Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental Fluctuations and Level of Density-Compensation Strongly Affects the Probability of Fixation and Fixation Times

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The probability of, and time to, fixation of a mutation in a population has traditionally been studied by the classic Wright–Fisher model where population size is constant. Recent theoretical expansions have covered fluctuating populations in various ways but have not incorporated models of how the environment fluctuates in combination with different levels of density-compensation affecting fecundity. We tested the hypothesis that the probability of, and time to, fixation of neutral, advantageous and deleterious mutations is dependent on how the environment fluctuates over time, and on the level of density-compensation. We found that fixation probabilities and times were dependent on the pattern of autocorrelation of carrying capacity over time and interacted with density-compensation. The pattern found was most pronounced at small population sizes. The patterns differed greatly depending on whether the mutation was neutral, advantageous, or disadvantageous. The results indicate that the degree of mismatch between carrying capacity and population size is a key factor, rather than population size per se, and that effective population sizes can be very low also when the census population size is far above the carrying capacity. This study highlights the need for explicit population dynamic models and models for environmental fluctuations for the understanding of the dynamics of genes in populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Crow, J. F., & Kimura, M. (1970). An introduction to population genetics theory. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Engen, S., Lande, R., & Saether, B.-E. (2005). Effective size of a fluctuating age-structured population. Genetics, 170, 941–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engen, S., Lande, R., & Saether, B.-E. (2009). Fixation probability of beneficial mutations in a fluctuating population. Genet. Res. Camb., 91, 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1930). The distribution of gene ratios for rare mutation. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., 50, 204–219.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham, R. (1995). Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genet. Res., 66, 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, J. S. (1990). Theoretical population genetics. London: Unwin Hyman Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J. B. S. (1927). A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. Part V: Selection and mutation. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc., 23, 838–844.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Iizuka, M. (2001). The effective size of fluctuating populations. Theor. Pop. Biol., 59, 281–286.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala, V., Ranta, E., & Stenseth, N. C. (2006). Genetic structuring in fluctuating populations. Ecol. Inform., 1, 343–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. (1962). On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics, 47, 713–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M., & Crow, J. F. (1963). The measurement of effective population number. Evolution, 17, 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M., & Ohta, T. (1969). The average number of generations until fixation of a mutant in a finite population. Genetics, 61, 763–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, A. (2006). Probability of fixation under weak selection: a branchin process unifying approach. Theor. Pop. Biol., 69, 419–441.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. (1994). Risk of population extinction from fixation of new deleterious mutations. Evolution, 48, 1460–1469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, S. P., & Whitlock, M. C. (1997). The probability of fixation in populations of changing size. Genetics, 146, 723–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. L., & Quince, C. (2007). Fixation in haploid populations exhibiting density dependence I: The non-neutral case. Theor. Pop. Biol., 72, 121–135.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. L., Quince, C., & Plotkin, J. B. (2008). Absorption and fixation times for neutral and quasi-neutral populations with density dependence. Theor. Pop. Biol., 74, 302–310.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ranta, E., Lundberg, P., & Kaitala, V. P. (2006). Ecology of populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta, E., Kaitala, V., Björklund, M., Lundberg, P., Bach, L. A., & Stenseth, N. C. (2008). Climate forcing and genetic differentiation in subdivided populations. Evol. Ecol. Res., 10, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricker, W. E. (1954). Stock and recruitment. J. Fisheries Res. Board Can., 11, 559–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripa, J., & Lundberg, P. (1996). Noise colour and the risk of population extinctions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 263, 1751–1753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sano, A., Shimizu, A., & Iizuka, M. (2004). Coalescent process with fluctuating population size and its effective size. Theor. Pop. Biol., 65, 39–49.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schwager, M., Johst, K., & Jeltsch, F. (2006). Does red noise increase or decrease extinction risk? Single extreme events versus series of unfavorable conditions. Am. Nat., 167, 879–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16, 97–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1969). Evolution and the genetics of natural populations, vol. 2. The theory of gene frequencies. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Björklund.

Additional information

E. Ranta deceased August 2008.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Björklund, M., Ranta, E., Kaitala, V. et al. Environmental Fluctuations and Level of Density-Compensation Strongly Affects the Probability of Fixation and Fixation Times. Bull Math Biol 73, 1666–1681 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-010-9587-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-010-9587-3

Keywords

Navigation