Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient or Inaccurate? Analytical and Numerical Modelling of Random Search Strategies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A large number of observational and theoretical studies have investigated animal movement strategies for finding randomly located food items. Many of these studies have claimed that a particular strategy is advantageous over other strategies or that the spatial distribution of the food items affects the search efficiency. Here, we study a deliberately idealised problem, in which a blind forager searches for re-visitable food items. We show analytically that the forager’s efficiency is completely independent of both its movement strategy and the spatial pattern of the food items and depends only on the density of food in the environment. However, in some cases, apparent optima in search strategies can arise as artefacts of inappropriate and inaccurate numerical simulations. We discuss modifications to the idealised foraging problem that can confer an advantage on certain strategies, including when the forager has some memory or knowledge of the environment; when the food items are non-revisitable; and when the problem is viewed in an evolutionary context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, D., Bowen, W.D., McMillan, J.I., 2004. Intraspecific variation in movement patterns: modelling individual behaviour in a large marine predator. Oikos 105, 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartumeus, F., 2009. Behavioral intermittence, Lévy patterns, and randomness in animal movement. Oikos 118, 488–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartumeus, F., Catalan, J., Fulco, U.L., Lyra, M.L., Viswanathan, G.M., 2002. Optimizing the encounter rate in biological interactions: Lévy versus Brownian strategies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 097901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartumeus, F., da Luz, M.G.E., Viswanathan, G.M., Catalan, J., 2005. Animal search strategies: a quantitative random walk analysis. Ecol. 86, 3078–3087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou, S., 2007. How many animals really do the Lévy walk? Ecol. 88, 1962–1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bénichou, O., Coppey, M., Suet, P.-H., Voituriez, R., 2005. Optimal search strategies for hidden targets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 198101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bénichou, O., Coppey, M., Moreau, M., Voituriez, R., 2006a. Intermittent search strategies: when losing tine becomes efficient. Europhys. Lett. 75, 349–354.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bénichou, O., Loverdo, C., Moreau, M., Voituriez, R., 2006b. Two-dimensional intermittent search processes: An alternative to Lévy flight strategies. Phys. Rev. E 74, 020102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, J.P., Georges, A., 1990. Anomalous diffusion in disordered media. Phys. Rep. 195, 127–293.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C.T., Liebovitch, L.S., Glendon, R., 2007. Lévy flights in Dobe Ju/’hoansi foraging patterns. Hum. Ecol. 35, 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrow, J.F., Baxter, P.D., Pitchford, J.W., 2008. Lévy processes, saltatory foraging, and superdiffusion. Math. Mod. Nat. Phenom. 3, 115–130.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clauset, A., Shalizi, C.R., Newman, M.E.J., 2007. Power-law distributions in empirical data. arXiv:0706.1062v1.

  • Cooper, W.E. Jr., 2005. The foraging mode controversy: both continuous variation and clustering of foraging movements occur. J. Zool. 267, 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currey, J.D., Pitchford, J.W., 2007. Variability of the mechanical properties of bone, and its evolutionary consequences. J. R. Soc. Interface 4, 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dall, S.R.X., Giraldeau, L.-A., Olsson, O., McNamara, J.M., Stephens, D.W., 2005. Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trend Ecol. Evol. 20, 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A.M., Phillips, R.A., Watkins, N.W., Freeman, M.P., Murphy, E.J., Afanasyev, V., Buldyrev, S.V., da Luz, M.G.E., Raposo, E.P., Stanley, H.E., Viswanathan, G.M., 2007. Revisiting Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatross, bumblebees and deer. Nature 449, 1044–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J.M.C., Waser, P.M., 2007. Use, misuse and extensions of “ideal gas” models of animal encounter. Biol. Rev. 82, 335–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, A., Plank, M.J., Brown, R., 2008. Optimizing the encounter rate in biological interactions: ballistic versus Lévy versus Brownian strategies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 051128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomholt, M.A., Koren, T., Metzler, R., Klafter, J., 2007. The advantage of Lévy strategies in intermittent search processes. arXiv:0709.2352v1.

  • Mackenzie, B.R., Kiørboe, T., 1995. Enconter rates and swimming behaviour of pause–travel and cruise larval fish predators in calm and turbulent laboratory environments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 40, 1278–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mȧrell, A., Ball, J.P., Hofgaard, A., 2002. Foraging and movement paths of female reindeer: insights from fractal analysis, correlated random walks, and Lévy flights. Can. J. Zool. 80, 854–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M.E.J., 2006. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemp. Phys. 46, 323–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitchford, J.W., Brindley, J., 2001. Prey patchiness, predator survival and fish recruitment. Bull. Math. Biol. 63, 527–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitchford, J.W., James, A., Brindley, J., 2005. Quantifying the effects of individual and environmental variability in fish recruitment. Fish. Oceanogr. 14, 156–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plank, M.J., James, A., 2008. Optimal foraging: Lévy pattern or process? J. R. Soc. Interface 5, 1077–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Fernández, G., Mateos, J.L., Miramontes, O., Cocho, G., Larralde, H., Ayala-Orozco, B., 2004. Lévy walk patterns in the foraging movements of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55, 223–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raposo, E.P., Buldyrev, S.V., da Luz, M.G.E., Santos, M.C., Stanley, H.E., Viswanathan, G.M., 2003. Dynamical robustness of Lévy search strategies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 240601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Real, L.A., 1980. Fitness, uncertainty, and the role of diversification in evolution and behaviour. Am. Nat. 115, 623–638.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds A.M., 2009. Adaptive Lévy walks can outperform composite Brownian walks in non-destructive random searching scenarios. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 388, 561–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, A.M., Frye, M.A., 2007. Free-flight odor tracking in Drosophila is consistent with an optimal intermittent scale-free search. PLoS ONE 2, e354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, A.M., Rhodes, C.J., 2009. The Lévy flight paradigm: random search patterns and mechanisms. Ecol. 90, 877–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, A.M., Smith, A.D., Menzel, R., Greggers, U., Reynolds, D.R., Riley, J.R., 2007. Displaced honey bees perform optimal scale-free search flights. Ecol. 88, 1955–1961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruzicka, J.J., Gallager, S.M., 2006. The saltatory search behaviour of larval cod (Gadus morhua). Deep-sea Res. 53, 2735–2757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M.C., Raposo, E.P., Viswanathan, G.M., da Luz, M.G.E., 2004. Optimal random searches of revisitable targets: crossover from superdiffusive to ballistic random walks. Europhys. Lett. 67, 734–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shlesinger, M.F., 2006. Search research. Nature 443, 281–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, D.W., Righton, D., Pitchford, J.W., 2007. Minimizing errors in identifying Lévy flight behaviour of organisms. J. Anim. Ecol. 76, 222–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, D.W., Southall, E.J., Humphries, N.E., Hays, G.C., Bradshaw, C.J.A., Pitchford, J.W., James, A., Ahmed, M.Z., Brierley, A.S., Hindell, M.A., Morritt, D., Musyl, M.K., Righton, D., Shepard, E.L.C., Wearmouth, V.J., Wilson, R.P., Witt, M.J., Metcalfe, J.D., 2008. Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour. Nature 451, 1098–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis, J.M.J., Palmer, S.C.F., 2005. Spatial processes can determine the relationship between prey encounter rate and prey density. Biol. Lett. 1, 136–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, G.M., Afanasyev, V., Buldyrev, S.V., Murphy, E.J., Prince, P.A., Stanley, H.E., 1996. Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses. Nature 381, 413–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, G.M., Buldyrev, S.V., Havlin, S., da Luz, M.G.E., Raposo, E.P., Stanley, H.E., 1999. Optimising the success of random searches. Nature 401, 911–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, G.M., Afanasyev, V., Buldyrev, S.V., Havlin, S., da Luz, M.G.E., Raposo, E.P., Stanley, H.E., 2000. Lévy flights in random searches. Physica A 282, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, G.M., Afanasyev, V., Buldyrev, S.V., Havlin, S., da Luz, M.G.E., Raposo, E.P., Stanley, H.E., 2001. Lévy flight search patterns of biological organisms. Physica A 295, 85–88.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Weimerskirch, H., Gault, A., Cherel, Y., 2005. Prey distribution and patchiness: factors in foraging success and efficiency of wandering albatrosses. Ecol. 86, 2611–2622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan W. Pitchford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

James, A., Pitchford, J.W. & Plank, M.J. Efficient or Inaccurate? Analytical and Numerical Modelling of Random Search Strategies. Bull. Math. Biol. 72, 896–913 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-009-9473-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-009-9473-z

Navigation