Abstract
The study objective was to assess the effect of increased experience on complications in robotic hysterectomy for malignant and benign gynecological disease. This is a retrospective cohort study. It is a Canadian Task Force classification II-2 study conducted at the University Hospital, Sweden. The patients were 949 women planned for robotic hysterectomy for malignant (75 %) and benign (25 %) gynecological disease between October 2005 and December 2013. They were continuously evaluated for the rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications up to 1-year post-surgery, the latter according to Clavien–Dindo classification following the introduction of robotic surgery with special awareness of complications possibly related to robot-specific risk factors, the description of refinement of practice and assessment of the effect of these measures. The rate of intraoperative complications, the overall rate of complications and the rate of ≥grade 3 complications decreased from the first to the last time period (4.8 vs 2.6 %, p = 0.037, 34 vs 19 %, p = 0.003 and 13.5 vs 3.2 %, p = 0.0003, respectively). The rate of intraoperative complications and the rate of postoperative complications possibly related to robot-specific risk factors was reduced from the first to the last time period (3.8 vs 0.6 %, p = 0.028 and 7.7 vs 1.5 %, p = 0.003, respectively). In patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy for malignant and benign gynecological disease intraoperative and postoperative complications and complications possibly related to the robotic approach diminish with training, experience and refinement of practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB (2009) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8(3):CD003677
Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, Domush R, Nakagawa S, Jacoby A (2009) Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol 114(5):1041–1048
Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, Spiegel G, Barakat R, Pearl ML, Sharma SK (2009) Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: gynecologic oncology group study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 27(32):5331–5336 (Epub 2009 Oct 5)
Galaal K, Bryant A, Fisher AD, Al-Khaduri M, Kew F, Lopes AD (2012) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer (Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 9
Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL (2013) Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA 309(7):689–698
Wright JD, Burke WM, Wilde ET, Lewin SN, Charles AS, Kim JH, Goldman N, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL (2012) Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(8):783–791
Lönnerfors C, Persson J (2013) Implementation and applications or robotic surgery within gynecologic oncology and gynecology; analysis of first thousand cases. Ceska Gynekol 78:12–19
Persson J, Reynisson P, Borgfeldt C, Kannisto P, Lindahl B, Bossmar T (2009) Robot assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with short and long term morbidity data. Gynecol Oncol 113:185–190
Geppert B, Lönnerfors C, Persson J (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese women: surgical technique and comparison with open surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(11):1210–1217 (Epub 2011 Sep 23)
Lönnerfors C, Reynisson P, Persson J (2015) A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22(1):78–86 (Epub 2014 Jul 19)
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213
Clavien PA, Strasberg SM (2009) Severity grading of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250(2):197–198
Nick AM, Lange J, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Schlumbrecht MP, dos Reis R, Ramirez PT (2011) Rate of vaginal cuff separation following laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 120(1):47–51 (Epub 2010 Sep 24)
Gruber DD, Warner WB, Lombardini ED, Zahn CM, Buller JL (2011) Laparoscopic hysterectomy using various energy sources in swine: a histopathologic assessment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:494–496
Backes FJ, Brudie LA, Farrell MR, Ahmad S, Finkler NJ, Bigsby GE, O´Malley D, Cohn DE, Holloway RW, Fowler JM (2012) Short- and long-term morbidity and outcomes after robotic surgery for comprehensive endometrial cancer staging. Gynecol Oncol 125:546–551
Paley PJ, Veljovich DS, Shah CA, Everett EN, Bondurant AE, Drescher CW, Peters WA 3rd (2011) Surgical outcomes in gynecologic oncology in the era of robotics: analysis of first 1000 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:551.e1–9
Kho RM, Akl MN, Jl Cornella, Magtibay PM, Wechter ME, Magrina JF (2009) Incidence and characteristics of patients with vaginal cuff dehiscence after robotic procedures. Obstet Gynecol 114(2 Pt 1):231–235
Kaye AD, Vadivelu N, Ahuja N, Mitra S, Silasi D, Urman RD (2013) Anesthetic considerations in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery. Ochsner J 13(4):517–524
Beck S, Skarecky D, Osann K, Juarez R, Ahlering TE (2011) Transverse versus vertical camera port incision in robotic radical prostatectomy: effect on incisional hernias and cosmesis. Urology 78(3):586–590 (Epub 2011 Jul 8)
Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, Fowler WC (2008) A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(4):360
Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, Kim KH, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS, Fowler JM (2009) Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 113(1):36–41 (Epub 2009 Jan 24)
Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S (2008) Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 111(2):407–411 (Epub 2008 Oct 1)
Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns TD (2009) A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 113(2):191–194 (Epub 2009 Feb 26)
Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Adams S, Bhat SB, Randall TC (2010) Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center. Gynecol Oncol 117(2):224–228 (Epub 2010 Feb 7)
Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, Ahmad S, Di Silverio E, Spinillo A (2010) Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 116(6):1422–1431
Wechter ME, Mohd J, Magrina JF, Cornella JL, Magtibay PM, Wilson JR, Kho RM (2014) Complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type: a 6-year retrospective cohort study using Clavien–Dindo classification. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(5):844–850 (Epub 2014 Mar 31)
Barnett JC, Havrilesky LJ, Bondurant AE, Fleming ND, Lee PS, Secord AA, Berchuck A, Valea FA (2011) Adverse events associated with laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205(2):143.e1–6. (Epub 2011 Mar 16)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No financial support was received for this study.
Conflict of interest
Jan Persson is a proctor in robotic surgery. Celine Lönnerfors declares she has no conflict of interest. Petur Reynisson declares he has no conflict of interest. Barbara Geppert declares she has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. An Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lönnerfors, C., Reynisson, P., Geppert, B. et al. The effect of increased experience on complications in robotic hysterectomy for malignant and benign gynecological disease. J Robotic Surg 9, 321–330 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0534-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0534-z