Abstract
Rainfall provides essential water resource for vegetation growth and acts as driving force for hydrologic process, bedrock weathering and nutrient cycle in the steep hilly catchment. But the effects of rainfall features, vegetation types, topography, and also their interactions on soil water movement and soil moisture dynamics are inadequately quantified. During the coupled wet and dry periods of the year 2018 to 2019, time-series soil moisture was monitored with 5-min interval resolution in a hilly catchment of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area in China. Three hillslopes covered with evergreen forest (EG), secondary deciduous forest mixed with shrubs (SDFS) and deforested pasture (DP) were selected, and two monitoring sites with five detected depths were established at upslope and downslope position, respectively. Several parameters expressing soil moisture response to rainfall event were evaluated, including wetting depth, cumulative rainfall amount and lag time before initial response, maximum increase of soil water storage, and transform ratio of rainwater to soil water. The results indicated that rainfall amount is the dominant rainfall variable controlling soil moisture response to rainfall event. No soil moisture response occurred when rainfall amounts was <8 mm, and all the deepest monitoring sensors detected soil moisture increase when total rainfall amounts was >30 mm. In the wet period, the cumulative rainfall amount to trigger surface soil moisture response in EG-up site was significantly higher than in other five sites. However, no significant difference in cumulative rainfall amount to trigger soil moisture response was observed among all study sites in dry period. Vegetation canopy interception reduced the transform ratio of rainwater to soil water, with a higher reduction in vegetation growth period than in other period. Also, interception of vegetation canopy resulted in a larger accumulated rainfall amount and a longer lag time for initiating soil moisture response to rainfall. Generally, average cumulative rainfall amount for initiating soil moisture response during dry period of all sites (3.5–5.6 mm) were less than during wet period (5.7–19.7 mm). Forests captured more infiltration water compared with deforested pasture, showing the larger increments of both soil water storage for the whole soil profile and volumetric soil water content at 10 cm depth on two forest slopes. Topography dominated soil subsurface flow, proven by the evidences that less rainfall amount and less time was needed to trigger soil moisture response and also larger accumulated soil water storage increment in downslope site than in corresponding upslope site during heavy rainfall events.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albertson J D, Kiely G, 2001. On the structure of soil moisture time series in the context of land surface models. Journal of Hydrology, 243(1/2):101–119.
Bales R C, Hopmans J W, O'Geen A T et al., 2011. Soil moisture response to snowmelt and rainfall in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. Vadose Zone Journal, 10(3):786–799.
Bogena H R, Herbst M, Huisman J A et al., 2010. Potential of wireless sensor networks for measuring soil water content variability. Vadose Zone Journal, 9(4):1002–1013.
Brantley S L, Eissenstat D M, Marshall J A et al., 2017. Reviews and syntheses: On the roles trees play in building and plumbing the critical zone. Biogeosciences, 14(22):5115–5142.
Burt T P, Butcher D P, 1985. Topographic controls of soil moisture distributions. Journal of Soil Science, 36(3):469–486.
Crockford R H, Richardson D P, 2000. Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and interception: Effect of forest type, ground cover and climate. Hydrological Processes, 14(16/17):2903–2920.
Famiglietti J S, Rudnicki J W, Rodell M, 1998. Variability in surface moisture content along a hillslope transect: Rattlesnake Hill, Texas. Journal of Hydrology, 210(1-4):259–281.
Gash J H C, 1979. An analytical model of rainfall interception by forests. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 105(443):43–55.
Graham C B, Lin H S, 2011. Controls and frequency of preferential flow occurrence: A 175-event analysis. Vadose Zone Journal, 10(3):816–831.
Grayson R B, Western A W, Chiew F H S et al., 1997. Preferred states in spatial soil moisture patterns: Local and nonlocal controls. Water Resources Research, 33(12):2897–2908.
Guo L, Fan B, Zhang J et al., 2018. Occurrence of subsurface lateral flow in the Shale Hills Catchment indicated by a soil water mass balance method. European Journal of Soil Science, 69(5):771–786.
Guo L, Lin H, 2018. Addressing two bottlenecks to advance the understanding of preferential flow in soils. Advances in Agronomy, 147: 61–117.
Guzzetti F, Peruccacci S, Rossi M et al., 2008. The rainfall intensity–duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows: An update. Landslides, 5(1):3–17.
He Z, Zhao W, Liu H et al., 2012. The response of soil moisture to rainfall event size in subalpine grassland and meadows in a semi-arid mountain range: A case study in northwestern China’s Qilian Mountains. Journal of Hydrology, 420: 183–190
Hu W, Si B C, 2014. Revealing the relative influence of soil and topographic properties on soil water content distribution at the watershed scale in two sites. Journal of Hydrology, 516: 107–118.
Iida S, Tanaka T, Sugita M, 2005. Change of interception process due to the succession from Japanese red pine to evergreen oak. Journal of Hydrology, 315(1/4):154–166.
Jia Y H, Shao M A, 2014. Dynamics of deep soil moisture in response to vegetation restoration on the Loess Pla teau of China. Journal of Hydrology, 519: 523–531.
Kim S, Lee H, Woo N C et al., 2007. Soil moisture monitoring on a steep hillside. Hydrological Processes: nternational Journal, 21(21):2910–2922.
Lana-Renault N, Nadal-Romero E, Serrano-Muela M P et al., 2014. Comparative analysis of the response of various land covers to an exceptional rainfall event in the central Spanish Pyrenees, October 2012. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 39(5)}:581–
Li X Y, Zhang S Y, Peng H Y et al., 2013. Soil water and temperature dynamics in shrub-encroached grasslands and climatic implications: Results from Inner Mongolia steppe ecosystem of north China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 171: 20–30.
Lin H, 2010. Linking principles of soil formation and flow regimes. Journal of Hydrology, 393(1/2):3–19.
Lin H, Zhou X, 2008. Evidence of subsurface preferential flow using soil hydrologic monitoring in the Shale Hills catchment. European Journal of Soil Science, 59(1):34–49.
Liu M, Guo L, Yi J et al., 2018. Characterising preferential flow and its interaction with the soil matrix using dye tracing in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area of China. Soil Research, 56(6):588–600.
McDonnell J J, 2003. Where does water go when it rains? Moving beyond the variable source area concept of rainfall-runoff response. Hydrological Processes, 17(9):1869–1875.
Rinderer M, van Meerveld I, Stähli M et al., 2016. Is groundwater response timing in a pre-alpine catchment controlled more by topography or by rainfall? Hydrological Processes, 30(7):1036–1051.
Shao M, Jia X, Wang Y et al., 2016. A review of studies on dried soil layers in the Loess Plateau. Advances in Earth Science, 31(1):14–22. (in Chinese)
Sidle R C, Tsuboyama Y, Noguchi S et al., 1995. Seasonal hydrologic response at various spatial scales in a small forested catchment, Hitachi Ohta, Japan. Journal of Hydrology, 168(1-4):227–250.
Tomer M D, Anderson J L, 1995. Variation of soil water storage across a sand plain hillslope. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 59(4):1091–1100.
Uchida T, McDonnell J J, Asano Y, 2006. Functional intercomparison of hillslopes and small catchments by examining water source, flowpath and mean residence time. Journal of Hydrology, 327(3/4):627–642.
Wang S, Fu B, Gao G et al., 2013. Responses of soil moisture in different land cover types to rainfall events in a re-vegetation catchment area of the Loess Plateau, China. Catena, 101: 122–128.
Western A W, Grayson R B, Blöschl G et al., 1999. Observed spatial organization of soil moisture and its relation to terrain indices. Water Resources Research, 35(3):797–810.
Wiekenkamp I, Huisman J A, Bogena H R et al., 2016. Spatial and temporal occurrence of preferential flow in a forested headwater catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 534: 139–149.
Wu J, Huang J, Han X et al., 2003. Three-Gorges Dam-experiment in habitat fragmentation. Science: cology, 300: 1239–1240.
Xu Q, Liu S, Wan X et al., 2012. Effects of rainfall on soil moisture and water movement in a subalpine dark coniferous forest in southwestern China. Hydrological Processes, 26(25):3800–3809.
Yin Y, Wang H, Gao Y et al., 2010. Real-time monitoring and early warning of landslides at relocated Wushan Town, the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Landslides, 7(3):339–349.
Yu B, Liu G, Liu Q et al., 2018. Soil moisture variations at different topographic domains and land use types in the semi-arid Loess Plateau, China. Catena, 165: 125–132.
Zhu Q, Nie X, Zhou X et al., 2014. Soil moisture response to rainfall at different topographic positions along a mixed land-use hillslope. Catena, 119: 61–70.
Acknowledgements
We appreciate the assistance from the Governors of the Dalaoling Forest Park during the field experiment. Graduate students Lou Shulan, Yang Xiufeng, Li Xiangfu, and Yang Ye are acknowledged for their field work and laboratory measurements.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41771261, No.41601215; Hubei Province Natural Science Foundation of China, No.2015CFA141, No.2016CFA027, No.2019CFB766; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, No.CCNU18QN002, No.CCNU19TS001
Author: Liu Muxing (1979–), Professor, specialized in hydropedology and soil physics.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, M., Wang, Q., Guo, L. et al. Influence of canopy and topographic position on soil moisture response to rainfall in a hilly catchment of Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China. J. Geogr. Sci. 30, 949–968 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-020-1764-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-020-1764-1