Abstract
Purpose
The gold standard for treatment of ulnar impaction has become ulnar shortening osteotomy. Previous reports in the literature have shown not only good results with relief of ulnar-sided wrist pain but also significant nonunion rates and painful hardware necessitating further surgery and potentially, metal removal. The purpose of this paper is to review the success rate of ulnar shortening osteotomy utilizing a low profile compression plate designed specifically for ulnar shortening osteotomy.
Methods
Ninety-three patients with ulnar abutment syndrome underwent ulnar shortening osteotomy with the low profile osteotomy plate. There were 47 males and 46 females. The Acumed’s ulnar shortening system was utilized in all cases. The patients were evaluated for pain, range of motion, grip strength, return to work, time to union, and hardware removal. The patients’ results were validated using the Mayo Wrist Score.
Results
There was a 100 % union rate in the 93 patients. There were no nonunions or delayed unions, or any hardware removal. All patients noted an improvement in their ulnar-sided wrist pain. Utilizing the Mayo wrist classification, the average postoperative score was 84.5. The average preoperative Mayo score was 49.4, for an average increase of 35.1 points.
Conclusion
The Acumed’s low-contact plate designed specifically for ulnar shortening osteotomy demonstrated 100 % union rate and no implant removal in our series. This is the largest study to our knowledge of a series of ulnar shortening osteotomies and successful healing without the removal of any implants. Furthermore, the specifically designed ulnar shortening osteotomy plate significantly simplifies the procedure for the surgeon and improves patient outcomes with relief of ulnar-sided wrist pain.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baek GH, Chung MS, Lee YH, Gong HS, Lee S, Kim HH. Ulnar shortening osteotomy in idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(12):2649–54.
Boardman MJ, Imbriglia JE. Surgical management of ulnocarpal impaction syndrome. J Hand Surg. 2010;35:640–51.
Chen F, Osterman AL, Mahony K. Smoking and bony union after ulna-shortening osteotomy. Am J Orthop. 2001;30:486–9.
Chun S, Palmer AK. The ulnar impaction syndrome: follow-up of ulnar shortening osteotomy. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1993;18(1):46–53.
Coleman DA, Blair WF, Shurr D. Resection of the radial head for fracture of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:385–92.
Friedman SL, Palmer AK. The ulnar impaction syndrome. Hand Clin. 1991;7:295–310.
Kitzinger H, Karle B, Low S, Krimmer H. Ulnar shortening osteotomy with a premounted sliding-hole plate. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58:636–9.
Luria S, Lauder AJ, Trumble TE. Comparison of ulnar-shortening osteotomy with a new trimed dynamic compression system versus the synthes dynamic compression system: clinical study. J Hand Surg. 2008;33A:1493–7.
Moermans A, Degreef I, DeSmet L. Ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar idiopathic impaction syndrome. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2007;41:310–4.
Palmer AK, Werner FW. Biomechanics of the distal radioulnar joint. Clin Orthop. 1984;187:26–35.
Rayhack JM, Gasser SI, Latta LL, Ouellette EA, Milne EL. Precision oblique osteotomy for shortening of the ulna. J Hand Surg. 1993;18A:908–18.
Tomaino MM, Weiser RW. Combined arthroscopic TFCC debridement and wafer resection of the distal ulna in wrists with triangular fibrocartilage complex tears and positive ulnar variance. J Hand Surg. 2001;26A:1047–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Clark, S.M., Geissler, W.B. Results of ulnar shortening osteotomy with a new plate compression system. HAND 7, 281–285 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-012-9417-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-012-9417-1