Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a leading role in the non-invasive evaluation of bone marrow (BM). Normal BM pattern depends on the ratio and distribution of yellow and red marrow, which are subject to changes with age, pathologies, and treatments. Neonates show almost entirely red marrow. Over time, yellow marrow conversion takes place with a characteristic sequence leading to a red marrow persistence in proximal metaphyses of long bones. In adults, normal BM is composed of both red (40% water, 40% fat) and yellow marrow (15% water, 80% fat). Due to the higher content of fat, yellow marrow normally appears hyperintense on T1-weighted (T1w) fast spin echo (FSE) sequences and hypo-/iso-intense in short tau inversion recovery (STIR) T2-weighted (T2w); red marrow appears slightly hyperintense in T1w FSE and hyper-/iso-intense in STIR T2w. Pathologic BM has reduced fat and increased water percentages, resulting hypointense in T1w FSE and hyperintense in STIR T2w. In oncologic patients, BM MRI signal largely depends on the treatment (irradiation and/or chemotherapy) and its timing. BM fat and water amount and location in normal red/yellow and pathologic marrow are responsible for different signals in MRI sequences whose knowledge by radiologists may help to differentiate between normal and pathologic findings. Our aim was to discuss and illustrate the MRI of BM physiologic conversion and pathologic reconversion occurring in malignancies and after treatments in cancer patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Travlos GS (2006) Normal structure, function, and histology of the bone marrow. Toxicol Pathol 34:548–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926230600939856
Hwang S, Panicek DM (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow in oncology, Part 1. Skeletal Radiol 36:913–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0309-3
Vogler JB, Murphy WA (1988) Bone marrow imaging. Radiology 168:679–693. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.168.3.3043546
Chan BY, Gill KG, Rebsamen SL, Nguyen JC (2016) MR imaging of pediatric bone marrow. RadioGraphics 36:1911–1930. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2016160056
Ricci C, Cova M, Kang YS et al (1990) Normal age-related patterns of cellular and fatty bone marrow distribution in the axial skeleton: MR imaging study. Radiology 177:83–88. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.177.1.2399343
Delfaut EM, Beltran J, Johnson G et al (1999) Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls. RadioGraphics 19:373–382. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.19.2.g99mr03373
Guerini H, Omoumi P, Guichoux F et al (2015) Fat suppression with Dixon techniques in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging: a pictorial review. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 19:335–347. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1565913
Dietrich O, Biffar A, Reiser M, Baur-Melnyk A (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging of bone marrow. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 13:134–144. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1220884
Nouh MR, Eid AF (2015) World Journal of Radiology © 2015. 7:448–459. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v7.i12.448
Daldrup-Link HE, Henning T, Link TM (2007) MR imaging of therapy-induced changes of bone marrow. Eur Radiol 17:743–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0404-1
Ruschke S, Diefenbach MN, Franz D et al (2018) Molecular in vivo imaging of bone marrow adipose tissue. Curr Mol Biol Rep 4:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40610-018-0092-z
Shen W, Chen J, Gantz M et al (2012) MRI-measured pelvic bone marrow adipose tissue is inversely related to DXA-measured bone mineral in younger and older adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 66:983–988. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.35
Yeung DKW, Griffith JF, Antonio GE et al (2005) Osteoporosis is associated with increased marrow fat content and decreased marrow fat unsaturation: a proton MR spectroscopy study. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:279–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20367
Patsch JM, Li X, Baum T et al (2013) Bone marrow fat composition as a novel imaging biomarker in postmenopausal women with prevalent fragility fractures: MARROW FAT COMPOSITION AND FRACTURES. J Bone Miner Res 28:1721–1728. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1950
Karampinos DC, Ruschke S, Dieckmeyer M et al (2018) Quantitative MRI and spectroscopy of bone marrow: quantitative MR of bone marrow. J Magn Reson Imaging 47:332–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25769
Burkhardt R, Kettner G, Böhm W et al (1987) Changes in trabecular bone, hematopoiesis and bone marrow vessels in aplastic anemia, primary osteoporosis, and old age: a comparative histomorphometric study. Bone 8:157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(87)90015-9
Chen W-T, Shih TT-F, Chen R-C et al (2001) Vertebral bone marrow perfusion evaluated with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: significance of aging and sex. Radiology 220:213–218. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl32213
Geith T, Biffar A, Schmidt G et al (2013) Quantitative analysis of acute benign and malignant vertebral body fractures using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Am J Roentgenol 200:W635–W643. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9351
Souza UDO, Oliveira MFD, Heringer LC et al (2018) Sensitivity and specificity of “mini-brain” image pattern to diagnose multiple myeloma and plasmacytoma. Coluna/Columna 17:42–45. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120181701178585
Kessler R, Campbell S, Wang D, Bui-Mansfield L (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow: a review—part II. J Am Osteopath Coll Radiol 1:13–25
An C, Lee YH, Kim S et al (2013) Characteristic MRI findings of spinal metastases from various primary cancers: retrospective study of pathologically-confirmed cases. J Korean Soc Magn Reson Med 17:8. https://doi.org/10.13104/jksmrm.2013.17.1.8
Fayad LM, Kamel IR, Kawamoto S et al (2005) Distinguishing stress fractures from pathologic fractures: a multimodality approach. Skeletal Radiol 34:245–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-004-0872-9
Siegel MJ MRI of bone marrow. In: Semantic Sch. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/69ec/de155073c21602f1ac1c76a18bcf144ba924.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2018
Hwang S, Panicek DM (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow in oncology, Part 2. Skeletal Radiol 36:1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0308-4
Eustace S, Keogh C, Blake M et al (2001) MR imaging of bone oedema: mechanisms and interpretation. Clin Radiol 56:4–12. https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.2000.0585
Baumbach SF, Pfahler V, Bechtold-Dalla Pozza S et al (2020) How we manage bone marrow Edema—an interdisciplinary approach. J Clin Med 9:551. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020551
Byerly D, Bui-Mansfield LT (2018) Patterns of bone marrow Edema on MRI: clues to underlying pathology. Contemp Diagn Radiol 41:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CDR.0000530851.45419.a8
van Vucht N, Santiago R, Lottmann B et al (2019) The Dixon technique for MRI of the bone marrow. Skeletal Radiol 48:1861–1874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03271-4
Wang DT (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow: a review—part I. J Am Osteopath Coll Radiol 1:2–12
Małkiewicz A, Dziedzic M (2012) Rekonwersja szpiku—obrazowanie fizjologicznych zmian szpiku w codziennej praktyce. Pol J Radiol 77:45–50. https://doi.org/10.12659/PJR.883628
Acknowledgements
Pictures have been developed with the collaboration of Simone Caposano.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors were involved in patient management and wrote and/or reviewed the report. The electronic poster entitled “C-2445—Bone Marrow: is it normal? Physiologic and pathologic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings” has been presented in the Electronic Poster Online System (EPOS™) of the European Society of Radiology and within the scientific and educational programme at the European Congress of Radiology 2019, held on 27 February–3 March 2019, in Vienna, Austria. The poster is available at epos.myESR.org and can be cited through its unique https://doi.org/10.26044/ecr2019/c-2445.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chiarilli, M.G., Delli Pizzi, A., Mastrodicasa, D. et al. Bone marrow magnetic resonance imaging: physiologic and pathologic findings that radiologist should know. Radiol med 126, 264–276 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01239-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01239-2