Skip to main content
Log in

Preventing the Tragedy of the Commons Through Punishment of Over-Consumers and Encouragement of Under-Consumers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conditions that can lead to the exploitative depletion of a shared resource, i.e., the tragedy of the commons, can be reformulated as a game of prisoner’s dilemma: while preserving the common resource is in the best interest of the group, over-consumption is in the interest of each particular individual at any given point in time. One way to try and prevent the tragedy of the commons is through infliction of punishment for over-consumption and/or encouraging under-consumption, thus selecting against over-consumers. Here, the effectiveness of various punishment functions in an evolving consumer-resource system is evaluated within a framework of a parametrically heterogeneous system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Conditions leading to the possibility of sustainable coexistence with the common resource for a subset of cases are identified analytically using adaptive dynamics; the effects of punishment on heterogeneous populations with different initial composition are evaluated using the reduction theorem for replicator equations. Obtained results suggest that one cannot prevent the tragedy of the commons through rewarding of under-consumers alone—there must also be an implementation of some degree of punishment that increases in a nonlinear fashion with respect to over-consumption and which may vary depending on the initial distribution of clones in the population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Geritz, S. A. H., Kisdi, E., Meszéna, G., & Metz, J. A. J. (1997). Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol., 12(1), 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorban, A. N. (1984). Equilibrium encircling. Equations of chemical kinetics and their thermodynamic analysis. Novosibirsk: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorban, A. N. (2007). Selection theorem for systems with inheritance. Math. Model. Nat. Phenom., 2(4), 1–45.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (2009). The tragedy of the commons. J. Nat. Resour. Policy Res., 1(3), 243–253.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (2003). Evolutionary game dynamics. Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 40(4), 479.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karev, G. P. (2010a). On mathematical theory of selection: continuous time population dynamics. J. Math. Biol., 60(1), 107–129.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Karev, G. P. (2010b). Principle of minimum discrimination information and replica dynamics. Entropy, 12(7), 1673–1695.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kareva, I., Berezovskaya, F., & Castillo-Chavez, C. (2012). Transitional regimes as early warning signals in resource dependent competition models. Math. Biosci.

  • Krakauer, D. C., Page, K. M., & Erwin, D. H. (2009). Diversity, dilemmas, and monopolies of niche construction. Am. Nat., 173(1), 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milinski, M., Semmann, D., & Krambeck, H. J. (2002). Reputation helps solve the tragedy of the commons. Nature, 415(6870), 424–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. H., & Page, S. E. (2007). Complex adaptive systems: an introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A. (2006). Evolutionary dynamics: exploring the equations of life. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Page, S. E. (2008). The difference: how the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies (New ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, S. E. (2011). Diversity and complexity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, D. J., & Lopez-Sepulcre, A. (2005). Can adaptation lead to extinction? Oikos, 111(3), 616–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, T. L., & Brown, J. S. (2005). Evolutionary game theory, natural selection, and Darwinian dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vollan, B., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Cooperation and the commons. Science, 330(6006), 923–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Kalle Parvinen and John Nagy for their help with adaptive dynamics. This project has been supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF—Grant DMPS-0838705), the National Security Agency (NSA—Grant H98230-09-1-0104), the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, and the Office of the Provost of Arizona State University. This material is also based upon work partially supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DMS-1135663.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Kareva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kareva, I., Morin, B. & Karev, G. Preventing the Tragedy of the Commons Through Punishment of Over-Consumers and Encouragement of Under-Consumers. Bull Math Biol 75, 565–588 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-012-9804-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-012-9804-3

Keywords

Navigation