Abstract
In addition to the memorization, algorithmic skills and vocabulary which are the default focus in many mathematics classrooms, professional mathematicians are expected to creatively apply known techniques, construct new mathematical approaches and communicate with and about mathematics. We propose that students can learn these professional, higher-level skills through Laboratory Experiences in Mathematical Biology which put students in the role of mathematics researcher creating mathematics to describe and understand biological data. Here we introduce a laboratory experience centered on yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) growing in a small capped flask with a jar to collect carbon dioxide created during yeast growth and respiration. The lab requires no specialized equipment and can easily be run in the context of a college math class. Students collect data and develop mathematical models to explain the data. To help place instructors in the role of mentor/collaborator (as opposed to jury/judge), we facilitate the lab using model competition judged via Bayesian Information Criterion. This article includes details about the class activity conducted, student examples and pedagogical strategies for success.
References
Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19(6):716–723
Akaike H (1981) Likelihood of a model and information criteria. J Econom 16(1):3–14
Blum W, Niss M (1991) Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects? State, trends and issues in mathematics instruction. Educ Stud Math 22(1):37–68
Blum W, Ferri RB (2009) Mathematical modelling: Can it be taught and learnt? J Math Model Appl 1(1):45–58
Blum W, Galbraith PL, Henn H-W, Niss M (eds) (2007) Modelling and applications in mathematics education: the 14th ICMI study. Springer, New York
Bruder A, Kohler BR (2016) Coffee to go! Data collection and mathematical models in multivariable calculus, problems, resources, and issues in mathematics undergraduate studies (under review)
Casner-Lotto J Barrington L (2006) Are they really ready to work? Employers’ perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st Century US Workforce. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. 1 Massachusetts Avenue NW Suite 700, Washington
Cavanaugh JE, Neath AA (1999) Generalizing the derivation of the Schwarz information criterion. Commun Stat Theory Methods 28(1):49–66
Clayton M (1998) Industrial applied mathematics is changing as technology advances. In: Hoyles C, Morgan C, Woodhouse G (eds) Rethinking the mathematics curriculum. Falmer, London, pp 22–28
Feldmann H (ed) (2012) Introduction, in yeast: molecular and cell biology, 2nd edn. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. doi:10.1002/9783527659180.ch1
Feser J, Vasaly H, Herrera J (2013) On the edge of mathematics and biology integration: improving quantitative skills in undergraduate biology education. CBE-Life Sci Educ 12(2):124–128
Fisher RA (1925) Theory of statistical estimation. In: Mathematical proceedings of the Cambridge philosophical society, vol 22, no 05. Cambridge University Press, pp 700–725
Gause GF (1934) The struggle for existence. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
Haughton DM (1988) On the choice of a model to fit data from an exponential family. Ann Stat 16(1):342–355
Hilborn R, Mangel M (1997) The ecological detective: confronting models with data, vol 28. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Kaiser G, Sriraman B (2006) A global survey of international perspectives on modelling in mathematics education. ZDM 38(3):302–310
Kashyap RL (1982) Optimal choice of AR and MA parts in autoregressive moving average models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2:99–104
Knowles JR (1980) Enzyme-catalyzed phosphoryl transfer reactions. Ann Rev Biochem 49:877–919
Kohler BR, Swank RJ, Haefner JW, Powell JA (2010) Leading students to investigate diffusion as a model of brine shrimp movement. Bull Math Biol 72(1):230–257
Labaree DF (1997) Public goods, private goods: the American struggle over educational goals. Am Educ Res J 34(1):39–81
Leonard T (1982) Discussion of “A simple predictive density function” by Lejeune and Faulkenberry. J Am Stat Assoc 77:657–658
Lewis M, Powell JA (2016) Modeling zombie outbreaks: a problem-based approach to improving mathematics one brain at a time. PRIMUS 26(7):705–726
Parnas DL (1996) Education for computing professionals. IEEE Computer, vol 23, pp 17–22
Powell JA, Kohler BR, Haefner JW, Bodily J (2012) Carrying biomath education in a leaky bucket. Bull Math Biol 74:2232–2264
Powell JA, Cangelosi JS, Harris AM (1998) Games to teach mathematical modelling. SIAM Rev 40(1):87–95
Resnick LB (1987) The 1987 presidential address: learning in school and out. Educ Res 16:13–54
Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2):461–464
Stone M (1979) Comments on model selection criteria of Akaike and Schwarz. J R Stat Soc. B 41:276–278
Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists (2003). Board on life sciences, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies. National Academies Press, Washington
Trelinski G (1983) Spontaneous mathematization of situations outside mathematics. Educ Stud Math 14(3):275–284
Usiskin Z (1991) Building mathematics curricula with applications and modeling. In: Niss M, Bloom W, Huntley I (eds) Teaching of mathematical modelling and applications. Horwood, London, pp 30–45
Verhulst P-F (1838) Notice sur la loi que la population poursuit dans son accroissement. Correspondance Mathématique et Physique 10:113–121
Yerushalmy M (1997) Mathematizing verbal descriptions of situations: a language to support modeling. Cognit Instr 15(2):207–264
Zbiek RM, Conner A (2006) Beyond motivation: exploring mathematical modeling as a context for deepening students’ understandings of curricular mathematics. Educ Stud Math 63(1):89–112
Acknowledgements
The authors received support from the NSF through a TUES Phase I Grant (NSF 1245421). We also wish to thank Brynja Kohler, Andrea Bruder and Miro Kummel for helpful discussions and deeply appreciate feedback from 2 anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lewis, M., Powell, J. Yeast for Mathematicians: A Ferment of Discovery and Model Competition to Describe Data. Bull Math Biol 79, 356–382 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-016-0236-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-016-0236-3