Skip to main content
Log in

Permanence in an Intraguild Predation Model with Prey Switching

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intraguild predation, a form of omnivory that can occur in simple food webs when one species preys on and competes for limiting resources with another species, can have either a stabilizing effect (McCann and Hastings in Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264:1249–1254, 1997) or a destabilizing effect (Holt and Polis in Am. Nat. 149:745–764, 1997), depending on the assumptions of the system. Another type of behavior that has been observed in simple food web experiments (Murdoch in Ecol. Monogr. 39:335–354, 1969) is prey switching. Prey switching can occur when the predator prefers the most abundant prey. This has also been shown to be capable of having either a stabilizing effect or a destabilizing effect and even possibly lead to predator extinction (VanLeeuwen et al. in Ecology 88:1571–1581, 2007). Therefore, it is clear that incorporating prey switching into an intraguild predation model could lead to unexpected consequences. In this paper, we propose and explore such a model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blasius, B., & Tönjes, R. (2007). Predator–prey oscillations, synchronization and pattern formation in ecological systems. In Analysis and control of complex nonlinear processes in physics, chemistry and biology (pp. 397–427). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell, R. S., & Cosner, C. (2001). On the dynamics of predator–prey models with the Beddington–DeAngelis functional response. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 257, 206–222.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell, R. S., Cosner, C., & Ruan, S. (2004). Intraspecific interference and consumer-resource dynamics. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 4B, 527–546.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, J. K. (2009). Ordinary differential equations. Mineola: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. D., & Polis, G. A. (1997). A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. Am. Nat., 149, 745–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutson, V., & Schmitt, K. (1992). Permanence and the dynamics of biological systems. Math. Biosci., 111, 1–71.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kuang, Y., & Freedman, H. I. (1987). Uniqueness of limit cycles in Gause-type models of predator–prey systems. Math. Biosci., 88, 67–84.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liou, L. P., & Cheng, K. S. (1988). Global stability of a predator–prey system. J. Math. Biol., 26, 65–71.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, K., & Hastings, A. (1997). Re-evaluating the omnivory-stability relationship in food webs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, Biol. Sci., 264, 1249–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, W. W. (1969). Switching in general predators: experiments on predator specificity and stability of prey populations. Ecol. Monogr., 39, 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, D. M., Conners, M. E., & Goldberg, D. S. (2000). Prey preference by a top predator and the stability of linked food chains. Ecology, 81(1), 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanabe, K., & Namba, T. (2005). Omnivory creates chaos in simple food web models. Ecology, 86(12), 3411–3414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanLeeuwen, E., Jansen, V. A. A., & Bright, P. W. (2007). How population dynamics shape the functional response in a one-predator-two-prey system. Ecology, 88(6), 1571–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges support from the Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, NOAA Cooperative Agreement NA17RJ1226, and would also like to express his gratitude to David Die (University of Miami) for the opportunity to pursue this research and for his guidance throughout the course of the project and to Chris Cosner (University of Miami) for his helpful suggestions with the analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joaquin Zabalo.

Appendices

Appendix A: Global Asymptotic Stability of Equilibrium

Consider the predator–prey system

(27)

The general assumptions on G(x) and H(x) are:

  1. (a)

    GC 1([0,∞),ℝ), G(0)>0 and there exits K>0 such that G(K)=0 and (xK)G(x)<0 for xK. (Note: In our case, we can let G(x)=r(1−x/K).)

  2. (b)

    HC 1([0,∞),ℝ), H(0)=0 and H′(x)>0 for all x>0. (Note: In our case, we can let H(x)=bx/(a+x).)

  3. (c)

    There exists a locally stable equilibrium (x ,y ) such that mH(x )−d=0 and x G(x )−y H(x )=0 with 0<x <K, y >0, F′(x)<0 for all x xK, where \(F(x)=\frac{xG(x)}{H(x)}\).

  4. (d)

    F(2x x)≤F(x) for all x satisfying max{0,2x K}≤xx .

  5. (e)

    \(\frac{d}{H(x)}-m>m-\frac{d}{H(2x^{\ast}-x)}\) for all x satisfying x x<min{2x ,K}.

Theorem 4

(Liou and Cheng 1988)

Under the assumptions (a)(e), (x ,y ) is globally asymptotically stable for system (27) in the interior of the first quadrant.

Appendix B: Uniqueness and Global Asymptotic Stability of Limit Cycle

Consider the system

(28)

where G, P, and Q are sufficiently smooth so that existence, uniqueness, and continuability for all positive time are satisfied.

Theorem 5

(Kuang and Freedman 1987)

Suppose in the system (28) that

$$\frac{d}{dx} \biggl(\frac{xG'(x)+G(x)-xG(x)\frac{P'(x)}{P(x)}}{-\gamma+Q(x)} \biggr)\le 0 \\ $$

in 0≤x<x and x <xK. Then the system has exactly one limit cycle which is globally asymptotically stable with respect to the set {(x,y)∣x>0,y>0}∖{(x ,y )}.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zabalo, J. Permanence in an Intraguild Predation Model with Prey Switching. Bull Math Biol 74, 1957–1984 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-012-9740-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-012-9740-2

Keywords

Navigation