%). Respondents indicated the highest level of awareness for CSTK (87.5%), STK (81.8%), and GWTG (81.8%), but indicated a relative lack of awareness for TQIP (42.7%), and AAN (46.2%) performance measures. Insufficient hospital (57.7%) and departmental support (36.5%) were reported common barriers to the successful implementation of an NCCU QI program.

Conclusion

A dedicated staffed NCCU QI program occurs in a minority of NCC units, and the lack of such programs may lead to clinician dissatisfaction. Institutional and departmental support may be critical elements of a successful and satisfactory implementation of NCCU QI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. The Joint Commission. Comprehensive stroke certification: standardized performance measures. https://www.jointcommission.org/performance_measures_for_comprehensive_stroke_centers/. Published 2018. Accessed 28 Nov 2018.

  2. The Joint Commission. Stroke core measure sets. http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/Stroke.pdf. Published 2016 Updated 3/1/2016. Accessed 9 May 2016.

  3. American Heart Association. Get with the guidelines (GTWG) stroke. https://www.heart.org/en/professional/quality-improvement/get-with-the-guidelines/get-with-the-guidelines-stroke. Published 2018. Accessed 28 Nov 2018.

  4. The American College of Surgeons. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Best Practice Guidelines. https://www.facs.org/~/media/files/quality%20programs/trauma/tqip/traumatic%20brain%20injury%20guidelines.ashx. Published 2018. Accessed 28 Nov 28.

  5. American Academy Of Neurology. Inpatient and emergency neurology quality measurement set. American Medical Association. https://www.aan.com/siteassets/home-page/policy-and-guidelines/quality/quality-measures/17iemeasureset_pg.pdf. Published 2016. Accessed 28 Nov 2018.

  6. Institute of Translational Health Sciences. Research electronic data capture (REDCap). https://www.iths.org/investigators/services/bmi/redcap/. Published 2018. Accessed 23 Oct 2018.

  7. Vizient Inc. Patient safety organizations. Vizient Inc., clinical solutions web site. Published 2019. Accessed 25 Sept 2019.

  8. Moheet AM, Livesay SL, Abdelhak T, et al. Standards for neurologic critical care units: a statement for healthcare professionals from The Neurocritical Care Society. Neurocrit Care. 2018;29(2):145–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Members, Quality Committee of the Neurocritical Care Society

Navaz Karanjia, MD, Associate Professor of Neurosciences and Anesthesiology, UC San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, CA, USA; Michelle Hill, MS, RN, AGCNS-BC, CNRN, CCRN, SCRN, OhioHealth-Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA; Debra Roberts, MD, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Departments of Neurology, Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine and Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA; Casey Olm-Shipman, MD, MS, Assistant Professor, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Keith Dombrowski, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Julius Gene S Latorre, MD, MPH, FAAN, FAHA, Associate Professor of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA; Michael J. Souter, MB, ChB, FRCA, FNCS, Professor, Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Adjunct Professor, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA

Funding

No internal or external funding was used for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhijit V. Lele.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author AVL reports reserarch suport from Aqueduct Critical Care and salary support from Life Center Northwest. The other authors have no financial disclosures to report.

Ethics approval/informed consent

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Washington. Participation in the survey implies informed consent from the participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lele, A.V., The Quality Committee of the Neurocritical Care Society. & Moheet, A.M. Neurocritical Care Quality Improvement Practices: A Survey of Members of the Neurocritical Care Society. Neurocrit Care 32, 295–301 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00865-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00865-7

Keywords

Navigation