Abstract
Recent experiments indicate that uniformly compressing a cancer mass at its surface tends to transform many of its cells from proliferative to functional forms. Cancer cells suffer from the Warburg effect, resulting from depleted levels of cell membrane potentials. We show that the compression results in added free energy and that some of the added energy contributes distortional pressure to the cells. This excites the piezoelectric effect on the cell membranes, in particular raising the potentials on the membranes of cancer cells from their depleted levels to near-normal levels. In a sample calculation, a gain of 150 mV in is so attained. This allows the Warburg effect to be reversed. The result is at least partially regained function and accompanying increased molecular order. The transformation remains even when the pressure is turned off, suggesting a change of phase; these possibilities are briefly discussed. It is found that if the pressure is, in particular, applied adiabatically the process obeys the second law of thermodynamics, further validating the theoretical model.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In fact all statistically repeatable natural systems, whether living or inanimate, obey maximum Fisher information and order. See proof in (Frieden and Gatenby 2013b)
References
Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P (2002) Molecular biology of the cell, 4th edn. Garland Science, N.Y.
Altman GH, Horan RL, Farhadi J, Stark PR, Volloch V, Richmond JC, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Kaplan DL (2002) Cell differentiation by mechanical stress. FASEB J 16:270
Aranovich LY, Newton RC (1996) \(\text{ H }_{2}\text{ O }\) activity in concentrated NaCl solutions at high pressures and temperatures measured by the brucite-periclase equilibrium. Contrib Miner Petrol 125:200
Athenstaedt H (1974) Permanent electric polarization and pyroelectric behaviour of vertebrates. Ann NY Acad Sci 238:68–94
Binggeli R, Cameron IL (1980) Cellular potentials of normal and cancerous fibroblasts and hepatocytes. Cancer Res 40:1830–1835
Binney J, Skinner D (2008) The physics of quantum mechanics, Cappella Archive 2008; revised printings 2009, 2010, 2011 (book also on web), see pgs 246–248.
Cheng G, Tse J, Jain RK, Munn LL (2009) Micro-environmental mechanical stress controls tumor spheroid size and morphology by suppressing proliferation and inducing apoptosis in cancer cells. PLoS One 4:e4632. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004632
Colwell LJ, Brenner MP, Ribbeck K (2010) Charge as a selection criterion for translocation through the nuclear pore complex. PLoS Comput Biol 6:e1000747. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000747
Craig D, Schaubert K, Shiratsuchi H, Kan-Mitchell J, Basson M (2008) Increased pressure stimulates aberrant dendritic cell maturation. Cell Mol Biol Lett 13:260
Davies PCW, Demetrius L, Tuszynski JA (2011) Cancer as a dynamical phase transition, Theor Biol Med Model, http://www.tbiomed.com/content/8/1/30
Frank SA (2009) Natural selection maximizes Fisher information. J Evol Biol 22:231
Frieden BR, Gatenby RA (2011a) Order in a multidimensional system. Phys Rev E 84:011128
Frieden BR, Gatenby RA (2011b) Information dynamics in living systems: prokaryotes, eukaryotes, and cancer. PLoS One 6:e22085. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022085
Frieden BR, Gatenby RA (2013a) Cell development obeys maximum Fisher information. Front Biosci E5:1017
Frieden BR, Gatenby RA (2013b) Principle of maximum Fisher information from Hardy’s axioms applied to statistical systems. Phys Rev E 88:042144, or at arXiv:1405.0007v1 [physics.gen-ph].
Frieden BR, Hawkins RJ (2010) Quantifying system order for full and partial coarse graining. Phys Rev E 82:066117
Fukada E (1982) Electrical phenomena in biorheology. Biorheology 19:15–27
Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ (2004) Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat Rev Cancer 4:891
Gonzalez MJ, Miranda Massari JR, Duconge J, Riordan NH, Ichim T, Quintero-Del-Rio AI, Ortiz N (2012) Bioenergetic theory of carcinogenesis. Med Hypotheses 79:433
Gronlien HK, Stock C, Aihara MS, Allen RD, Naitoh Y (2002) Relationship between the membrane potential of the contractile vacuole complex and its osmoregulatory activity in Paramecium multimicronucleatum. J Exp Biol 205:3261
Hatzikirou H, Brusch L, Schaller C, Simon M, Deutsch A (2010) Prediction of traveling front behavior in a lattice-gas cellular automaton model for tumor invasion. J Comput Math Appl 59:2326
Jakli A, Harden J, Notz C, Bailey C (2007) Piezoelectricity of phospholipids: a possible mechanism for mechano-, and magneto-receptions in biology. Electron Liq Cryst Commun, pp. 1–8. http://www.e-lc.org/docs/2007_04_09_12_01_56
Kamkin A, Kiseleva I (eds) (2005) Mechanosensitivity in cells and tissues. Academia, Moscow, ISBN-10: 5–7695-2590-8.
Kiener HP, Stipp CS, Allen PG, Higgins JMG, Brenner MB (2006) Cadherin-11 promotes invasive behavior of fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Mol Biol Cell 16:2366
Lee IC, Wang JH, Lee YT, Young TH (2007) The differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by mechanical stress or/and co-culture system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 352:147
Liao Z, Popel AS, Brownell WE, Spector AS (2005) Effect of voltage-dependent membrane properties on active force generation in cochlear outer hair cell. J Acoust Soc Am 118:3737–3746
Lobikin M, Levin M (2014) Endogenous bioelectric cues as morphogenetic signals in vivo, chapter 15. In: Fels D, Cifra M (eds) The fields of cells, (in press).
Mannick J, Driessen R, Gralajda P, Keymer JE, Dekker C (2009) Bacterial growth and motility in sub-micron constrictions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:14861
McKinnell RG, Deggins BA, Labat DD (1969) Transplantation of pluripotential nuclei from triploid frog tumors. Science 165(891):394–396
Milosavljevic N, Duranton C, Djerbi N et al (2010) Nongenomic effects of cisplatin: acute inhibition of mechanosensitive transporters and channels without actin remodeling. Cancer Res 70:7514. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1253.Epub
Newman J (2008) Physics of the life sciences (book on the web). Springer, N.Y.
Ribbeck K Gorlich D (2001) Kinetic analysis of translocation through nuclear pore complexes. EMBO J 20:1320–1330
Sataric MV, Pokorny J, Fiala J, Zakula RB, Zekovic S (1996) Microtubules in interactions with endogenous d.c. and a.c. fields in living cells. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 41:53
Schwalbe JT, Vlahovska PM, Miksis MJ (2010) Lipid membrane instability and poration driven by capacitive charging. arXiv:1005.0403v1 [physics.bio-ph] 3 May 2010.
Shamos MH, Lavine LS (1967) Piezoelectricity as a fundamental property of biological tissues. Nature 213:267
Shekar NVC, Rajan KG (2001) Kinetics of pressure induced structural phase transitions—A review. Bull Mater Sci 24:1
Sherwood L (2010) Human physiology: from cells to systems. Brooks/Cole, Belmont
Spector AA (2003) Modeling a piezoelectric biological membrane. In: Bathe KJ (ed) Proceedings of the second MIT conference on computational fluid and solid mechanics. Elsevier, Oxford
Sundelacruz S, Li C, Choi YJ, Levin M, Kaplan DL (2013) Bioelectric modulation of wound healing in a 3D in vitro model of tissue-engineered bone. Biomaterials 34:6695
Venugopalan M (2012) Applying compression to breast cancer cells growing within a three-dimensional extracellular matrix causes them to revert to a normal phenotype. 2012 Annual meeting of the American Society for Cell Biology, San Francisco.
Wang J, Thampathy B, Lin J, Im H (2007) Mechanoregulation of gene expression in fibroblasts. Gene 391:1–15
Warburg O (1930) The metabolism of tumours. Arnold Constable, London
Yang S (2012) To revert breast cancer cells, give them the squeeze. Media Relations, UC Berkeley News Center, Berkeley, California
Yang M, Brackenbury WJ (2013) Membrane potential and cancer progression. Front Physiol 4. doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00185
Yoshida K, Morita T (2004) Control of radiosensitivity of F9 mouse teratocarcinoma cells by regulation of histone H2AX gene expression using a tetracycline turn-off system. Cancer Res 64:4131
Zheng J, Ito Y, Imanishi Y (1995) Cell growth on insulin/RGDS-coimmobilized polymethyl methacrylate films. Biotechnol Prog 11:677
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge support from the National Cancer Institute under grant 1U54CA143970-01.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Sufficiency of and Conditions for Applying the Pressure Adiabatically
Appendix: Sufficiency of and Conditions for Applying the Pressure Adiabatically
An increase in cell functional order has been predicted by the model process of Sect. 3. However, to be physically valid, it must obey the second law of thermodynamics. We show that this is obeyed if the pressure increase is adiabatic, i.e., transferred as purely the work \(\Delta W\) assumed in Eq. (1). Thus, it must occur quickly enough that no heat exchange occurs. Other system constraints are also required, as enumerated. We emphasize that this is only a proof of sufficiency; other, slower pressure increases might suffice to obey the second law as well.
Consider one such cell. In being alive, it is in a generally non-equilibrium state. Only a dead cell has an entropy \(S=\hbox {max}\). so that here \(S\ne \hbox {max}\). How does the applied pressure affect the entropic system state of the cell? In general, adiabatic pressure leaves all probability states \(p_{j}\), \(j = 1,\ldots \) of the cell invariant (Binney and Skinner 2008). This leaves its entropy \(S \equiv -k\sum _{j} p_{{j}}\) ln \(p_{{j}}\) invariant as well, obeying \(\Delta S=0\). (k is the Boltzmann constant.) This verifies that the second law of thermodynamics is obeyed by the cell compression process. It also allows the \(p_{{j}}\) to remain in their original non-equilibrium state, i.e., representing a living cell.
Essential to the adiabatic approximation is that all cells are isolated from any heat flow (Sect. 6.3), and move as an ideal fluid (Binney and Skinner 2008). Such isolation from heat flow avoids particle collisions and resulting changes in states \(p_{j}\) of each cell (leaving entropy change \(\Delta S=0\) as required). Thus, the cells of the fluid system are assumed, as an approximation, to not collide but, rather, to flow independently. Such a fluid is the simplest non-trivial thermodynamic system (Binney and Skinner 2008). Also, under adiabatic pressure \(P\), the system is compressed so quickly that no heat is transferred either to or from it.
Such fluid flow is accomplished by keeping the cells, and the medium they are in, at the same temperature (Sect. 6.3). Such heat isolation avoids the dissipatory effects of coarse graining (Frieden and Hawkins 2010) and, so, is essential to allowing the level of order to be maximal. Such maximization helps in reversing the cancer evolution back toward a state of function (Sects. 3.3 and 5.2).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frieden, B.R., Gatenby, R.A. Cancer Suppression by Compression. Bull Math Biol 77, 71–82 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-014-0051-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-014-0051-7