Abstract
Primary sensory cortices can respond not only to their defined sensory modality but also to cross-modal information. In addition to the observed cross-modal phenomenon, it is valuable to research further whether cross-modal information can be valuable for categorizing stimuli and what effect other factors, such as experience and imagination, may have on cross-modal processing. In this study, we researched cross-modal information processing in the early visual cortex (EVC, including the visual area 1, 2, and 3 (V1, V2, and V3)) and auditory cortex (primary (A1) and secondary (A2) auditory cortex). Images and sound clips were presented to participants separately in two experiments in which participants’ imagination and expectations were restricted by an orthogonal fixation task and the data were collected by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We successfully decoded categories of the cross-modal stimuli in the ROIs except for V1 by multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA). It was further shown that familiar sounds had the advantage of classification accuracies in V2 and V3 when compared with unfamiliar sounds. The results of the cross-classification analysis showed that there was no significant similarity between the activity patterns induced by different stimulus modalities. Even though the cross-modal representation is robust when considering the restriction of top-down expectations and mental imagery in our experiments, the sound experience showed effects on cross-modal representation in V2 and V3. In addition, primary sensory cortices may receive information from different modalities in different ways, so the activity patterns between two modalities were not similar enough to complete the cross-classification successfully.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albers, A. M., Kok, P., Toni, I., Dijkerman, H. C., & de Lange, F. P. (2013). Shared representations for working memory and mental imagery in early visual cortex. Current Biology, 23(15), 1427–1431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.065.
Axelrod, V., & Yovel, G. (2012). Hierarchical processing of face viewpoint in human visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(7), 2442–2452. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4770-11.2012.
Beer, A. L., Plank, T., & Greenlee, M. W. (2011). Diffusion tensor imaging shows white matter tracts between human auditory and visual cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 213(2–3), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2715-y.
Beer, A. L., Plank, T., Meyer, G., & Greenlee, M. W. (2013). Combined diffusion-weighted and functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals a temporal-occipital network involved in auditory-visual object processing. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 7, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2013.00005.
Benetti, S., van Ackeren, M. J., Rabini, G., Zonca, J., Foa, V., Baruffaldi, F., et al. (2017). Functional selectivity for face processing in the temporal voice area of early deaf individuals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(31), E6437–E6446. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618287114.
Bieler, M., Sieben, K., Cichon, N., Schildt, S., Roder, B., & Hanganu-Opatz, I. L. (2017a). Rate and temporal coding convey multisensory information in primary sensory cortices. eNeuro, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0037-17.2017.
Bieler, M., Sieben, K., Schildt, S., Roder, B., & Hanganu-Opatz, I. L. (2017b). Visual-tactile processing in primary somatosensory cortex emerges before cross-modal experience. Synapse, 71(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.21958.
Braga, R. M., Hellyer, P. J., Wise, R. J., & Leech, R. (2017). Auditory and visual connectivity gradients in frontoparietal cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 38(1), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23358.
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011). LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2(27), 21–27:27.
Collignon, O., Dormal, G., Albouy, G., Vandewalle, G., Voss, P., Phillips, C., et al. (2013). Impact of blindness onset on the functional organization and the connectivity of the occipital cortex. Brain, 136(Pt9), 2769–2783. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt176.
Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33(1–2), 25–62.
de Haas, B., Schwarzkopf, D. S., Urner, M., & Rees, G. (2013). Auditory modulation of visual stimulus encoding in human retinotopic cortex. NeuroImage, 70, 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.061.
Driver, J., & Noesselt, T. (2008). Multisensory interplay reveals crossmodal influences on 'sensory-specific' brain regions, neural responses, and judgments. Neuron, 57(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.12.013.
Eckert, M. A., Kamdar, N. V., Chang, C. E., Beckmann, C. F., Greicius, M. D., & Menon, V. (2008). A cross-modal system linking primary auditory and visual cortices: evidence from intrinsic fMRI connectivity analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 29(7), 848–857. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20560.
Eickhoff, S. B., Stephan, K. E., Mohlberg, H., Grefkes, C., Fink, G. R., Amunts, K., et al. (2005). A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. NeuroImage, 25(4), 1325–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034.
Geng, X., Xu, J., Liu, B., & Shi, Y. (2018). Multivariate classification of major depressive disorder using the effective connectivity and functional connectivity. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 38. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00038.
Ghazanfar, A. A., & Schroeder, C. E. (2006). Is neocortex essentially multisensory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(6), 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.008.
Harrison, S. A., & Tong, F. (2009). Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas. Nature, 458(7238), 632–635. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07832.
Hsieh, P. J., Colas, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (2012). Spatial pattern of BOLD fMRI activation reveals cross-modal information in auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107(12), 3428–3432. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01094.2010.
Iordan, M. C., Greene, M. R., Beck, D. M., & Fei-Fei, L. (2015). Basic level category structure emerges gradually across human ventral visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(7), 1427–1446. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00790.
Iordan, M. C., Greene, M. R., Beck, D. M., & Fei-Fei, L. (2016). Typicality sharpens category representations in object-selective cortex. NeuroImage, 134, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.012.
Iurilli, G., Ghezzi, D., Olcese, U., Lassi, G., Nazzaro, C., Tonini, R., et al. (2012). Sound-driven synaptic inhibition in primary visual cortex. Neuron, 73(4), 814–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.026.
Kayser, C., Petkov, C. I., & Logothetis, N. K. (2008). Visual modulation of neurons in auditory cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 18(7), 1560–1574. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm187.
Klemen, J., & Chambers, C. D. (2012). Current perspectives and methods in studying neural mechanisms of multisensory interactions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.04.015.
Klinge, C., Eippert, F., Roder, B., & Buchel, C. (2010). Corticocortical connections mediate primary visual cortex responses to auditory stimulation in the blind. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(38), 12798–12805. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2384-10.2010.
Kok, P., Failing, M. F., & de Lange, F. P. (2014). Prior expectations evoke stimulus templates in the primary visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(7), 1546–1554. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00562.
Lee, H. K., & Whitt, J. L. (2015). Cross-modal synaptic plasticity in adult primary sensory cortices. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 35, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2015.08.002.
Liang, M., Mouraux, A., Hu, L., & Iannetti, G. D. (2013a). Primary sensory cortices contain distinguishable spatial patterns of activity for each sense. Nature Communications, 4, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2979.
Liang, M., Mouraux, A., & Iannetti, G. D. (2013b). Bypassing primary sensory cortices--a direct thalamocortical pathway for transmitting salient sensory information. Cerebral Cortex, 23(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr363.
Liang, Y., Liu, B., Xu, J., Zhang, G., Li, X., Wang, P., et al. (2017). Decoding facial expressions based on face-selective and motion-sensitive areas. Human Brain Mapping, 38(6), 3113–3125. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23578.
Liang, Y., Liu, B., Li, X., & Wang, P. (2018). Multivariate pattern classification of facial expressions based on large-scale functional connectivity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00094.
Lo Verde, L., Morrone, M. C., & Lunghi, C. (2017). Early cross-modal plasticity in adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(3), 520–529. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01067.
Man, K., Kaplan, J. T., Damasio, A., & Meyer, K. (2012). Sight and sound converge to form modality-invariant representations in temporoparietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(47), 16629–16636. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2342-12.2012.
Man, K., Damasio, A., Meyer, K., & Kaplan, J. T. (2015). Convergent and invariant object representations for sight, sound, and touch. Human Brain Mapping, 36(9), 3629–3640. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22867.
Mesulam, M. M. (1998). From sensation to cognition. Brain, 121(Pt 6), 1013–1052. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.6.1013.
Meyer, K., & Damasio, A. (2009). Convergence and divergence in a neural architecture for recognition and memory. Trends in Neurosciences, 32(7), 376–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2009.04.002.
Meyer, K., Kaplan, J. T., Essex, R., Webber, C., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. (2010). Predicting visual stimuli on the basis of activity in auditory cortices. Nature Neuroscience, 13(6), 667–668. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2533.
Meyer, K., Kaplan, J. T., Essex, R., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. (2011). Seeing touch is correlated with content-specific activity in primary somatosensory cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 21(9), 2113–2121. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq289.
Petro, L. S., Paton, A. T., & Muckli, L. (2017). Contextual modulation of primary visual cortex by auditory signals. In Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0104.
Renier, L., De Volder, A. G., & Rauschecker, J. P. (2014). Cortical plasticity and preserved function in early blindness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 41, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.025.
Ricciardi, E., Bonino, D., Pellegrini, S., & Pietrini, P. (2014). Mind the blind brain to understand the sighted one! Is there a supramodal cortical functional architecture? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 41, 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.10.006.
Rohe, T., & Noppeney, U. (2016). Distinct computational principles govern multisensory integration in primary sensory and association cortices. Current Biology, 26(4), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.056.
Sieben, K., Roder, B., & Hanganu-Opatz, I. L. (2013). Oscillatory entrainment of primary somatosensory cortex encodes visual control of tactile processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(13), 5736–5749. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4432-12.2013.
Sieben, K., Bieler, M., Roder, B., & Hanganu-Opatz, I. L. (2015). Neonatal restriction of tactile inputs leads to long-lasting impairments of cross-modal processing. PLoS Biology, 13(11), e1002304. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002304.
Smith, F. W., & Goodale, M. A. (2015). Decoding visual object categories in early somatosensory cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 25(4), 1020–1031. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht292.
Vetter, P., Smith, F. W., & Muckli, L. (2014). Decoding sound and imagery content in early visual cortex. Current Biology, 24(11), 1256–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.020.
Werner, S., & Noppeney, U. (2010). Distinct functional contributions of primary sensory and association areas to audiovisual integration in object categorization. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(7), 2662–2675. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5091-09.2010.
Wolbers, T., Zahorik, P., & Giudice, N. A. (2011). Decoding the direction of auditory motion in blind humans. NeuroImage, 56(2), 681–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.266.
Xu, J., Yin, X., Ge, H., Han, Y., Pang, Z., Liu, B., et al. (2016). Heritability of the effective connectivity in the resting-state default mode network. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw332.
Yang, X., Xu, J., Cao, L., Li, X., Wang, P., Wang, B., et al. (2017). Linear representation of emotions in whole persons by combining facial and bodily expressions in the Extrastriate body area. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 653. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00653.
Zeidman, P., Mullally, S. L., & Maguire, E. A. (2015). Constructing, perceiving, and maintaining scenes: Hippocampal activity and connectivity. Cerebral Cortex, 25(10), 3836–3855. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu266.
Zhang, G., Cheng, Y., & Liu, B. (2017). Abnormalities of voxel-based whole-brain functional connectivity patterns predict the progression of hepatic encephalopathy. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 11(3), 784–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-016-9553-2.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1736219 and No.61571327).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Jin Gu, Baolin Liu, Xianglin Li, Peiyuan Wang, Bin Wang declare that they have no actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work. All of the authors declare that the work described in the manuscript was original research that has not been published previously, and was not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Tianjin University. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, and the applicable revisions at the time of the investigation.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects for being included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gu, J., Liu, B., Li, X. et al. Cross-modal representations in early visual and auditory cortices revealed by multi-voxel pattern analysis. Brain Imaging and Behavior 14, 1908–1920 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-019-00135-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-019-00135-2