Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simulating Eco-evolutionary Processes in an Obligate Pollination Model with a Genetic Algorithm

  • Special Issue: Modelling Biological Evolution: Developing Novel Approaches
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pollination interactions are common, and their maintenance is critical for many food crops upon which human populations depend. Pollination is a mutualism interaction; together with predation and competition, mutualism makes up the triumvirate of fundamental interactions that control population dynamics. Here we examine pollination interactions (nectar reward for gamete transport service) using a simple heuristic model similar to the Lotka–Volterra models that have underpinned our understanding of predation and competition so effectively since the 1920s. We use a genetic algorithm to simulate the eco-evolutionary interactions of the plant and pollinator populations and examine the distributions of the parameter values and zero isoclines to infer the relative ubiquity of the various eco-evolutionary outcomes possible in the model. Our results suggest that trade-offs between costs and benefits for the pollinator may be a key component of obligate pollination systems in achieving adaptive success creating and stably occupying mutualist niches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allee WC, Bowen ES (1932) Studies in animal aggregations: mass protection against colloidal silver among goldfishes. J Exp Biol 61:185–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Bascompte J, Jordano P, Melia CJ, Olesen JM (2003) The nested assembly of plant? Animal mutualistic networks. PNAS 100(16):9383–9387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bascompte J, Jordano P, Olesen JM (2006) Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312:431–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher DH (1985) The biology of mutualism. Croom Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein JL (2015) Mutualism. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cropp RA, Norbury J (2015) Population interactions in ecology: a rule-based approach to modelling ecosystems in a mass-conserving framework. SIAM Rev 57:437–465

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean AM (1983) A simple model of mutualism. Am Nat 121:409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis DL (1980) Energy flow, nutrient cycling and ecosystem resilience. Ecology 61:764–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Mazancourt C, Loreau M, Dieckmann U (2001) Can the evolution of plant defense lead to plant-herbivore mutualism. Am Nat 158(2):109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois DM (1998) Emergence of chaos in evolving Volterra ecosystems. In: Van de Vijver G, Salthe SN, Delpos M (eds) Evolutionary systems: biological and epistomological perspectives on selection and self-organisation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 197–215

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graves WG, Peckham B, Pastor J (2006) A bifurcation analysis of a differential equations model for mutualism. Bull Math Biol 68:1851–1872

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbour

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JN, DeAngelis DL (2010) A consumer-resource approach to the density-dependent population dynamics of mutualism. Ecology 91:1286–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen SE, Mejer HF (1983) Trends in ecological modelling. In: Lauenroth WK, Skogerboe GV, Flug M (eds) Analysis of ecological systems: state-of-the-art in ecological modelling. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 21–26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levin S (2012) The Princeton guide to ecology. Princeton University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotka AJ (1925) Elements of physical biology. Wilkins and Kilkins, Baltimore

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH (1970) Species packing and competitive equilibria for many species. Theor Popul Biol 1:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1981) Theoretical ecology: principles and applications. Blackwell, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell M (1997) An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Molles M (2014) Ecology: concepts and applications. McGraw-Hill Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray JD (2001) Mathematical biology. Interdisciplinary applied mathematics, vol 17. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE, Relyea R (2014) Ecology: the economy of nature. W.H. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockwood LL (2015) Introduction to population ecology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu A, Dohzono I, Nakaji M, Roff DA, Miller D, Osata S, Yajima T, Niitsu S, Utsugi N, Sugawara T, Yoshinura J (2013) Fine-tuned bee-flower coevolutionary state hidden within multiple pollination interactions. Sci Rep 4:3988. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meer JH, Goldberg DE (2013) Population ecology: first principles. Princeton University Press, Woodstock

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Matson PA (2012) Nutrient cycling and biogeochemistry. In: Levin S (ed) The Princeton guide to ecology. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, pp 330–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Volterra V (1926) Variations and fluctuations of the numbers of individuals in animal species living together. In: Chapman RN (ed) Reprinted in 1931 in Chapman RN (ed) Animal Ecology. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson RA, Szathmary E (2016) How can evolution learn? Trends Ecol Evol 131:147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmer P (2011) Pollination and floral ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zahran HH (1999) Rhizobium–Legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under severe conditions and in an arid climate. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63(4):968–989

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Andrew Morozov and the organisers of the organisers of the Modelling Biological Evolution 2017: Developing Novel Approaches International Conference held at the University of Leicester in April 2017. Funding was provided by Mathematical Institute University of Oxford, Lincoln College, University of Oxford and St. Hilda’s College, University of Oxford.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger Cropp.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 1127 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cropp, R., Norbury, J. Simulating Eco-evolutionary Processes in an Obligate Pollination Model with a Genetic Algorithm. Bull Math Biol 81, 4803–4820 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-018-0508-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-018-0508-1

Keywords

Navigation