Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: What now and what next?

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, improved laparoscopic skill sets have expanded surgical management of pancreatic disease to encompass pancreatic resection, tumor enucleation, débridement, and drainage. With the aid of radio-logically guided drainage catheters, necrosectomy for acute pancreatitis can be delayed and accomplished laparoscopically in a select patient population. Pancreatic pseudocysts from chronic pancreatitis can now be approached via minimally invasive strategies, including emerging combined laparoendoscopic procedures and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. It is clear that laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is possible in experienced hands; pancreatic neoplasms in the body and tail are more suitable for laparoscopic procedures because distal pancreatic resection requires no reconstruction of the biliary or enteric tract. Laparoscopic staging of pancreatic tumors has decreased as preoperative radiographic imaging becomes more sensitive. Similarly, laparoscopic palliative procedures have decreased because of the emergence of other minimally invasive options for relieving gastric outlet obstruction and biliary obstruction. Nonetheless, major advances in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery will continue as technology and skill sets advance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Loveday BP, Mittal A, Phillips A, Windsor JA: Minimally invasive management of pancreatic abscess, pseudocyst, and necrosis: a systematic review of current guidelines. World J Surg 2008, 32:2383–2394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Connor S, Alexakis N, Raraty MG, et al.: Early and late complications after pancreatic necrosectomy. Surgery 2005, 137:499–505.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bollen TL, et al.: Casematched comparison of the retroperitoneal approach with laparotomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. World J Surg 2007, 31:1635–1642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Nieuwenhuijs VB, et al.: Minimally invasive ’step-up approach’ versus maximal necrosectomy in patients with acute necrotising pancreatitis (PANTER trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN13975868]. BMC Surg 2006, 6:6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cinquepalmi L, Boni L, Dionigi G, et al.: Long-term results and quality of life of patients undergoing sequential surgical treatment for severe acute pancreatitis complicated by infected pancreatic necrosis. Surg Infect 2006, 7(Suppl 2):S113–S116.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heider R, Meyer AA, Galanko JA, Behrns KE: Percutaneous drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a higher failure rate than surgical treatment in unselected patients. Ann Surg 1999, 229:781–787.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vitas GJ, Sarr MG: Selected management of pancreatic pseudocysts: operative versus expectant management. Surgery 1992, 111:123–130.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yeo CJ, Bastidas JA, Lynch-Nyhan A, et al.: The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts documented by computed tomography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990, 170:411–417.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Heider TR, Azeem S, Galanko JA, Behrns KE: The natural history of pancreatitis-induced splenic vein thrombosis. Ann Surg 2004, 239:876–880.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Park AE, Heniford BT: Therapeutic laparoscopy of the pancreas. Ann Surg 2002, 236:149–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roth JS, Park AE: Laparoscopic pancreatic cystgastrostomy—the lesser sac technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2001, 11:201–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Siperstein A: Laparoendoscopic approach to pancreatic pseudocysts. Semin Laparosc Surg 2001, 8:218–222.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mori T, Abe N, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y: Laparoscopic pancreatic cystgastrostomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002, 9:548–554.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Way LW, Legha P, Mori T: Laparoscopic pancreatic cystogastrostomy: the first operation in the new field of intraluminal laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1994, 8:235–239.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Atabek U, Mayer D, Amin A, et al.: Pancreatic cystogastrostomy by combined upper endoscopy and percutaneous transgastric instrumentation. J Laparoendosc Surg 1993, 3:501–504.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gagner M: Laparoscopic transgastric cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst [abstract S55]. Surg Endosc 1994, 8:239.

    Google Scholar 

  17. TrÍas M, Targarona EM, Balagué C, et al.: Intraluminal stapled laparoscopic cystogastrostomy for treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst. Br J Surg 1995, 82:403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Park A, Schwartz R: Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. Am J Surg 1999, 177:158–163.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cuschieri A: Laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1994, 39:178–184.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gagner M, Pomp A, Herrera MF: Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors. Surgery 1996, 120:1051–1054.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lawson JM, Biallie J: Endoscopic therapy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Clin North Am 1995, 5:181–193.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Meltzer RC, Amaral JF: Laparoscopic pancreatic cystgastrostomy. Minimally Invasive Ther 1999, 3:289–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Adams DB, Anderson MC: Percutaneous catheter drainage compared with internal drainage in the management of pancreatic pseudocyst. Ann Surg 1992, 215:571–578.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Criado E, DeStefano AA, Weiner TM, et al.: Long-term results of percutaneous catheter drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992, 175:293–298.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, et al.: Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 60:114–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ryou M, Fong DG, Pai RD, et al.: Dual-port distal pancreatectomy using a prototype endoscope and endoscopic stapler: a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) survival study in a porcine model. Endoscopy 2007, 10:881–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sarr MG, Murr M, Smyrk TC, et al.: Primary cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Neoplastic disorders of emerging importance: state of the art and unanswered questions. J Gastrointest Surg 2003, 7:417–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thompson LD, Becker RC, Przygodski RM, et al.: Mucinous cystic neoplasm (mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of low-grade malignant potential) of the pancreas: a clinicopathologic study of 130 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1999, 23:1–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Talamini MA, Moesinger R, Yeo CJ, et al.: Cystadenomas of the pancreas: Is enucleation an adequate operation? Ann Surg 1998, 227:896–903.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee KK, Chen D, Hughes SJ: Minimally invasive treatment of pancreatic disease. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 2007, 36:441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cuschieri SA, Jamikowicz JJ: Laparoscopic pancreatic resections. Semin Laparosc Surg 1998, 5:168–179.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pugliese R, Scandroglio I, Sansonna F, et al.: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective review of 19 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2008, 18:13–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Matsumoto T, Shibata K, Ohta M, et al.: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy: a nonrandomized comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2008, 18:340–343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Toniato A, Meduri F, Foletto M, et al.: Laparoscopic treatment of benign insulinomas localized in the body and tail of the pancreas: a single-center experience. World J Surg 2006, 30:1916–1919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sweet MP, Izumisato Y, Way LW, et al.: Laparoscopic enucleation of insulinomas. Arch Surg 2007, 142:1202–1204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Conlon KC, Dougherty E, Klimstra DS, et al.: The value of minimal access surgery in the staging of patients with potentially resectable peripancreatic malignancy. Ann Surg 1996, 223:134–140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Friess H, Kleeff J, Silva JC, et al.: The role of diagnostic laparoscopy in pancreatic and periampullary malignancies. J Am Coll Surg 1998, 186:675–682.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Nieveen van Dijkum EJ, Romijn MG, Terwee CB, et al.: Laparoscopic staging and subsequent palliation in patients with peripancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg 2003, 237:66–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. White R, Winston C, Gonen M, et al.: Current utility of staging laparoscopy for pancreatic and peripancreatic neoplasms. J Am Coll Surg 2008, 206:445–450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Urbach DR, Bell CM, Swanstrom LL, Hansen PD: Cohort study of surgical bypass to the gallbladder or bile duct for the palliation of jaundice due to pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 2003, 237:86–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mittal A, Windsor J, Woodfield J, et al.: Matched study of three methods for palliation of malignant pyloroduodenal obstruction. Br J Surg 2004, 91:205–209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Fiori E, Lamazza A, Volpino P, et al.: Palliative management of malignant antro-pyloric strictures. Gastroenterostomy vs. endoscopic stenting. A randomized prospective trial. Anticancer Res 2004, 24:269–271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hosono S, Ohtani H, Arimoto Y, Kanamiya Y: Endoscopic stenting versus surgical gastroenterostomy for palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction: a meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol 2007, 42:283–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mehta S, Hindmarsh A, Cheong E, et al.: Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy versus duodenal stenting for malignant gastric outflow obstruction. Surg Endosc 2006, 20:239–242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Siddiqui A, Spechler SJ, Huerta S: Surgical bypass versus endoscopic stenting for malignant gastroduodenal obstruction: a decision analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2007, 52:276–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kazanjian KK, Reber HA, Hines OJ: Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy for gastric outlet obstruction in pancreatic cancer. Am Surg 2004, 70:910–913.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Fernandez-Cruz L, Martinez I, Gilabert R, et al.: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy combined with preservation of the spleen for cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 2004, 8:493–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Warshaw AL: Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 1988, 123:550–553.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Takaori K, Tanigawa N: Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: the past, present and future. Surg Today 2007, 37:535–545.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Cuschieri A: Laparoscopic hand-assisted surgery for hepatic and pancreatic disease. Surg Endosc 2000, 14:991–996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Room 6164, Box 100109, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA

    Kevin E. Behrns

Authors
  1. Elizabeth A. Warner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kfir Ben-David
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juan C. Cendan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kevin E. Behrns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin E. Behrns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warner, E.A., Ben-David, K., Cendan, J.C. et al. Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: What now and what next?. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 11, 128–133 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-009-0020-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-009-0020-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation