Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Dynamic Allocation of Conservation Funding Among Priority Regions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The optimal allocation of conservation resources between biodiverse conservation regions has generally been calculated using stochastic dynamic programming, or using myopic heuristics. These solutions are hard to interpret and may not be optimal. To overcome these two limitations, this paper approaches the optimal conservation resource allocation problem using optimal control theory. A solution using Pontryagin’s maximum principle provides novel insight into the general properties of efficient conservation resource allocation strategies, and allows more extensive testing of the performance of myopic heuristics. We confirmed that a proposed heuristic (minimize short-term loss) yields near-optimal results in complex allocation situations, and found that a qualitative allocation feature observed in previous analyses (bang-bang allocation) is a general property of the optimal allocation strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armsworth, P.R., Daily, G.C., Kareiva, P., Sanchirico, J.N., 2006. Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103(14), 5403–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford, A., Gaston, K., Blyth, S., James, A., Kapos, V., 2003. Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100(3), 1046–050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford, A., Bennun, L., Brink, B.T., Cooper, D., Cote, I.M., Crane, P., Dobson, A., Dudley, N., Dutton, I., Green, R.E., Gregory, R.D., Harrison, J., Kennedy, E.T., Kremen, C., Leader-Williams, N., Lovejoy, T.E., Mace, G., May, R., Mayaux, P., Morling, P., Phillips, J., Redford, K., Ricketts, T.H., Paul Rodríguez, J., Sanjayan, M., Schei, P.J., van Jaarsveld, A.S., Walther, B.A., 2005. The convention on biological diversity’s 2010 target. Science 307, 212–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, R.E., Dreyfuss, S.E., 1962. Applied Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bode, M., Wilson, K.A., Brooks, T.M., Turner, W.R., Mittermeier, R.A., McBride, M.F., Underwood, E.C., Possingham, H.P., 2008. Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105(17), 6498–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, T.M., Mittermeier, R.A., da Fonseca, G.A.B., Gerlach, J., Hoffmann, M., Lamoreux, J.M., Mittermeier, C.G., Pilgrim, J.D., Rodrigues, A.S.L., 2006. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313, 58–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEPF 2006. Protecting nature’s hotspots for people and prosperity: annual report 2006. Critical Ecosystems Partnership Fund.

  • Clark, C.W., 1990. Mathematical Bioeconomics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, C., Polasky, S., 2004. Dynamic reserve site selection. Resour. Energy Econ. 26, 157–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, B.S., Gaines, S.D., Warner, R.R., 2004. Confounding effects of the export of production and the displacement of fishing effort from marine reserves. Ecol. Appl. 14, 1248–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN, 2003. Recommendations of the 5th annual IUCN world parks congress. IUCN.

  • James, A.N., Gaston, K.J., Balmford, A., 1999. Balancing the earth’s accounts. Nature 401, 323–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., 2003. Conserving biodiversity coldspots. Am. Sci. 91, 344–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, D., Long, N.V., 1992. Optimal Control Theory and Static Optimization in Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C., Pressey, R.L., 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405, 243–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, M.F., Wilson, K.A., Possingham, H.P., 2005. Incorporating investment uncertainty into the prioritisation of conservation resource allocation. In Proceedings of the 2005 MODSIM International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.

  • McBride, M.F., Wilson, K.A., Bode, M., Possingham, H.P., 2007. Incorporating the effects of socioeconomic uncertainty into priority setting for conservation investment. Conserv. Biol. 21(6), 1463–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meir, E., Andleman, S., Possingham, H.P., 2004. Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world? Ecol. Lett. 7, 615–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R.A., Gil, P.R., Hoffman, M., Pilgrim, J., Brooks, T., Mittermeier, C.G., Lamoreux, J., da Fonseca, G.A.B., 2005. Hotspots revisited. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., da Fonseca, G.A.B., Kent, J., 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Ferraro, P.J., Polasky, S., Ricketts, T.H., Rouget, M., 2007. Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 681–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontryagin, L.S., Boltyanskii, V.G., Gamkrelidze, R.V., Mishchenko, E.F., 1962. The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Possingham, H.P., Wilson, K.A., 2005. Turning up the heat on hotspots. Nature 436, 919–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P., 1992. Numerical Recipes in C: the Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, R.L., Tully, S.L., 1994. The cost of ad hoc reservation: a case study in western new south wales. Aust. J. Ecol. 19, 375–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, S.A., Possingham, H.P., Tizard, J., 1999. Optimal fire management for maintaining community diversity. Ecol. Appl. 9(3), 880–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, J.P., Rodriguez-Clark, K.M., Oliveira-Miranda, M.A., Good, T., Grajal, A., 2006. Professional capacity building: the missing agenda in conservation priority setting. Conserv. Biol. 5, 1340–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.L., 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rout, T.M., Hauser, C.E., Possingham, H.P., 2007. Minimise long-term loss or maximise short-term gain? Ecol. Model. 201(1), 67–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R.R., Noyce, T., Possingham, H.P., 2003. Opportunity cost of ad hoc marine reserve design decisions: an example from South Australia. Marine Ecol. Prog. Ser. 253, 25–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenhumberg, B., Tyre, A.J., Shea, K., Possingham, H.P., 2004. Linking wild and captive populations to maximize species persistence: optimal translocation strategies. Conserv. Biol. 18(5), 1–1. Stochastic dynamic programming.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K.A., Pressey, R.L., Newton, A., Burgman, M., Possingham, H., Weston, C., 2005. Measuring and incorporating vulnerability into conservation planning. Environ. Manag. 35, 537–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K.A., McBride, M.F., Bode, M., Possingham, H.P., 2006. Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature 440, 337–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K.A., Underwood, E.C., Morrison, S.A., Klausmeyer, K.R., Murdoch, W.W., Reyers, B., Wardell-Johnson, G., Marquet, P.A., Rundel, P.W., McBride, M.F., Pressey, R.L., Bode, M., Hoekstra, J.M., Andelman, S., Looker, M., Rondinini, C., Kareiva, P., Shaw, M.R., Possingham, H.P., 2007. Conserving biodiversity efficiently: what to do, where, and when. Public Libr. Sci. Biol. 5, e223.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Bode.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bode, M., Wilson, K., McBride, M. et al. Optimal Dynamic Allocation of Conservation Funding Among Priority Regions. Bull. Math. Biol. 70, 2039–2054 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-008-9343-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-008-9343-0

Keywords

Navigation