Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An indicator-based approach to assess village-level social and biophysical vulnerability of agriculture communities in Uttarakhand, India

  • Mountain Development
  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the growing recognition to myriad forms of current and future threats in the mountain agriculture systems, there is a pressing need to holistically understand the vulnerability of mountain agriculture communities. The study aims to assess the biophysical and social vulnerability of agriculture communities using an indicator-based approach for the state of Uttarakhand, India. A total of 14 indicators were used to capture biophysical vulnerability and 22 for social vulnerability profiles of 15285 villages. Vulnerability analysis was done at village level with weights assigned to each indicator using Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP). The results of the study highlight the presence of very high biophysical vulnerability (0.82 ± 0.10) and high social vulnerability (0.65 ± 0.15) within the state. Based on the results, it was found that incidences of high biophysical vulnerability coincide with presence of intensified agriculture land and absence of dense forest. Higher social vulnerability scores were found in villages with an absence of local institutions (like Self Helping Groups (SHGs)), negligible infrastructure facilities and higher occupational dependence on agriculture. A contrast was observed in the vulnerability scores of villages present in the three different altitudinal zones in the study area, indicating respective vulnerability generating conditions existing in these three zones. Biophysical vulnerability was recorded to be highest in the villages falling in the lower zone and lowest in the upper zone villages; whereas, social vulnerability was found to be highest in the middle zone villages and lowest in lower zone villages. Our study aids policy makers in identifying areas for intervention to expedite agriculture adaptation planning in the state. Additionally, the adaptation programmes in the region need to be more context-specific to accommodate the differential altitudinal vulnerability profiles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16(3): 268–281. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeon V, Bates S (2015) Reviewing Composite Vulnerability and Resilience Indexes: A Sustainable Approach and Application. World Development 72: 140–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aryal S, Cockfield G, Maraseni TN (2014) Vulnerability of Himalayan transhumant communities to climate change. Climatic Change 125(2): 193–208. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-014-1157-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barua A, Katyaini S (2014) Climate change and poverty: building resilience of rural mountain communities in South Sikkim, Eastern Himalaya, India. 14(1): 267–280. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-013-0471-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks N (2003) Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: A conceptual framework. Tyndall Centre Working Paper 38. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks N, Adger WN, Kelly PM (2005) The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environmental Change 15(2): 151–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, et al. (2006) Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World. Available online at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art8/ (Accessed on 5 May 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra A, Pardha Saradhi P, Rao KS, et al (2010) Assessment of monetary budget in traditional agrodiversity management: A case study of central himalayan village ecosystem. Phytomorphology: An International Journal of Plant Morphology 60(3/4): 137–149. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-011-1081-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapagain B, Gentle P (2015) Withdrawing from Agrarian Livelihoods:Environmental Migration in Nepal. Journal of Mountain Science 12: 1–13. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-014-3017-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography 20(4): 529–539. DOI: 10.1177/030913259602000407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dharmaveer S, Jain SK, Dev GR (2015) Trend in Obsserved and Proojected Maximmum and Minimmum Temperature over N-W Himalayan Basin. Journal of Mountain Science 12(2): 417–433. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-013-2889-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimri AP, Yasunari T, Wiltshire A, et al (2013) Application of regional climate models to the Indian winter monsoon over the western Himalayas. The Science of the total environment 468-469 Su: S36–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin HC, Patt A (2011) Are adaptation studies effective, and what can enhance their practical impact? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2(2): 141–153. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.100

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen S, Kelly P (2007) Developing credible vulnerability indicators for climate adaptation policy assessment. Mitigation Adaptation Strategies to Global Change 12(4): 495–524. DOI: 10.1007/s11027-006-3460-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel H-M (2007) Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change 17(2): 155–167. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallopin G (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change 16: 293–303. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentle P, Maraseni TN (2012) Climate change, poverty and livelihoods: Adaptation practices by rural mountain communities in Nepal. Environmental Science and Policy 21: 24–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlitz JY, Banerjee S, Brooks N, et al. (2015) An Approach to Measure Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change in the Hindu Kush Himalayas. In: Filho WL (ed.), Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg. pp 1–22. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38670-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Uttarakhand (GoU) (2012) State Action Plan on Climate Change “Transforming Crisis into Opportunity”. Uttarakhand State Action Plan for Climate Change. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. Avaliable online at: http://www.moef.gov.in/sites/default/files/Uttarakhand%20SAPCC.pdf (Assessed on 7 May 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) (2011) Framework for Community-Based Climate Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment in Mountain Areas. ICIMOD Publications Unit, Kathmandu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ionescu C, Klein RT, Hinkel J, et al. (2009) Towards a Formal Framework of Vulnerability to Climate Change. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 14(1): 1–16. DOI: 10.1007/s10666-008-9179-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Summary for Policymakers. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ et al. (eds.) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jodha NS (2007) Mountain commons: Changing space and status at community levels in the Himalayas. Journal of Mountain Science 4(2): 124–135. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-007-0124-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kala CP (2014) Deluge, disaster and development in Uttarakhand Himalayan region of India: Challenges and lessons for disaster management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 8: 143–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap SD, Dagar JC, Pant KS, et al. (2014) Soil Conservation and Ecosystem Stability: Natural Resource Management through Agroforestry in Northwestern Himalayan Region. In: Agroforestry Systems in India: Livelihood Security & Ecosystem Services. Volume 10 of the series Advances in Agroforestry. pp 21–55. DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1662-9_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kelkar U, Narula KK, Sharma VP, et al. (2008) Vulnerability and adaptation to climate variability and water stress in Uttarakhand State, India. Global Environmental Change 18(4): 564–574. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly PM, Adger WN (2000) Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change 47(4): 325–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuniyal JC (2003) Regional imbalances and sustainable crop farming in the Uttaranchal Himalaya, India. Ecological Economics 46(3): 419–435. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00165-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liverman DM (1990) Vulnerability to global environmental change. In: Kasperson RE, Dow K, Golding D (eds.), Understanding Global Environmental Change: The Contributions of Risk Analysis and Management (Chapter 26). Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maikhuri RK, Ramakrishnan PS (1990) Ecological analysis of a cluster of Villages emphasising land use of different tribes in Meghalaya in North-east India. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 31(1): 17–37. DOI: 10.1016/0167-8809(90)90152-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munsi M, Areendran G, Joshi PK (2012) Modeling spatio-temporal change patterns of forest cover: a case study from the Himalayan foothills (India). Regional Environmental Change 12(3): 619–632. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-011-0272-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negi VS, Maikhuri RK (2013) Socio-ecological and religious perspective of agrobiodiversity conservation: Issues, concern and priority for sustainable agriculture, central. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26(2): 491–512. DOI: 10.1007/s10806-012-9386-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negi VS, Maikhuri RK, Rawat LS (2012) Paradigm and ecological implication of changing agricultural land-use: A case study from Govind Wildlife Sanctuary, Central Himalaya, India. Journal of Mountain Science 9(4): 547–557. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-012-2216-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols CE (2015) Geoforum Shifting production / shifting consumption : A political ecology of health perceptions in Kumaon, India. Geoforum 64: 182–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.06.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Schjolden A, et al. (2007) Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Climate Policy 7(1): 73–88. DOI: 10.3763/cpol.2007.0706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien K, Leichenko R, Kelkar U, et al (2004) Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Global Environmental Change 14(4): 303–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey R, Jha S (2012) Climate vulnerability index-measure of climate change vulnerability to communities: a case of rural Lower Himalaya, India. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 17(5): 487–506. DOI: 10.1007/s11027-011-9338-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey R, Meena D, Aretano R, et al (2015) Socio-ecological Vulnerability of Smallholders due to Climate Change in Mountains: Agroforestry as an Adaptation Measure. Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems 2(1): 26–41. DOI: 10.1515/cass-2015-0003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston BL, Yuen EJ, Westaway RM (2011) Putting vulnerability to climate change on the map: a review of approaches, benefits, and risks. Sustainability Science 6(2): 177–202. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-011-0129-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh S, Jain S, Sharma P, Bhahuguna R (2014) Assessment of inherent vulnerability of rural communities to environmental hazards in kimsar region of Uttarakhand, India. Environmental Development 12: 16–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.envdev.2014.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan PS (2007) Sustainable mountain development: The Himalayan tragedy. Current Science 92: 308–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana N, Sati SP, Sundriyal YP, et al (2007) Socio-economic and environmental implications of the hydroelectric projects in Uttarakhand Himalaya, India. Journal of Mountain Science 4(4): 344–353. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-007-0344-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Räsänen A, Juhola S, Nygren A, et al (2015) Climate change, multiple stressors and human vulnerability–a systematic review (Submitted). Global Environmental Change. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-016-0974-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot J (2014) Cause and response: vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41(5): 667–705. DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2014.894911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rygel L, O’Sullivan D, Yarnal B (2006) A method for constructing a social vulnerability index: An application to hurricane storm surges in a developed country. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11(3): 741–764. DOI: 10.1007/s11027-006-0265-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The Analytical Hierarchial Process. New York: McGrawl-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sati VP (2005) Systems of Agriculture Farming in the Uttranchal. Journal of Mountain Science 2(1): 76–85. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-005-0076-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtlein MC, Shafer JM, Berry M, et al. (2010) Modeled earthquake losses and social vulnerability in Charleston, South Carolina. Applied Geography 31(1): 269–281. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla R, Sachdeva K, Joshi PK (2016) Inherent vulnerability of agricultural communities in Himalaya: A village-level hotspot analysis in the Uttarakhand state of India. Applied Geography 74: 182–198. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh GS, Rao KS, Saxena KG (2015) Energy and economic efficiency of the mountain farming system: A case study in the north-western Himalaya. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 9(2–3): 25–49. DOI: 10.1300/J064v09n02

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Singh JS (1992) Forests of the Himalayas: Structure, Function and Impact of man. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudhakar Reddy C, Dutta K, Jha CS (2013) Analysing the gross and net deforestation rates in India. Current Science 105(11): 1492–1500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate E (2012) Social vulnerability indices: a comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Natural Hazards 63(2): 325–347. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0152-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari PC, Joshi B (2012) Natural and socio-economic factors affecting food security in the Himalayas. Food Security 4(2): 195–207. DOI: 10.1007/s12571-012-0178-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari PC, Joshi B (2015) Local and regional institutions and environmental governance in Hindu Kush Himalaya. Environmental Science and Policy 49: 66–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonmoy FN, El-Zein A, Hinkel J (2014) Assessment of vulnerability to climate change using indicators: A meta-analysis of the literature. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 5(6): 775–792. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.314

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiréhn L, Opach T, Neset T-S (2016) Assessing agricultural vulnerability to climate change in the Nordic countries–an interactive geovisualization approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. pp 1–20. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2016.1143351. Avaliable online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09640568.2016.1143351?journalCode=cjep20 (Assessed on 29 April 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wymann S, Ott C, Klaey A, Stillhardt B (2006) Will International Pursuit of the Millennium Development Goals Alleviate Poverty in Mountains? Mountain Research and Development 26(1): 4–8. DOI: 10.1659/0276-4741(2006)026[0004:WIPOTM]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zebardast E (2013) Constructing a social vulnerability index to earthquake hazards using a hybrid factor analysis and analytic network process (F’ANP) model Natural Hazards 65(3): 1331–1359. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0412-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewers and the editor of the journal for their valuable comments. Authors acknowledge the support of the Ministry of Environment & Forests (MoEF), Government of India (GoI) (Project Serial Number: R&D/NNRMS/2/2013-14).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resources, TERI University, New Delhi, 110070, India

    Roopam Shukla & Kamna Sachdeva

  2. School of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India

    Pawan Kumar Joshi

Authors
  1. Roopam Shukla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kamna Sachdeva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pawan Kumar Joshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roopam Shukla.

Additional information

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-9383

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-1548

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6307-0167

Electronic supplementary material

11629_2016_4058_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

An indicator-based approach to assess village-level social and biophysical vulnerability of agriculture communities in Uttarakhand, India

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shukla, R., Sachdeva, K. & Joshi, P.K. An indicator-based approach to assess village-level social and biophysical vulnerability of agriculture communities in Uttarakhand, India. J. Mt. Sci. 13, 2260–2271 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4058-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4058-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation