Skip to main content
Log in

Directional Hydrodynamic Sensing by Free-Swimming Organisms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many aquatic organisms detect the presence of moving objects in their environment, such as predators, by sensing the hydrodynamic disturbances the movements produce. The resultant water flow is readily detectable by stationary organisms, but free-swimming organisms are carried with the surrounding water and may not detect the bulk surrounding flow, which limits the available information about the source. We have developed a theory that clarifies what information is contained in disturbances generated by an attacking predator that is available to a free-swimming organism and might be extracted from local flow deformations alone. The theory shows that, depending on how well the deformations can be measured in space and time, an organism can reduce the range of possible locations, speeds, sizes, and arrival times of the predator. We apply the theory to planktonic copepods that have mechanosensory hairs along a pair of antennules. The study reveals the presence of “blind spots,” potential ambiguities in resolving from which of two sides a predator attacks, and whether it generates a bow wave or suction. Our findings lead to specific testable hypotheses concerning optimal escape strategies, which are helpful for interpreting the behavior of evasive prey and designing free-swimming robots with sensory capabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acheson D (1990) Elementary fluid dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ball E, Cowan A (1977) Ultrastructure of the antennal sensilla of Acetes (crustacea, decapoda, natantia, sergestidae). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 277(957):429–457

  • Bleckmann H (2008) Peripheral and central processing of lateral line information. J Comp Physiol A 194(2):145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleckmann H, Breithaupt T, Blickhan R, Tautz J (1991) The time course and frequency content of hydrodynamic events caused by moving fish, frogs and crustaceans. J Comp Physiol 168:749–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Breithaupt T, Tautz J (1990) The sensitivity of crayfish mechanoreceptors to hydrodynamic and acoustic stimuli. In: Wiese K, Krenz WD, Tautz J, Reichert H, Mulloney B (eds) Frontiers in crustacean neurobiology. Advances in life sciences. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 114–120

  • Burdick D, Hartline D, Lenz P (2007) Escape strategies in co-occurring calanoid copepods. Limnol Oceanogr 52(6):2373–2385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buskey E, Lenz P, Hartline D (2002) Escape behavior of planktonic copepods in response to hydrodynamic disturbances: high speed video analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 235:135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buskey E, Strickler J, Bradley C, Hartline D, Lenz P (2017) Escapes in copepods: comparison between myelinate and amyelinate species. J Exp Biol 220:754–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas J, Dangles O (2010) Physical ecology of fluid flow sensing in arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 55:505–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs S, Conley R (1997) Dipole source location in the mottled sculpin II. The role of lateral line excitation patterns. J Comp Physiol A 180:401–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ćurčić-Blake B, van Netten S (2006) Source location encoding in the fish lateral line canal. J Exp Biol 209(8):1548–1559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devarakonda R, Barth F, Humphrey J (1996) Dynamics of arthropod filiform hairs. IV. Hair motion in air and water. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 351:933–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill C, Crisp D (1985) Sensitivity of intact and antennule amputated copepods to water disturbance. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 21:221–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulet J, Engelmann J, Chagnaud B, Franosch J, Suttner M, Van Hemmen J (2008) Object localization through the lateral line system of fish: theory and experiment. J Comp Physiol A 194(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanke W, Bleckmann H, Brucker C (2000) The ageing of the low-frequency water disturbances caused by swimming goldfish and its possible relevance to prey detection. J Exp Biol 203:1193–1200

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartline D, Lenz P, Herren C (1996) Physiological and behavioral studies of escape responses in calanoid copepods. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 27(2–3):199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haury L, Kenyon D, Brooks J (1980) Experimental evaluation of the avoidance reaction of Calanus finmarchicus. J Plankton Res 2(3):187–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasumyan A (2003) The lateral line in fish: structure, function, and role in behavior. J Ichthyol 43(2):S175–S213

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiørboe T (2013) Predator and prey perception in copepods due to hydromechanical signals. Integr Comp Biol 53:821–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiørboe T, Visser A (1999) Predator and prey perception in copepods due to hydromechanical signals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 179:81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiørboe T, Saiz E, Visser A (1999) Hydrodynamic signal perception in the copepod Acartia tonsa. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 179:97–111

  • Lenz P, Hartline D (2014) Mechanoreception in crustaceans of the pelagic realm. In: Derby C, Thiel M (eds) Nervous systems and control of behavior, vol 3. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 293–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz P, Yen J (1993) Distal setal mechanoreceptors of the first antennae of marine copepods. Bull Mar Sci 53(1):170–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxey MR, Riley JJ (1983) Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in a nonuniform flow. Phys Fluids 26(4):883–889

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mellon D (2014) Sensory systems of crustaceans. In: Derby C, Thiel M (eds) Nervous systems and control of behavior, vol 3. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 49–84

  • Park T (1966) The biology of a calanoid copepod: Epilabidocera amphitrites McMurrich. Cellule 66:129–251

  • Stewart W, Nair A, Jiang H, McHenry M (2014) Prey fish escape by sensing the bow wave of a predator. J Exp Biol 217(24):4328–4336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strickler J, Bal A (1973) Setae of the first antennae of the copepod Cyclops scutifer (Sars): their structure and importance. Proc Natl Acad Sci 70(9):2656–2659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao J, Yu X (2012) Hair flow sensors: from bio-inspiration to bio-mimicking? A review. Smart Mater Struct 21(11):113,001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantafyllou M, Weymouth G, Miao J (2016) Biomimetic survival hydrodynamics and flow sensing. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 48:1–24

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • vanDuren L, Stamhuis E, Videler J (1998) Reading the copepod personal ads: increasing encounter probability with hydromechanical signals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 353:691–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser A (2001) Hydromechanical signals in the plankton. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 222:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel HD, Bleckmann (2000) Behavioral discrimination of water motions caused by moving objects. J Comp Physiol A 186:1107–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherby T, Lenz P (2000) Mechanoreceptors in calanoid copepods: designed for high sensitivity. Arthropod Struct Dev 29(4):275–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiese K (1974) The mechanoreceptive system of prey localization in Notonecta. II. The principle of prey localization. J Comp Physiol A 92:317–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wubbels R, Schellart N (1997) Neuronal encoding of sound direction in the auditory midbrain of the rainbow trout. J Neurophysiol 77(6):3060–3074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaji I (1976) Illustrations of the marine plankton of Japan. Hoikusha, Osaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen J, Lenz P, Gassie D, Hartline D (1992) Mechanoreception in marine copepods: electrophysiological studies on the first antennae. J Plankton Res 14(4):495–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yen J, Murphy D, Fan L, Webster D (2015) Sensory-motor systems of copepods involved in their escape from suction feeding. Integr Comp Biol 55:121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York C, Bartol I (2014) Lateral line analogue aids vision in successful predator evasion for the brief squid, Lolliguncula brevis. J Exp Biol 217(14):2437–2439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young S, Dedwylder R, Friesen W (1981) Responses of the medicinal leech to water waves. J Comp Physiol A 144(1):111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Petra Lenz and Ann Castelfranco for valuable discussions and critical reading of an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daisuke Takagi.

Additional information

We acknowledge support by US ARO Grant W911NF-15-1-0608 awarded from Dr. Virginia Pasour to DT and NSF Grants CBET-1603929 to DT and OCE-1235549 to P. Lenz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takagi, D., Hartline, D.K. Directional Hydrodynamic Sensing by Free-Swimming Organisms. Bull Math Biol 80, 215–227 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-017-0368-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-017-0368-0

Keywords

Navigation