Abstract
Immunodominance refers to the phenomenon in which simultaneous T cell responses against multiple target epitopes organize themselves into distinct and reproducible hierarchies. In many cases, eliminating the response to the most dominant epitope allows responses to subdominant epitopes to expand more fully. The mechanism that drives immunodominance is still not well understood, although various hypotheses have been proposed. One of the more prevalent views is that immunodominance is driven by passive T cell competition for space on antigen presenting cells (APCs) or for access to specific MHC:epitope complexes on the surface of APCs. However, several experimental studies suggest that passive competition alone may not fully explain the robustness of immunodominance under physiological conditions or varying proportions of antigen-specific precursor T cells and APCs. These studies propose that a mechanism of active suppression among T cells gives rise to immunodominance.
In this work, we present the novel hypothesis that mutual suppression of simultaneous T cell responses results from the appearance of adaptive regulatory T cells (iTregs) during the course of the overall T cell expansion. We extend the mathematical model of T cell expansion proposed in Kim et al. (Bull. Math. Biol. 2009, doi:10.1007/s11538-009-9463-1) to consider multiple, concurrent T cell responses. The model is formulated as a system of independent feedback loops, in which antigen-specific T cell population produces a nonspecific feedback response. Our simulations show that the fastest response to expand gives rise to a de novo generated population of iTregs that induces a premature contraction in slower or weaker T cell responses, leading to a hierarchical expansion as observed in immunodominance. Furthermore, in some cases, removing the dominant T cell response allows previously subdominant responses to develop more fully.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antia, R., Bergstrom, C. T., Pilyugin, S. S., Kaech, S. M., & Ahmed, R. (2003). Models of CD8+ responses: 1. What is the antigen-independent proliferation program. J. Theor. Biol., 221(4), 585–598.
Borghans, J. A., Taams, L. S., Wauben, M. H., & de Boer, R. J. (1999). Competition for antigenic sites during T cell proliferation: a mathematical interpretation of in vitro data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96(19), 10782–10787.
Bousso, P., & Robey, E. (2003). Dynamics of CD8+ T cell priming by dendritic cells in intact lymph nodes. Nat. Immunol., 4(6), 579–585.
Catron, D. M., Itano, A. A., Pape, K. A., Mueller, D. L., & Jenkins, M. K. (2004). Visualizing the first 50 hr of the primary immune response to a soluble antigen. Immunity, 21(3), 341–347.
Chang, C. C., Ciubotariu, R., Manavalan, J. S., Yuan, J., Colovai, A. I., Piazza, F., Lederman, S., Colonna, M., Cortesini, R., Dalla-Favera, R., & Suciu-Foca, N. (2002). Tolerization of dendritic cells by T(S) cells: the crucial role of inhibitory receptors ILT3 and ILT4. Nat. Immunol., 3(3), 237–243.
De Boer, R. J., & Perelson, A. S. (1994). T cell repertoires and competitive exclusion. J. Theor. Biol., 169(4), 375–390.
De Boer, R. J., & Perelson, A. S. (1995). Toward a general function describing T cell proliferation. J. Theor. Biol., 175(4), 567–576.
De Boer, R. J., Oprea, M., Antia, R., Murali-Krishna, K., Ahmed, R., & Perelson, A. S. (2001). Recruitment times, proliferation, and apoptosis rates during the CD8(+) T-cell response to lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. J. Virol., 75, 10663–10669.
De Boer, R. J., Homann, D., & Perelson, A. S. (2003). Different dynamics of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses during and after acute lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection. J. Immunol., 171(8), 3928–3935.
Grufman, P., Wolpert, E. Z., Sandberg, J. K., & Karre, K. (1999). T cell competition for the antigen-presenting cell as a model for immunodominance in the cytotoxic T lymphocyte response against minor histocompatibility antigens. Eur. J. Immunol., 29(7), 2197–2204.
Handel, A., & Antia, R. (2008). A simple mathematical model helps to explain the immunodominance of CD8 T cells in influenza A virus infections. J. Virol., 82(16), 7768–7772.
Kaech, S. M., & Ahmed, R. (2001). Memory CD8+ T cell differentiation: initial antigen encounter triggers a developmental program in naïve cells. Nat. Immunol., 2(5), 415–422.
Kedl, R. M., Rees, W. A., Hildeman, D. A., Schaefer, B., Mitchell, T., Kappler, J., & Marrack, P. (2000). T cells compete for access to antigen-bearing antigen-presenting cells. J. Exp. Med., 192(8), 1105–1113.
Kedl, R. M., Kappler, J. W., & Marrack, P. (2003). Epitope dominance, competition and T cell affinity maturation. Curr. Opin. Immunol., 15(1), 120–127.
Kim, P. S., Lee, P. P., & Levy, D. Emergent group dynamics governed by regulatory cells produce a robust primary T cell response. Bull. Math. Biol. doi:10.1007/s11538-009-9463-1. Published on-line Dec. 2009.
León, K., Lage, A., & Carneiro, J. (2007a). How regulatory CD25+CD4+ T cells impinge on tumor immunobiology? on the existence of two alternative dynamical classes of tumors. J. Theor. Biol., 247(1), 122–137.
León, K., Lage, A., & Carneiro, J. (2007b). How regulatory CD25+CD4+ T cells impinge on tumor immunobiology: the differential response of tumors to therapies. J. Immunol., 179(9), 5659–5668.
Manca, F. (1992). Selective functional depletion of HIV gp120 peptides complexed with MHC from antigen-presenting cells engaged with specific T lymphocytes. J. Immunol., 149(3), 796–800.
Mercado, R., Vijh, S., Allen, S. E., Kerksiek, K., Pilip, I. M., & Pamer, E. G. (2000). Early programming of T cell populations responding to bacterial infection. J. Immunol., 165(12), 6833–6839.
Miller, M. J., Hejazi, A. S., Wei, S. H., Cahalan, M. D., & Parker, I. (2004a). T cell repertoire scanning is promoted by dynamic dendritic cell behavior and random T cell motility in the lymph node. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101(4), 998–1003.
Miller, M. J., Safrina, O., Parker, I., & Cahalan, M. D. (2004b). Imaging the single cell dynamics of CD4+ T cell activation by dendritic cells in lymph nodes. J. Exp. Med., 200(7), 847–856.
Nowak, M. A. (1996). Immune responses against multiple epitopes: a theory for immunodominance and antigenic variation. Semin. Virol., 7, 83–92.
Probst, H. C., Dumrese, T., & van den Broek, M. F. (2002). Cutting edge: competition for APC by CTLs of different specificities is not functionally important during induction of antiviral responses. J. Immunol., 168(11), 5387–5391.
Razvi, E. S., Jiang, Z., Woda, B. A., & Welsh, R. M. (1995). Lymphocyte apoptosis during the silencing of the immune response to acute viral infections in normal, lpr, and Bcl-2-transgenic mice. Am. J. Pathol., 147(1), 79–91.
Renno, T., Attinger, A., Locatelli, S., Bakker, T., Vacheron, S., & MacDonald, H. R. (1999). Cutting edge: apoptosis of superantigen-activated T cells occurs preferentially after a discrete number of cell divisions in vivo. J. Immunol., 162(11), 6312–6315.
Roy-Proulx, G., Meunier, M. C., Lanteigne, A. M., Brochu, S., & Perreault, C. (2001). Immunodomination results from functional differences between competing CTL. Eur. J. Immunol., 31(8), 2284–2292.
Scherer, A., & Bonhoeffer, S. (2005). Epitope down-modulation as a mechanism for the coexistence of competing T-cells. J. Theor. Biol., 233(3), 379–390.
Scherer, A., Salathé, M., & Bonhoeffer, S. (2006). High epitope expression levels increase competition between T cells. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2(8), e109.
Sercarz, E. E., Lehmann, P. V., Ametani, A., Benichou, G., Miller, A., & Moudgil, K. (1993). Dominance and crypticity of T cell antigenic determinants. Annu. Rev. Immunol., 11, 729–766.
Surh, C. D., & Sprent, J. (2008). Homeostasis of naive and memory T cells. Immunity, 29, 848–862.
Taams, L. S., van Rensen, A. J., Poelen, M. C., van Els, C. A., Besseling, A. C., Wagenaar, J. P., van Eden, W., & Wauben, M. H. (1998). Anergic T cells actively suppress T cell responses via the antigen-presenting cell. Eur. J. Immunol., 28(9), 2902–2912.
Thomas, P. G., Brown, S. A., Keating, R., Yue, W., Morris, M. Y., So, J., Webby, R. J., & Doherty, P.C. (2007). Hidden epitopes emerge in secondary influenza virus-specific CD8+ T cell responses. J. Immunol., 178(5), 3091–3098.
Trimble, L. A., & Lieberman, J. (1998). Circulating CD8 T lymphocytes in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals have impaired function and downmodulate CD3 zeta, the signalling chain of the T-cell receptor complex. Blood, 91(2), 585–594.
van der Most, R. G., Murali-Krishna, K., Lanier, J. G., Wherry, E. J., Puglielli, M. T., Blattman, J. N., Sette, A., & Ahmed, R. (2003). Changing immunodominance patterns in antiviral CD8 T-cell responses after loss of epitope presentation or chronic antigenic stimulation. Virology, 315(1), 93–102.
van Stipdonk, M. J., Hardenberg, G., Bijker, M. S., Lemmens, E. E., Droin, N. M., Green, D. R., & Schoenberger, S. P. (2003). Dynamic programming of CD8+ T lymphocyte responses. Nat. Immunol., 4(4), 361–365.
Vijh, S., Pilip, I. M., & Pamer, E. G. (1999). Noncompetitive expansion of cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for different antigens during bacterial infection. Infect. Immun., 67, 1303–1309.
Walker, M. R., Carson, B. D., Nepom, G. T., Ziegler, S. F., & Buckner, J. H. (2005). De novo generation of antigen-specific CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells from human CD4+CD25- cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102(11), 4103–4108.
Weidt, G., Utermohlen, O., Heukeshoven, J., Lehmann-Grube, F., & Deppert, W. (1998). Relationship among immunodominance of single CD8+ T cell epitopes, virus load, and kinetics of primary antiviral CTL response. J. Immunol., 160, 2923–2931.
Wodarz, D., & Thomsen, A. R. (2005). Effect of the CTL proliferation program on virus dynamics. Int. Immunol., 17(9), 1269–1276.
Yang, Y., Kim, D., & Fathman, C. G. (1998). Regulation of programmed cell death following T cell activation in vivo. Int. Immunol., 10(2), 175–183.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, P.S., Lee, P.P. & Levy, D. A Theory of Immunodominance and Adaptive Regulation. Bull Math Biol 73, 1645–1665 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-010-9585-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-010-9585-5