Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neutral Models with Generalised Speciation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hubbell’s neutral theory claims that ecological patterns such as species abundance distributions can be explained by a stochastic model based on simple assumptions. One of these assumptions, the point mutation assumption, states that every individual has the same probability to speciate. Etienne et al. have argued that other assumptions on the speciation process could be more realistic, for example, that every species has the same probability to speciate (Etienne, et al. in Oikos 116:241–258, 2007). They introduced a number of neutral community models with a different speciation process, and conjectured formulas for their stationary species abundance distribution. Here we study a generalised neutral community model, encompassing these modified models, and derive its stationary distribution, thus proving the conjectured formulas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, G., 2001. Neutral macroecology. Science 293, 2413–2418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne, R.S., 2005. A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 8, 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne, R.S., Alonso, D., 2007. Neutral community theory: how stochasticity and dispersal-limitation can explain species coexistence. J. Stat. Phys. 128, 485–510.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne, R.S., Apol, M.E.F., Olff, H., Weissing, F.J., 2007. Modes of speciation and the neutral theory of biodiversity. Oikos 116, 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne, R.S., Apol, M.E.F., 2009. Estimating speciation and extinction rates from diversity data and the fossil record. Evolution 63, 244–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewens, W.J., 1972. The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theor. Popul. Biol. 3, 87–112.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haegeman, B., Etienne, R.S., 2008. Relaxing the zero-sum assumption in neutral biodiversity theory. J. Theor. Biol. 252, 288–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell, S.P., 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarieva, A.M., Gorshkov, V.G., 2004. On the dependence of speciation rates on species abundance and characteristic population size. J. Biosci. 29, 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, B.J., Etienne, R.S., Gray, J.S., Alonso, D., Anderson, M.J., Benecha, H.K., Dornelas, M., Enquist, B.J., Green, J., He, F., Hurlbert, A., Magurran, A.E., Marquet, P.A., Maurer, B.A., Ostling, A., Soykan, C.U., Ugland, K., White, K., 2007. Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecol. Lett. 10, 995–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P.A.P., 1962. Statistical Processes of Evolutionary Theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rosindell, J.L., Cornell, S.J., 2007. Species-area relationships from a spatially explicit neutral model in an infinite landscape. Ecol. Lett. 10, 586–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S.M., 1975. A theory of evolution above the species level. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 646–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kampen, N.G., 1992. Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bart Haegeman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haegeman, B., Etienne, R.S. Neutral Models with Generalised Speciation. Bull. Math. Biol. 71, 1507–1519 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-009-9411-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-009-9411-0

Keywords

Navigation