Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is Food Worth Fighting for? ESS’s in Mixed Populations of Kleptoparasites and Foragers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We extend the game theoretic model of kleptoparasitism discussed in Broom et al. (2004), by considering a population of foragers consisting of two groups with different behaviours—those who forage and steal from other feeders, and those who only forage. We a sume that those who do not steal have a better foraging rate than those who are also looking out for opportunities to steal. We also allow either type to resist an attack or not resist. We look for Evolutionary Stable States, of either a mixture of the two behaviours, or where the whole population has just one of these behaviours. We find nine such ESS’s, dependent on the environmental parameters, although in fact only five of these are distinguishable. In general, we find that if the overall population density is low, food-stealing becomes less viable, and there is an ESS consisting of only foragers. Conversely, when there are many animals looking for, and finding, food, there is an ESS consisting of just kleptoparasites (which are also foraging). In between, an ESS will contain both pure-foragers and stealers. There is some empirical evidence of such behaviours.

We find that when there is a mixture of the two types, they must both have the same resistive behaviour. We can thus have some individuals challenging for food but not resisting challenges, and others not challenging and not resisting. This shows how aggressive behaviour may be context-dependent, as seen in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnard, C.J., Sibly, R.M., 1981. Producers and scroungers: A general model and its application to captive flocks of house sparrows. Ani. Beha. 29, 543–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann, H.J., Barnard, C.J., 1979. Kleptoparasitism in birds. Anim. Beha. 27, 487–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom, M., Ruxton, G.D., 1998. Evolutionarily stable stealing: Game theory applied to kleptoparasitism. Beha. Ecol. 9, 397–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom, M., Ruxton, G.D., 2003. Evolutionarily stable kleptoparasitism: Consequences of different prey types. Beha. Ecol. 14, 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom, M., Luther, R.M., Ruxton, G.D., 2004. Resistance is useless? Extensions to the game theory of kleptoparasitism. Bull. Math. Biol. 66, 1645–1658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukas, R., 2002. Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357, 1539–1547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dukas, R., Ellner, S., 1993. Information Processing and prey detection. Ecology 74, 1337–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dukas, R., Kamil, A.C., 2001. Limited attention, The constraint underlying search images. Beha. Ecol. 12, 192–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furness, R.W., 1987. Kleptoparasitism in seabirds. In: Croxall, J.P. (Ed.), Seabirds: Feeding ecology and role in marine ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

  • Holling, C.S., 1959. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entom. 91, 385–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J.R., Davies, N.B., 1993. An introduction to Behavioural Ecology, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith, J., 1982. Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

  • Ruxton, G.D., Broom, M., 1999. Evolution of kleptoparasitism as a war of attrition. J. Evol. Biol. 12, 755–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shealer, D.A., Spendelow, J.A., 2002. Individual foraging strategies of kleptoparasitic Roseate Terns. Waterbirds 25, 436–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stillman, R.A., Goss-Custard, J.D., Caldow, R.W.G., 1997. Modelling interference from basic foraging behaviour. J. Anim. Ecol. 66, 692–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger M. Luther.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luther, R.M., Broom, M. & Ruxton, G.D. Is Food Worth Fighting for? ESS’s in Mixed Populations of Kleptoparasites and Foragers. Bull. Math. Biol. 69, 1121–1146 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-005-9052-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-005-9052-x

Keywords

Navigation