Abstract
We suggest an explanation of typical incubation times statistical features based on the universal behavior of exit times for diffusion models. We give a mathematically rigorous proof of the characteristic right skewness of the incubation time distribution for very general one-dimensional diffusion models. Imposing natural simple conditions on the drift coefficient, we also study these diffusion models under the assumption of noise smallness and show that the limiting exit time distributions in the limit of vanishing noise are Gaussian and Gumbel. Thus, they match the existing data as well as the other existing models do. The character of our models, however, allows us to argue that the features of the exit time distributions that we describe are universal and manifest themselves in various other situations where the times involved can be described as detection or halting times, for example response times studied in psychology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almada S, Bakhtin Y (2011) Scaling limit for the diffusion exit problem in the Levinson case. Stoch Process Appl 121(1):24–37
Bakhtin Y (2008) Exit asymptotics for small diffusion about an unstable equilibrium. Stoch Process Appl 118(5):839–851
Bakhtin Y (2010) Small noise limit for diffusions near heteroclinic networks. Dyn Syst 25(3):413–431
Bakhtin Y (2011) Noisy heteroclinic networks. Probab Theory Relat Fields 150:1–42
Bakhtin Y (2012) Decision making times in mean-field dynamic Ising model. Ann Henri Poincaré 13(5):1291–1303
Bakhtin Y (2013) Gumbel distribution in exit problems. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1307.7060 [PR]
Bakhtin Y (2015) On Gumbel limit for the length of reactive paths. Stoch Dyn 15(01):1550001
Bakhtin Y, Correll J (2012) A neural computation model for decision-making times. J Math Psychol 56(5):333–340
Bakhtin Y, Święch A (2016) Scaling limits for conditional diffusion exit problems and asymptotics for nonlinear elliptic equations. Trans Am Math Soc 368(9):6487–6517
Berglund N (2016) Noise-induced phase slips, log-periodic oscillations, and the Gumbel distribution. Markov Process Relat Fields 22(3):467–505
Cérou F, Guyader A, Leliévre T, Malrieu F (2013) On the length of one-dimensional reactive paths. ALEA Lat Am J Probab Math Stat 10(1):359–389
Cox DR, Miller HD (1965) The theory of stochastic processes. Wiley, New York
Day MV (1990) Some phenomena of the characteristic boundary exit problem. In: Diffusion processes and related problems in analysis, Vol. I (Evanston, IL, 1989), volume 22 of Progress Probability. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, pp 55–71
Deift P, Trogdon T (2017) Universality for eigenvalue algorithms on sample covariance matrices. SIAM J Numer Anal 55(6):2835–2862
Deift P, Trogdon T (2018) Universality for the toda algorithm to compute the eigenvalues of a random matrix. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21715
Deift PA, Menon G, Olver S, Trogdon T (2014) Universality in numerical computations with random data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(42):14973–14978
Eizenberg A (1984) The exit distributions for small random perturbations of dynamical systems with a repulsive type stationary point. Stochastics 12(3–4):251–275
Ethier SN, Kurtz TG (1986) Markov processes. Characterization and convergence. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics: probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York
Faye O, Bolle P-Y, Heleze E, Faye O, Loucoubar C, Magassouba N, Soropogui B, Keita S, Gakou T, Ibrahima Bah EH, Koivogui L, Sall AA, Cauchemez S (2015) Chains of transmission and control of ebola virus disease in conakry, guinea, in 2014: an observational study. Lancet Infect Dis 15(3):320–326
Freidlin MI, Wentzell AD (2012) Random perturbations of dynamical systems. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer, Berlin
Goldblatt MW (1949) Vesical tumours induced by chemical compounds. Occup. Environ. Med. 6(2):65–81
Karlin S, Taylor HM (1981) A second course in stochastic processes. Academic Press Inc., New York
Luce RD (1991) Response times: their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Ottino-Löffler B, Scott JG, Strogatz SH (2017a) Evolutionary dynamics of incubation periods. eLife 6:e30212. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30212
Ottino-Löffler B, Scott JG, Strogatz SH (2017b) Takeover times for a simple model of network infection. Phys Rev E 96:012313
Pfrang CW, Deift P, Menon G (2014) How long does it take to compute the eigenvalues of a random symmetric matrix? In: Random matrix theory, interacting particle systems, and integrable systems, volume 65 of Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 411–442
Reich N, Lessler J, Varma J, Vora N (2018) Reducing the threat of imported infectious disease outbreaks with active monitoring. https://github.com/reichlab/activemonitr/tree/master/inst/raw-data. Accessed 23 Oct 2018
Sagun L, Trogdon T, LeCun Y (2018) Universal halting times in optimization and machine learning. Quart Appl Math 76:289–301
Sartwell PE (1950) The distribution of incubation periods of infectious disease1. Am J Epidemiol 51(3):310–318
Schrödinger E (1915) Zur Theorie der Fall-und Steigversuche an Teilchen mit Brownscher Bewegung. Physikalische Zeitschrift 16:289–295
Shiryaev AN (1996) Probability, volume 95 of graduate texts in mathematics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (Translated from the first (1980) Russian edition by R. P. Boas)
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful to Charles Peskin and Percy Deift for bringing Ottino-Löffler et al. (2017a) to his attention. He also thanks them for stimulating discussions and encouragement.
Funding
Funding was provided by National Science Foundation (Grant No. DMS-1811444).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bakhtin, Y. Universal Statistics of Incubation Periods and Other Detection Times via Diffusion Models. Bull Math Biol 81, 1070–1088 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-018-00558-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-018-00558-w