Skip to main content
Log in

The Safety and Efficacy of Procedureless Gastric Balloon: a Study Examining the Effect of Elipse Intragastric Balloon Safety, Short and Medium Term Effects on Weight Loss with 1-Year Follow-Up Post-removal

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The Ellipse intragastric balloon (EIGB) is a new swallowable balloon that does not require endoscopy at insertion or removal. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety of EIGB and its efficiency in weight reduction even after 1 year of expulsion.

Method

Prospective study on our initial experience with a consecutive group of patients who underwent the insertion of EIGB in the period between September 2016 and February 2017. The patients were followed up to assess pain, nausea, and vomiting after procedure. As well as, the time of balloon extraction, route of extraction, and weight loss.

Results

Total of 112 patients underwent EIGB placement. A 1-year follow-up was obtained on 85% of patients. Mean weight and BMI before the procedure 92.2 kg and 34.3 kg/m2, respectively. One patient had small bowel obstruction. Six patients did not tolerate EIGB and three patients had early deflation. Total weight loss % (TWL%) 10.7, 10.9, and 7.9% at 3, 6, and at date of last follow-up. When data were stratified according to BMI into two groups: group 1 (BMI 27.5–34.9) and group 2 (BMI 35–49), the TWL% for group 1 at 3 months, 6 months, and last day of follow-up are as follows: 10.2%, 10.6%, and 8.8%, while it was 11.5%, 11.2%, and 6.6% for group 2.

Conclusion

EIGB are effective, safe, and feasible non-invasive method for weight loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nunes GC, Pajecki D, de Melo ME, et al. Assessment of weight loss with the intragastric balloon in patients with different degrees of obesity. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017;27(4):e83–e6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meshkinpour H, Hsu D, Farivar S. Effect of gastric bubble as a weight reduction device: a controlled, crossover study. Gastroenterology. 1988;95(3):589–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Machytka E, Chuttani R, Bojkova M, et al. Elipse, a procedureless gastric balloon for weight loss: a proof-of-concept pilot study. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):512–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jung F, Dietrich A, Stroh C, et al. Changes in attitudes towards bariatric surgery after 5 years in the German general public. Obes Surg. 2017;27(10):2754–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stanford FC, Kyle TK, Claridy MD, et al. The influence of an individual’s weight perception on the acceptance of bariatric surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015;23(2):277–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Genco A, Dellepiane D, Baglio G, et al. Adjustable intragastric balloon vs non-adjustable intragastric balloon: case-control study on complications, tolerance, and efficacy. Obes Surg. 2013;23(7):953–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Genco A, Cipriano M, Materia A, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus intragastric balloon: a case-control study. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(8):1849–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Force ABET, Committee AT, Abu Dayyeh BK, et al. Endoscopic bariatric therapies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(5):1073–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Force ABET, Committee AT, Abu Dayyeh BK, et al. ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting endoscopic bariatric therapies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(3):425–38. e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mathus-Vliegen EMH. Is endoscopy really necessary for placing intragastric balloons? Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):169–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alsabah S, Al Haddad E, Ekrouf S, et al. The safety and efficacy of the procedureless intragastric balloon. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(3):311–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Imaz I, Martínez-Cervell C, García-Álvarez EE, et al. Safety and effectiveness of the intragastric balloon for obesity. A meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2008;18:841–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad H. Jamal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval for conducting the study was obtained from Kuwait University Ethical committee and Kuwait Ministry of Health.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jamal, M.H., Almutairi, R., Elabd, R. et al. The Safety and Efficacy of Procedureless Gastric Balloon: a Study Examining the Effect of Elipse Intragastric Balloon Safety, Short and Medium Term Effects on Weight Loss with 1-Year Follow-Up Post-removal. OBES SURG 29, 1236–1241 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-03671-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-03671-w

Keywords

Navigation