Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anti-biofilm effect of glass ionomer cements incorporated with chlorhexidine and bioactive glass

  • Published:
Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed. Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement incorporated with chlorhexidine and bioactive glass on antimicrobial activity and physicochemical properties were investigated. The experimental results showed that groups incorporated with 1% chlorhexidine exhibited a significant reduction of optical density values of the bacterial suspension and increased the degradation of Streptococcus mutans biofilm. However, groups incorporated with 10% bioactive glass did not affect the optical density values and the biofilm formation. The mechanical properties of the materials and the polymerization were not influenced by the addition of chlorhexidine. Nevertheless, the compressive strength was lower when the materials were incorporated with bioactive glass. It can be concluded that glass ionomer cements incorporated with chlorhexidine can maintain its mechanical properties as well as reduce early S mutans biofilm formation. Controlled release/sustained release technology may be required to optimize the antibacterial activity of glass ionomer cements incorporated with bioactive glass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Theilade J. Dental Plaque and Dental Calculus[M]. In: Lindhe J (ed.) Clinical Periodontology, 2nd ed. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 1989: 92–128

  2. Loesche WJ. Role of Streptococcus Mutans in Human Dental Decay[J]. Microbiol Rev., 1986, 50:353–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burke FIT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, Mjor IA. Influence of Patient Factors on Age of Restorations — A Failure and Reasons for their Placement and Replacement[J]. J. Dent., 2001, 29:317–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujii B. The Development of Glass Ionomer Cement[M]. In: Katsuyama S, Ishikawa T, Fujii B, Editors. Glass Ionomer Dental Cement-the Materials and their Clinical Use. Tokyo: Ishiyaku Euro America Inc.;1993:7–14

    Google Scholar 

  5. Imazato S. Bio-active Restorative Materials with Antibacterial Effects: new Dimension of Innovation in Restorative Dentistry[J]. Dent. Mater. J., 2009, 28:11–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Türkün L S, Türkün M, Erturul F, Ateş M and Brugger S. Long-term Antibacterial Effects and Physical Properties of a Chlorhexidine-containing Glass Ionomer Cement[J]. J. Esthet. Restor.Dent., 2008, 20:29–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Charles CH, Mostler KM, Bartels LL, Mankodi SM. Comparative Antiplaque and Antigingivitis Effectiveness of a Chlorhexidine and an Essential Oil Mouthrinse: 6-month Clinical Trial[J]. J. Clin. Periodontol., 2004;31:878–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Xie Z P, Zhang C Q, Yi C Q, Qiu J J, Wang J Q and Zhou J.In Vivo Study Effect of Particulate Bioglass® in the Prevention of Infection in Open Fracture Fixation[J]. J. Biomed Mater. Res. B, Appl. Biomater., 2009, 90:195–201

    Google Scholar 

  9. Allan I, Newman H, Wilson M. Antibacterial Activity of Particulate Bioglass Against Supra- and Subgingival Bacteria[J]. Biomaterials., 2001, 22:168 3–168 7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang D, Munukka E, Hupa L, et al. Factor Controlling Antibacterial Properties of Bioactive Glasses[J]. Key Eng. Mater., 2007, 330–332:173–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Waltimo T, Brunner T J, Vollenweider M, Stark W J and Zehnder M. Antimicrobial Effect of Nanometric Bioactive Glass 45S5[J]. J. Dent. Res., 2007; 86:754–757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Waltimo T, Mohn D, Paqué F, Brunner T J, Stark W J, Imfeld T, Schätzle M, Zehnder M. Fine-tuning of Bioactive Glass for Root Canal disinfection[J]. J. Dent. Res., 2009, 88:235–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu S, Chang J, Liu M and Ning C. Study on Antibacterial Effect of 45S5 Bioglass®[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 2009;20:281–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Young A M. FTIR Investigation of Polymerisation and Polyacid Neutralisation Kinetics in Resin-modified Glass-ionomer Dental Cements[J]. Biomaterials, 2002, 23:328 9–329 5

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Namba N, Yoshida Y, Nagaoka N, Takashima S, Matsuura-Yoshimoto K, Maeda H, Van Meerbeek B, Suzuki K, Takashiba S. Antibacterial Effect of Bactericide Immobilized in Resin Matrix[J]. Dent. Mater., 2009, 25:424–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ribeiro J and Ericson D. In Vitro Antibacterial Effect of Chlorhexidine Added to Glass-ionomer Cements[J]. Scand. J. Dent. Res., 1991, 99:533–540

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Palmer G, Jones F H, Billington R W and Pearson G J. Chlorhexidine Release from an Experimental Glass Ionomer Cement[J]. Biomaterials, 2004, 25:542 3–543 1

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Kaneshiro A V, Ebisu S, Frencken J E, Tay F R. Antibacterial Effects and Physical Properties of Glass-ionomer Cements Containing Chlorhexidine for the ART Approach[J]. Dent. Mater., 2006, 22:647–652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Imazato S. Antibacterial Properties of Resin Composites and Dentin Bonding Systems[J]. Dent. Mater., 2003;19:449–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Palenik CJ, Behnen MJ, Setcos JC, Miller CH. Inhibition of Microbial Adherence and Growth by Various Glass Ionomers in Vitro[J]. Dent. Mater., 1991, 8:16–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Barkhordar RA, Kempler D, Pelzer RRB, Stark MM. Antimicrobial Action of Glass-ionomer Lining Cement on the S Sanguis and S. mutans[J]. Dent. Mater., 1989, 5:281–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Helena Yli-Urpo, Pekka K. Vallittu, Timo O. Närhi, Ari-Pekka Forsback and Marju Väkiparta. Release of Silica, Calcium, Phosphorus, and Fluoride from Glass Ionomer Cement Containing Bioactive Glass[J]. J Biomater. Appl., 2004, 19:5–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gubler M, Brunner T J, Zehnder M, Waltimo T, Sener B and Stark W J. Do Bioactive Glasses Convey a Disinfecting Mechanism Beyond a Mere Increase in pH?[J] Int. Endod. J., 2008, 41:670–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ellakuria J, Triana R, Mínguez N, Soler I, Ibaseta G, Maza J, García-Godoy F. Effect of One-year Water Storage on the Surface Microhardness of Resin-modified Versus Conventional Glass-ionomer Cements[J]. Dent. Mater., 2003, 19:286–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yli-Urpo H, Lassila LV, Närhi T, Vallittu PK. Compressive Strength and Surface Characterization of Glass Ionomer Cements Modified by Particles of Bioactive Glass[J]. Dent. Mater., 2005, 21:201–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Guo J, Pan Q, Huang C, Zhao Y, Ouyang X, Duan S. The Role of Surfactant and Costabilizer in Controlling Size of Nanocapsules Containing TEGDMA in Miniemulsion[J]. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol., 2009, 24: 1 004–1 006

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cui Huang  (黄翠).

Additional information

These authors contributed equally to the work

Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81070852), the Open Research Fund Program of Hubei-MOST KLOS & KLOBME (200903) and the Science and Technology Project of Wuhan(201161038343-02)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, X., Yang, T., Zhao, S. et al. Anti-biofilm effect of glass ionomer cements incorporated with chlorhexidine and bioactive glass. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mat. Sci. Edit. 27, 270–275 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-012-0451-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-012-0451-1

Key words

Navigation